From: Red Rackham on

"Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c22b6a01-b809-4196-8bf4-cabeb28f8714(a)i37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 10:44 am, Legend-11 <Slithee...(a)dropallthisgooglemail.com>
wrote:

> Hecka' lot of money, I think was his point. I've no idea of the sum
> myself, but at the time it was being spent...certainly felt like
> billions. :)

Didn't you simply match/pass their spending though once Abramovich
came into the picture? Could be wrong though, haven't checked the
exact figures.


Then I'd suggest checking them first before making such an erroneous post.
We haven't spent anything near Chelsea's amount. Not even half.


From: Legend-11 on
"Google Beta User"<wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:c22b6a01-b809-4196-8bf4-cabeb28f8714(a)i37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On Apr 17, 10:44 am, Legend-11<Slithee...(a)dropallthisgooglemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hecka' lot of money, I think was his point. I've no idea of the sum
>> myself, but at the time it was being spent...certainly felt like
>> billions. :)
>
> Didn't you simply match/pass their spending though once Abramovich
> came into the picture? Could be wrong though, haven't checked the
> exact figures.
>

No way near it, fella. Not even close.



--
Legend-11
Forget about Ronaldo.
Your Carlos Tevez too.
'Cos we've got a player who's United through and through.
He just might tw*t your groundsman, and bomb down your wing,
He's French, he's fast, he's f*cking CLASS, so hear United sing:
Tra la laa, it's Patrice Evra, tra la laa laa laa laa laa...
From: Google Beta User on
On Apr 17, 12:31 pm, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> Didn't you simply match/pass their spending though once >Abramovich came into the picture?  Could be wrong though, haven't >checked the exact figures.
>
> Then I'd suggest checking them first before making such an >erroneous post. We haven't spent anything near Chelsea's amount. >Not even half.

Let me rephrase, Chelsea passed you, then you stepped up a gear and
matched/passed *their* spending?

I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of
three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them. I
haven't run the figures, but you've had some pretty big purchases.

Mind you I don't think there is, nor have I ever suggested, that it's
somehow "wrong" or illegitimate for a club to spend money, so more
power to you.

But yes if you count all of Abramovichs time, clearly they've outspent
you.
From: Red Rackham on

"Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5ce52c03-4d74-484e-9206-39806394edb1(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 12:31 pm, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> Didn't you simply match/pass their spending though once >Abramovich came
> into the picture? Could be wrong though, haven't >checked the exact
> figures.
>
> Then I'd suggest checking them first before making such an >erroneous
> post. We haven't spent anything near Chelsea's amount. >Not even half.

Let me rephrase, Chelsea passed you, then you stepped up a gear and
matched/passed *their* spending?



Absolutely not.



I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of
three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them.


These things are best not done on 'hunches'. Hard facts are necessary. They
will tell you that Chelsea have *far* outspent United.

..


From: Steev on

"Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5ce52c03-4d74-484e-9206-39806394edb1(a)5g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 12:31 pm, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> Didn't you simply match/pass their spending though once >Abramovich came
> into the picture? Could be wrong though, haven't >checked the exact
> figures.
>
> Then I'd suggest checking them first before making such an >erroneous
> post. We haven't spent anything near >Chelsea's amount. >Not even half.

>Let me rephrase, Chelsea passed you, then you stepped up a gear and
>matched/passed *their* spending?

>I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current run of
>three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them. I
>haven't run the figures, but you've had some pretty big purchases.

Your hunch would be wrong.
Since 2007 Chelsea have spent 94.2m and Man U 49.75m..(figures courtesy of
soccerbase.com)

Steve

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Prev: test
Next: Fergie's first words after a 4 year drunk bender