While I still feel like it ...
in [Liverpool]
|
From: Udo Binsack on 18 Apr 2010 06:44 On 18 Apr, 11:18, "Steev" <st...(a)shirleyroad.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > "Google Beta User" <wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote > > > >I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of > >three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them. I > >haven't run the figures, but you've had some pretty big purchases. > > Your hunch would be wrong. > Since 2007 Chelsea have spent 94.2m and Man U 49.75m..(figures courtesy of > soccerbase.com) > > Steve Soccerbase is notoriously inaccurate. GBU's hunch is absolutely spot on - Utd have spent far more than Chelsea. Since 2007, Chelsea have spent £94m, Utd have spent over £105m just on the likes of Berbatov, Nani, Hargreaves, Anderson, the Silva brothers, Valencia and Obertan. That isn't taking into account how much they spent on Manucho, Kuszczak (sp?), Samlling, Diouf, Tosic, Ljajic, etc.
From: Red Rackham on 18 Apr 2010 07:12 "Udo Binsack" <udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:86d79498-5ae0-497b-bf29-e0156b9f4f8c(a)u31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... On 18 Apr, 11:18, "Steev" <st...(a)shirleyroad.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > "Google Beta User" <wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote > > > >I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of > >three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them. I > >haven't run the figures, but you've had some pretty big purchases. > > Your hunch would be wrong. > Since 2007 Chelsea have spent 94.2m and Man U 49.75m..(figures courtesy of > soccerbase.com) > > Steve Soccerbase is notoriously inaccurate. Yeah naff, you're far more reliable. GBU's hunch is absolutely spot on - Utd have spent far more than Chelsea. Source for United and Chelsea's spending since 2007? Since 2007, Chelsea have spent �94m, Utd have spent over �105m just on the likes of Berbatov, Nani, Hargreaves, Anderson, the Silva brothers, Valencia and Obertan. That isn't taking into account how much they spent on Manucho, Kuszczak (sp?), Samlling, Diouf, Tosic, Ljajic, etc. So far I've only found figures for the entire premiership era: http://transferleague.co.uk/
From: Red Rackham on 18 Apr 2010 07:16 "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:... > > "Udo Binsack" <udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:86d79498-5ae0-497b-bf29-e0156b9f4f8c(a)u31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On 18 Apr, 11:18, "Steev" <st...(a)shirleyroad.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >> "Google Beta User" <wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote >> > >> >I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of >> >three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them. I >> >haven't run the figures, but you've had some pretty big purchases. >> >> Your hunch would be wrong. >> Since 2007 Chelsea have spent 94.2m and Man U 49.75m..(figures courtesy >> of >> soccerbase.com) >> >> Steve > > Soccerbase is notoriously inaccurate. > > > > Yeah naff, you're far more reliable. > > > > > GBU's hunch is absolutely spot > on - Utd have spent far more than Chelsea. > > > Source for United and Chelsea's spending since 2007? > > > > Since 2007, Chelsea have spent �94m, Utd have spent over �105m just on > the likes of Berbatov, Nani, Hargreaves, Anderson, the Silva brothers, > Valencia and Obertan. That isn't taking into account how much they > spent on Manucho, Kuszczak (sp?), Samlling, Diouf, Tosic, Ljajic, etc. > > > So far I've only found figures for the entire premiership era: > > http://transferleague.co.uk/ Interesting that Chelsea have spent by far the most money and only have 2 premierships to show for it. Liverpool are also well above United with 0 titles. United, 5th highest spenders, and the only club whose money has come from success on the field, have 11 titles to their name. HTH
From: Graf Finklestein on 18 Apr 2010 07:36 On 18 Apr, 12:12, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > "Udo Binsack" <udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:86d79498-5ae0-497b-bf29-e0156b9f4f8c(a)u31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > On 18 Apr, 11:18, "Steev" <st...(a)shirleyroad.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: > > > "Google Beta User" <wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote > > > >I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of > > >three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them. I > > >haven't run the figures, but you've had some pretty big purchases. > > > Your hunch would be wrong. > > Since 2007 Chelsea have spent 94.2m and Man U 49.75m..(figures courtesy of > > soccerbase.com) > > > Steve > > Soccerbase is notoriously inaccurate. > > Yeah naff, you're far more reliable. More so than you, it seems. Notice you've chosen not to back up your "Chelsea have spent £2bn" lie. Any reason? > GBU's hunch is absolutely spot > on - Utd have spent far more than Chelsea. > > Source for United and Chelsea's spending since 2007? Just look it up. > Since 2007, Chelsea have spent £94m, Utd have spent over £105m just on > the likes of Berbatov, Nani, Hargreaves, Anderson, the Silva brothers, > Valencia and Obertan. That isn't taking into account how much they > spent on Manucho, Kuszczak (sp?), Samlling, Diouf, Tosic, Ljajic, etc. > > So far I've only found figures for the entire premiership era: > > http://transferleague.co.uk/ Feel free to post anything you feel disproves the above. Facts only though, okay? Try to keep the lies and bullshit to a minimum.
From: Red Rackham on 18 Apr 2010 07:38
"Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:... > > "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:... >> >> "Udo Binsack" <udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:86d79498-5ae0-497b-bf29-e0156b9f4f8c(a)u31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... >> On 18 Apr, 11:18, "Steev" <st...(a)shirleyroad.freeserve.co.uk> wrote: >>> "Google Beta User" <wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote >>> > >>> >I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of >>> >three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them. I >>> >haven't run the figures, but you've had some pretty big purchases. >>> >>> Your hunch would be wrong. >>> Since 2007 Chelsea have spent 94.2m and Man U 49.75m..(figures courtesy >>> of >>> soccerbase.com) >>> >>> Steve >> >> Soccerbase is notoriously inaccurate. >> >> >> >> Yeah naff, you're far more reliable. >> >> >> >> >> GBU's hunch is absolutely spot >> on - Utd have spent far more than Chelsea. >> >> >> Source for United and Chelsea's spending since 2007? >> >> >> >> Since 2007, Chelsea have spent �94m, Utd have spent over �105m just on >> the likes of Berbatov, Nani, Hargreaves, Anderson, the Silva brothers, >> Valencia and Obertan. That isn't taking into account how much they >> spent on Manucho, Kuszczak (sp?), Samlling, Diouf, Tosic, Ljajic, etc. >> >> >> So far I've only found figures for the entire premiership era: >> >> http://transferleague.co.uk/ > > > Interesting that Chelsea have spent by far the most money and only have 2 > premierships to show for it. > > Liverpool are also well above United with 0 titles. > > United, 5th highest spenders, and the only club whose money has come from > success on the field, have 11 titles to their name. > > HTH Apologies, that should read, 'United, 6th highest spenders' ... HTH |