From: Yid Army on 5 May 2010 20:47 "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:BM0En.39460$rk7.35654(a)newsfe27.ams2... > ... That wasn't my one and only political thread. Here's another - > probably my last. > > Vote Conservative if: No more Boom & Bust No More direct taxation We'll have referendum on Europe Let's take Banking regulation away from the Bank of England and give it to a bunch of luvvies who can't count to 10 Let's open our borders to unlimited immigration as they will be natural Labour voters. A bloated overpaid civil service is good? A criminal/gypsy/illegal asylum seeker/burglar has got more Human Rights than you do and how could we forget about the effects of banning conker fights because of insane health & safety or calling an old lady a bigot for no reason. Bye!
From: Diablos Rojos on 6 May 2010 03:38 "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:84dokoF8s7U1(a)mid.individual.net... > Mentalguy2k8 formulated on Wednesday : >> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:GKeEn.7542$BA6.4512(a)newsfe06.ams2... >>> >>> "bofh" <lancj2(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:2d970296-f835-4f34-b5f5-244805baf4db(a)b7g2000yqk.googlegroups.com... >>>> On 4 May, 22:58, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> ... That wasn't my one and only political thread. Here's another - >>>>> probably >>>>> my last. >>>>> >>>>> Vote Conservative if: >>>>> >>>>> You are a higher rate tax payer >>>>> >>>>> Don't care about the NHS >>>>> >>>> >>>> Have you got even the slightest insight into how much money is being >>>> slashed, now, and for the previous six months, from NHS budgets, by >>>> the current government ? >>>> >>>> No, you dont - you wouldnt have posted that bollocks if you did >>> >>> >>> Do you know people who work in the NHS Ted? >>> >>> I know lots and they're all, every single one, terrified of the Tories >>> getting in. >> >> So you keep saying, but you still won't tell anyone why. >> >> Unless they're the army of pseudo-management who are sucking the >> resources out of the NHS, in which case good riddance to them. I don't >> know what kind of posters they have in their staff room, but I also know >> people who work in the NHS, manly front-line, and I think it's fair to >> say they couldn't give a shiny shite who wins the election. > > Labour's answer was to pour loads of money into the NHS regardless of > whether it was a good thing or not. There are too many administrators and > not enough medical professionals running the hospitals. They could have > organised a much better strategy as opposed to pouring money in. It has > not solved the problems that exist within the NHS. > > -- > Count Baldoni > > For once you get it right.
From: Baldoni on 6 May 2010 06:31 It happens that Justin Thyme formulated : > On 05/05/2010 18:31, Lawrence Jenkins wrote: > DLA which has been given almost to >> anyone the ticks theright boxes on the application forms you can then see >> how bad its got. >> >> > > Contrary to your claim it is not always easy to successfully claim DLA. It > took me three goes to make a successful claim, this despite having a > schizophrenia then schizoaffective(combination of schizophrenia and a mood > disorder) diagnosis for over 25 years by the time of my second failed > claim. > In the end i had to get help filling in the forms to make a successful claim. > > > > http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/11987 It is a populist initiative used to gain votes. -- Count Baldoni
From: Lawrence Jenkins on 6 May 2010 16:27 "Justin Thyme" <hel(a)lo.com> wrote in message news:hrseot$lpd$1(a)speranza.aioe.org... > On 05/05/2010 18:31, Lawrence Jenkins wrote: > DLA which has been given almost to >> anyone the ticks theright boxes on the application forms you can then see >> how bad its got. >> >> > > Contrary to your claim it is not always easy to successfully claim DLA. It > took me three goes to make a successful claim, this despite having a > schizophrenia then schizoaffective(combination of schizophrenia and a mood > disorder) diagnosis for over 25 years by the time of my second failed > claim. > In the end i had to get help filling in the forms to make a successful > claim. > > > > http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/11987 > I personally know/knew 5 people who never met the criteria for DLA but still got it or abused it anyway. First case. A son who's dad's leg was amputated. The dad gets DLA care and full mobility yet the son uses that buys a Saab and uses his dads car for work -okay that's abuse. Two further chaps both in receipt of middle rate care and low rate mobility. Both perfectly able to dress themselves get out in fact one of them goes by himself to brighton every weekend. Now as I understand it care is for people who need help going to the toilet, dressing them selves and cooking and mobility is for people who are so disabled that they can't use public transport or they are a danger to themselves or others. In all cases this was not true.
From: johnty on 6 May 2010 18:16
On 4 May, 23:41, "Lawrence Jenkins" <lawrenc...(a)sky.com> wrote: > > My vote will go to whoever promises to > Increase sentencing so that life actually means life with preferably capital > punishment increasingly an option. > BNP it is, then. |