From: Red Rackham on

"Manx Gunner" <goal(a)4thegunners!.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.26355595ab258b30989c76(a)news-europe.giganews.com...
> [REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net | REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net]
> [<11ems55au372vfo8t656h2mbclrjr4cpj6(a)4ax.com>]
> [Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:49:58 -0400]
>
> : On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 17:46:53 +0100, Manx Gunner
> : <goal(a)4thegunners!.com> wrote:
> :
> : >[REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net | REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net]
> : >[<q5dms55d6a0sudu58nkiddclq1m733evhn(a)4ax.com>]
> : >[Sun, 18 Apr 2010 12:46:24 -0400]
> : >
> : >: Manx denies that there is such a thing as an ABU and insists it's all
> : >: in United fan's minds.
> : >
> : >Nope, that's not what I've said.
> :
> : That's certainly what you seemed to suggest
>
> Not remotely. I wrote that some fans overstate things, as doing so
> provides
> them with a convenient (read: lazy) defense against otherwise legitimate
> criticism and/or observation.


Your 'legitimate' criticism has been shredded point by point and exposed as
lazy abuism. The fact that you've ignored my post pointing out your nonsense
is as good as an admission of this.

HTH


From: Manx Gunner on
[ONeil37(a)hotmail.com | Red Rackham]
[<aHJyn.445488$2R.384236(a)newsfe11.ams2>]
[Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:10:46 +0100]

: Your 'legitimate' criticism has been shredded point by point and exposed as
: lazy abuism. The fact that you've ignored my post pointing out your nonsense
: is as good as an admission of this.

Perhaps you center all of your discussion points around yourself; I'm not quite
that stuck on myself, though, so I don't. As for any post of mine earlier, I'm
free - like everyone - to be wrong from time to time. No one's perfect, after
all. What I write has nothing to do with any 'ABU' concept, however. Period.


From: Red Rackham on

"Manx Gunner" <goal(a)4thegunners!.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.26357a79a6115de1989c78(a)news-europe.giganews.com...
> [ONeil37(a)hotmail.com | Red Rackham]
> [<aHJyn.445488$2R.384236(a)newsfe11.ams2>]
> [Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:10:46 +0100]
>
> : Your 'legitimate' criticism has been shredded point by point and exposed
> as
> : lazy abuism. The fact that you've ignored my post pointing out your
> nonsense
> : is as good as an admission of this.
>
> Perhaps you center all of your discussion points around yourself; I'm not
> quite
> that stuck on myself, though, so I don't. As for any post of mine
> earlier, I'm
> free - like everyone - to be wrong from time to time. No one's perfect,
> after
> all. What I write has nothing to do with any 'ABU' concept, however.
> Period.


Another common trait among abus.

Denial.

HTH


From: Manx Gunner on
[ONeil37(a)hotmail.com | Red Rackham]
[<IUJyn.446102$2R.122907(a)newsfe11.ams2>]
[Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:25:12 +0100]

: > all. What I write has nothing to do with any 'ABU' concept, however.
: > Period.

: Another common trait among abus.
: Denial.

There's not much anyone can say in the face of a stubborn and unfounded
assertion that something is going on which in fact isn't. I don't have an
attitude of 'Anyone But Manchester United', as I have explained on several
occasions, yet you persist. You're demonstrating that you have little class.

From: Red Rackham on

"Manx Gunner" <goal(a)4thegunners!.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.26357c9191f251bb989c7c(a)news-europe.giganews.com...
> [ONeil37(a)hotmail.com | Red Rackham]
> [<IUJyn.446102$2R.122907(a)newsfe11.ams2>]
> [Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:25:12 +0100]
>
> : > all. What I write has nothing to do with any 'ABU' concept, however.
> : > Period.
>
> : Another common trait among abus.
> : Denial.
>
> There's not much anyone can say in the face of a stubborn and unfounded
> assertion that something is going on which in fact isn't.


You can counter it with facts. Which is what I did to your 'City will be
Manchester's biggest club' nonsense.


I don't have an
> attitude of 'Anyone But Manchester United', as I have explained on several
> occasions, yet you persist.


You can only be judged by what you write in here. Your posts reek of abuism.