While I still feel like it ...
in [Liverpool]
|
From: JAB on 14 Apr 2010 16:07 On 14/04/2010 12:21 PM, Red Rackham wrote: > "Red Rackham"<ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:... >> ... I would like to offer a few words in praise of Arsenal. Incredible >> after their home trouncings by United and Chelsea that they're still >> hanging on and in with an outside chance of winning the league and >> probably a 50/50 of finishing ahead of United. >> >> Whatever you say about Wenger he clearly knows how to run a club. Without >> any real big money signings he turns out teams who compete at the highest >> level. >> >> Whilst a lot of nonsense about their football is written by the >> Londoncentric media, United are palabably > > > Er, 'palpably'. > > HTH > > Nope that's fine you've invented a new word ... it's even there when you do a google search.
From: Pope Pompous XVIII on 16 Apr 2010 10:06 On 2010-04-16, Red Rackham <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > And as for Utd - well, how can you take seriously a club where its own > fans can't make their minds up what its official colours are. > > Brilliant observational comedy. So glad you took the time and effort to post > that. > > 10/10 It's weird how you keep contradicting yourself like this. -- "Everybody thinks that the tomb signifies death. Not at all, the exact opposite. The Shroud and the tomb signify an unbelievable beginning, because in the depth of the collapsed event horizon, there is something which science knows as 'singularity'. This is exactly what started the universe in the 'Big Bang'. We have nothing less in the tomb of Christ than the beginning of a new universe" - Dame Isabel Piczek, particle physicist, 2007 documentary /The Fabric of Time/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVQea5Uca24
From: Steev on 17 Apr 2010 08:43 "Graf Finklestein" <udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:9f4b3805-f5bb-4ca0-afce-a2800fc6f887(a)y17g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... On 14 Apr, 12:09, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > Chelsea have spent �2billion, take 250 fans to a Premiership away game and > it would hurt to see another trophy bought in such a shameless way. >Timmy, would you like to show a breakdown of this �2bn you claim >Chelsea have spent, or post some links to verify it, or provide any >kind of proof at all? Never gonna happen...
From: SteveH on 17 Apr 2010 10:45 Legend-11 <Slitheen23(a)dropallthisgooglemail.com> wrote: > Hecka' lot of money, I think was his point. I've no idea of the sum > myself, but at the time it was being spent...certainly felt like > billions. :) CNN reckon it's 2 billion dollars. -- SteveH
From: Google Beta User on 17 Apr 2010 10:51
On Apr 17, 10:44 am, Legend-11 <Slithee...(a)dropallthisgooglemail.com> wrote: > Hecka' lot of money, I think was his point. I've no idea of the sum > myself, but at the time it was being spent...certainly felt like > billions. :) Didn't you simply match/pass their spending though once Abramovich came into the picture? Could be wrong though, haven't checked the exact figures. |