While I still feel like it ...
in [Liverpool]
|
From: Red Rackham on 25 Apr 2010 05:37 "JAB" <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message news:dl2An.35847$c71.1922(a)newsfe24.ams2... > On 22/04/2010 7:57 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:RV0An.30542$TL1.6656(a)newsfe06.ams2... >>> On 22/04/2010 8:33 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >>> >>>> The debt only becomes a worry when it is above the value of the club, >>>> but >>>> yet again that stock has risen. Forbes only yesterday announcing that >>>> MUFC >>>> is the most valuable sports club on the planet with a worth in excess >>>> of >>>> $1.8billion dollars, so it looks like the Red Knights might need to >>>> cough >>>> up at least �1.2billion to get their hands on the club. >>>> >>> >>> Well I think the dotcom boom showed that isn't overly true! >> >> >> You cannot compare a dotcom company, often with no tangible value at all, >> with a football club that has again been declared the most valuable >> sports >> franchise in the world at �1.2billion. >> >> >> The more >>> important aspect is do Man U have the cash flow to pay off the debt >>> while >>> at the same time keep the club running ... to which the answer is yes at >>> the moment. The worst case scenario is having to sell players to balance >>> the books leading to a downward spiral in popularity and therefore >>> income >>> to service such a large debt. >> >> >> Which is why players won't be sold to service the debt. >> >> >> Will it happen ... >>> probably not. I expect Man U to be sold in the next five years or so and >>> the Glazers to go away with a large smile on their faces. >> >> >> More worrying is the prospect of Roman leaving after deciding half a >> billion >> quid for 2 premierships isn't good value. >> >> > > <yawns> Damn, and your post was so interesting.
From: JAB on 25 Apr 2010 09:07 On 25/04/2010 10:37 AM, Red Rackham wrote: > "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message > news:dl2An.35847$c71.1922(a)newsfe24.ams2... >> On 22/04/2010 7:57 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>> news:RV0An.30542$TL1.6656(a)newsfe06.ams2... >>>> On 22/04/2010 8:33 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >>>> >>>>> The debt only becomes a worry when it is above the value of the club, >>>>> but >>>>> yet again that stock has risen. Forbes only yesterday announcing that >>>>> MUFC >>>>> is the most valuable sports club on the planet with a worth in excess >>>>> of >>>>> $1.8billion dollars, so it looks like the Red Knights might need to >>>>> cough >>>>> up at least �1.2billion to get their hands on the club. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Well I think the dotcom boom showed that isn't overly true! >>> >>> >>> You cannot compare a dotcom company, often with no tangible value at all, >>> with a football club that has again been declared the most valuable >>> sports >>> franchise in the world at �1.2billion. >>> >>> >>> The more >>>> important aspect is do Man U have the cash flow to pay off the debt >>>> while >>>> at the same time keep the club running ... to which the answer is yes at >>>> the moment. The worst case scenario is having to sell players to balance >>>> the books leading to a downward spiral in popularity and therefore >>>> income >>>> to service such a large debt. >>> >>> >>> Which is why players won't be sold to service the debt. >>> >>> >>> Will it happen ... >>>> probably not. I expect Man U to be sold in the next five years or so and >>>> the Glazers to go away with a large smile on their faces. >>> >>> >>> More worrying is the prospect of Roman leaving after deciding half a >>> billion >>> quid for 2 premierships isn't good value. >>> >>> >> >> <yawns> > > > Damn, and your post was so interesting. > > Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny that.
From: Red Rackham on 25 Apr 2010 09:08 "JAB" <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message news:g8XAn.93347$1%7.74289(a)newsfe07.ams2... > On 25/04/2010 10:37 AM, Red Rackham wrote: >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:dl2An.35847$c71.1922(a)newsfe24.ams2... >>> On 22/04/2010 7:57 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>> news:RV0An.30542$TL1.6656(a)newsfe06.ams2... >>>>> On 22/04/2010 8:33 AM, Diablos Rojos wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The debt only becomes a worry when it is above the value of the club, >>>>>> but >>>>>> yet again that stock has risen. Forbes only yesterday announcing >>>>>> that >>>>>> MUFC >>>>>> is the most valuable sports club on the planet with a worth in excess >>>>>> of >>>>>> $1.8billion dollars, so it looks like the Red Knights might need to >>>>>> cough >>>>>> up at least �1.2billion to get their hands on the club. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Well I think the dotcom boom showed that isn't overly true! >>>> >>>> >>>> You cannot compare a dotcom company, often with no tangible value at >>>> all, >>>> with a football club that has again been declared the most valuable >>>> sports >>>> franchise in the world at �1.2billion. >>>> >>>> >>>> The more >>>>> important aspect is do Man U have the cash flow to pay off the debt >>>>> while >>>>> at the same time keep the club running ... to which the answer is yes >>>>> at >>>>> the moment. The worst case scenario is having to sell players to >>>>> balance >>>>> the books leading to a downward spiral in popularity and therefore >>>>> income >>>>> to service such a large debt. >>>> >>>> >>>> Which is why players won't be sold to service the debt. >>>> >>>> >>>> Will it happen ... >>>>> probably not. I expect Man U to be sold in the next five years or so >>>>> and >>>>> the Glazers to go away with a large smile on their faces. >>>> >>>> >>>> More worrying is the prospect of Roman leaving after deciding half a >>>> billion >>>> quid for 2 premierships isn't good value. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> <yawns> >> >> >> Damn, and your post was so interesting. >> >> > > Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny that. Snap.
From: JAB on 25 Apr 2010 09:43 On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny that. <yawns>
From: Red Rackham on 25 Apr 2010 10:01
"JAB" <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... > On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny that. > > <yawns> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. |