While I still feel like it ...
in [Liverpool]
|
From: Diablos Rojos on 23 Apr 2010 04:47 "JAB" <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message news:L1dAn.35631$xE4.14939(a)newsfe29.ams2... > On 23/04/2010 9:33 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:HTcAn.35630$xE4.26611(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>> On 23/04/2010 9:19 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>> news:AAcAn.35629$xE4.32757(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>>>> On 23/04/2010 9:03 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >>>>>>> It's a shame the Liverpool model wasn't followed where the club did >>>>>>> have >>>>>>> the debt put on to it! >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You've confused me there, was that sarcasm? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It may have been ... I just remember all the gloating about how the >>>>> Liverpool take over was going to be different from the Man U one and >>>>> they >>>>> weren't going to be saddled with debt etc. not quite how it turned out >>>>> if >>>>> I remember! On a more serious note the situation at Liverpool does >>>>> indicate why the PL needs to think hard about who can buy clubs and >>>>> how >>>>> they are run. It could still go horrible wrong for Liverpool ... >>>>> >>>> >>>> What a shame that would be. >>>> >>>> Well the current owners have put the club up for sale... I'm thinking >>>> the >>>> �800 million asking price is a bit o the steep side though. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ... and that's the point I was making about some of the evaluations we >>> see >>> of clubs. �800 million for a club that needs a new ground and some >>> serious >>> investment in the team to enable it to compete for the title. Not >>> exactly >>> the sort of price I would of had in mind ... >> >> You're forgetting something else very important too.... �800million for a >> club that is not even in the money spinning Champions League next year >> and >> not even guaranteed entry into the other cup whatever they call it now. >> >> > > Does that really make that much difference to the asking price if you > assume that you need to invest to challenge for the title. What's the CL > worth, �20-�30mil? It's not to be sniffed at. The price they're asking is fantasy, half that would be a truer value.
From: JAB on 21 Apr 2010 01:46 On 20/04/2010 10:20 PM, Legend-11 wrote: > On 18/04/2010 12:41, Red Rackham wrote: >> "Graf Finklestein"<udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:8f5d3e66-2d3c-41ad-8c6e-2de848a7b988(a)j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... >> On 18 Apr, 12:12, "Red Rackham"<ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> "Udo Binsack"<udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> >>> news:86d79498-5ae0-497b-bf29-e0156b9f4f8c(a)u31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >>> >>> On 18 Apr, 11:18, "Steev"<st...(a)shirleyroad.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> "Google Beta User"<wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote >>> >>>>> I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of >>>>> three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them. I >>>>> haven't run the figures, but you've had some pretty big purchases. >>> >>>> Your hunch would be wrong. >>>> Since 2007 Chelsea have spent 94.2m and Man U 49.75m..(figures courtesy >>>> of >>>> soccerbase.com) >>> >>>> Steve >>> >>> Soccerbase is notoriously inaccurate. >>> >>> Yeah naff, you're far more reliable. >> >> More so than you, it seems. Notice you've chosen not to back up your >> "Chelsea have spent �2bn" lie. Any reason? >> >>> GBU's hunch is absolutely spot >>> on - Utd have spent far more than Chelsea. >>> >>> Source for United and Chelsea's spending since 2007? >> >> Just look it up. >> >> >> I'm asking for 'your' source. >> >> >>> Since 2007, Chelsea have spent �94m, Utd have spent over �105m just on >>> the likes of Berbatov, Nani, Hargreaves, Anderson, the Silva brothers, >>> Valencia and Obertan. That isn't taking into account how much they >>> spent on Manucho, Kuszczak (sp?), Samlling, Diouf, Tosic, Ljajic, etc. >>> >>> So far I've only found figures for the entire premiership era: >>> >>> http://transferleague.co.uk/ >> >> Feel free to post anything you feel disproves the above. >> >> >> Right. So you just want to take a period where Chelsea have already spent >> well over half a billion quid and pat yourself on the back because they >> haven't spent any more. >> >> Well done. >> >> PMSL > > > LOL, I noticed that too...he should get a job in politics....he'd go a > long way. :) > A job in politics ... Le Dieu claimed they had spent less money in the period that was clearly specified in a post and it was shown that this was yet another on of his "facts" i.e. flat out wrong and you think graf should be the politician? What a strange little world you inhabit if you think that pointing out someone is wrong makes you LOL.
From: Baldoni on 22 Apr 2010 03:47 Diablos Rojos explained : >> >> Just pissing about DR ... :-) >> > > I know but occassionally I feel forced to interject when it gets a bit silly > Jab is explaining himself to Rogers in the hope that Rogers will still let him play on here ! lol -- Count Baldoni In hoc signo vinces
From: Pope Pompous XVIII on 23 Apr 2010 13:31 On 2010-04-23, JAB <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote: > On 23/04/2010 9:19 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:AAcAn.35629$xE4.32757(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>> On 23/04/2010 9:03 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >>>>> It's a shame the Liverpool model wasn't followed where the club did have >>>>> the debt put on to it! >>>>> >>>> >>>> You've confused me there, was that sarcasm? >>>> >>> >>> It may have been ... I just remember all the gloating about how the >>> Liverpool take over was going to be different from the Man U one and they >>> weren't going to be saddled with debt etc. not quite how it turned out if >>> I remember! On a more serious note the situation at Liverpool does >>> indicate why the PL needs to think hard about who can buy clubs and how >>> they are run. It could still go horrible wrong for Liverpool ... >>> >> >> What a shame that would be. >> >> Well the current owners have put the club up for sale... I'm thinking the >> �800 million asking price is a bit o the steep side though. >> >> > > ... and that's the point I was making about some of the evaluations we > see of clubs. �800 million for a club that needs a new ground and some > serious investment in the team to enable it to compete for the title. > Not exactly the sort of price I would of had in mind ... Have you ever considered taking classes in grammar and writing, JAB? It would put you in a much stronger position to mock the intelligence of someone else. Just a thought. -- "It is incorrect to say that biological data cannot be decisive.... It is scientifically correct to say that an individual human life begins at conception.... Our laws, one function of which is to help preserve the lives of our people, should be based on accurate scientific data" - Professor Micheline Matthews-Roth, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard University Medical School, giving evidence to US Senate Judiciary Committee, 1981, set up to determine when human life begins.
From: JAB on 23 Apr 2010 13:39
On 23/04/2010 6:31 PM, Pope Pompous XVIII wrote: > On 2010-04-23, JAB<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote: >> On 23/04/2010 9:19 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>> news:AAcAn.35629$xE4.32757(a)newsfe29.ams2... >>>> On 23/04/2010 9:03 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >>>>>> It's a shame the Liverpool model wasn't followed where the club did have >>>>>> the debt put on to it! >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You've confused me there, was that sarcasm? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It may have been ... I just remember all the gloating about how the >>>> Liverpool take over was going to be different from the Man U one and they >>>> weren't going to be saddled with debt etc. not quite how it turned out if >>>> I remember! On a more serious note the situation at Liverpool does >>>> indicate why the PL needs to think hard about who can buy clubs and how >>>> they are run. It could still go horrible wrong for Liverpool ... >>>> >>> >>> What a shame that would be. >>> >>> Well the current owners have put the club up for sale... I'm thinking the >>> �800 million asking price is a bit o the steep side though. >>> >>> >> >> ... and that's the point I was making about some of the evaluations we >> see of clubs. �800 million for a club that needs a new ground and some >> serious investment in the team to enable it to compete for the title. >> Not exactly the sort of price I would of had in mind ... > > Have you ever considered taking classes in grammar and writing, JAB? > > It would put you in a much stronger position to mock the intelligence of > someone else. > > Just a thought. What's that pope? For a moment there I thought you were going to answer the question as to why your all powerful god designed a mechanism that produced so many abortions. You do seem to have a habit of just avoiding questions you can't answer, don't you pope? Mocking your intelligence is oh so easy. Possibly only balders would find it difficult to do ... p.s. When did you decide to be a pretend Irishman. Seems a bit weird for someone who's English don't you think? I look forward to your normal hand waving ... |