Okay, I lied ...
in [Liverpool]
|
From: Red Rackham on 5 May 2010 13:51 "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:OrhEn.34541$G27.7822(a)newsfe30.ams2... > > "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:l2gEn.363693$1j3.234940(a)newsfe10.ams2... >> >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:zVeEn.397814$0t.87471(a)newsfe17.ams2... >>> >>> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:nNeEn.7544$BA6.1781(a)newsfe06.ams2... >>>> >>>> "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> news:84cnf1FrjqU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>>> >>>>> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:BM0En.39460$rk7.35654(a)newsfe27.ams2... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You're fighting a losing battle, the country is once again in a state >>>>> due to >>>>> being governed by labour, all looked rosey the first few years whilst >>>>> they >>>>> lived off the good financial policies put in place by the >>>>> conservatives. >>>>> When called to put their own policies in place because of the globally >>>>> changing face of economics which placed London firmly as the epicentre >>>>> they >>>>> gambled and got greedy and fucked it right up. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> You do know that this recession isn't half as bad as the Tory-run >>>> recession of the 80s, don't you? >>>> >>>> And you do understand that it's the Tories who are the bankers friends >>>> and it's the Tories who would have let them run even wilder? >>>> >>>> Do you think one single investment banker will be voting anything but >>>> Tory? >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Not to mention, crime, immigration, parts of the British Isles being >>>>> given >>>>> their own governance and milking good old England dry whilst England >>>>> struggles under the weight of not only financing them but the swarm of >>>>> parasitic ne'r do wells who swarm here for handouts from the far flung >>>>> corners of the world. >>>> >>>> >>>> The second the Tories take control thousands of police, teachers, >>>> nurses and other public sector workers will lose their jobs. This isn't >>>> scare-mongering, this is fact. >>> >>> The second they take power?? And you're telling us this is fact??? >>> >>> Stop screaming like a hormonal woman, calm down and take some deep >>> breaths FFS. >> >> >> Or we could actually discuss this like grown ups. > > How can we discuss this like grown-ups? You're claiming you can see the > future. I'm saying you can't. > > If you can post some solid evidence that what you are predicting is 100% > going to happen, then I'll discuss it maturely. That's not really how political debates work though, is it.
From: Red Rackham on 5 May 2010 13:52 "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:PrhEn.34542$G27.22629(a)newsfe30.ams2... > > "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:H1gEn.363692$1j3.50940(a)newsfe10.ams2... >> >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:zVeEn.397813$0t.374608(a)newsfe17.ams2... >>> >>> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:YNeEn.7545$BA6.853(a)newsfe06.ams2... >>>> >>>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:zjeEn.397806$0t.170702(a)newsfe17.ams2... >>>>> >>>>> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:BM0En.39460$rk7.35654(a)newsfe27.ams2... >>>>>> ... That wasn't my one and only political thread. Here's another - >>>>>> probably my last. >>>>>> >>>>>> Vote Conservative if: >>>>>> >>>>>> You are a higher rate tax payer >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't care about the NHS >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't care about public services >>>>>> >>>>>> Like the idea of being governed by an old Etonian who literally >>>>>> doesn't understand anyone who isn't posh >>>>>> >>>>>> Think George Osbourne has the intelligence and experience to get the >>>>>> country out of its financial problems >>>>>> >>>>>> Want to be incredibly depressed for at least the next 5 years >>>>>> >>>>>> Everyone else - Vote Labour! >>>>> >>>>> Is it just me, or is there a strong smell of desperation in the air? >>>>> >>>>> Yet another Labour Party Political Broadcast that's all smear and >>>>> absolutely no truth. Enjoy the next 16 years of being in opposition, >>>>> losers. That's if the LibDems don't become the official opposition >>>>> after tomorrow..... >>>> >>>> >>>> Care to debate the lack of truth point by point? >>> >>> You posted the claims, so it's up to you to prove them. Like Popey is >>> asked to. Just keep in mind all the sources that you've previously said >>> are unreliable. >> >> >> I didn't ask you to disprove them. Just tackle them one by one. > > Post concrete proof and I'll tackle them. Just have a look at the history of the NHS under both flavours of govt. There's all the proof you'll ever need.
From: Mentalguy2k8 on 5 May 2010 14:50 "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1fiEn.397818$0t.127030(a)newsfe17.ams2... > > "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:OrhEn.34541$G27.7822(a)newsfe30.ams2... >> >> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:l2gEn.363693$1j3.234940(a)newsfe10.ams2... >>> >>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:zVeEn.397814$0t.87471(a)newsfe17.ams2... >>>> >>>> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:nNeEn.7544$BA6.1781(a)newsfe06.ams2... >>>>> >>>>> "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:84cnf1FrjqU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>>>> >>>>>> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:BM0En.39460$rk7.35654(a)newsfe27.ams2... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> You're fighting a losing battle, the country is once again in a state >>>>>> due to >>>>>> being governed by labour, all looked rosey the first few years whilst >>>>>> they >>>>>> lived off the good financial policies put in place by the >>>>>> conservatives. >>>>>> When called to put their own policies in place because of the >>>>>> globally >>>>>> changing face of economics which placed London firmly as the >>>>>> epicentre they >>>>>> gambled and got greedy and fucked it right up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You do know that this recession isn't half as bad as the Tory-run >>>>> recession of the 80s, don't you? >>>>> >>>>> And you do understand that it's the Tories who are the bankers friends >>>>> and it's the Tories who would have let them run even wilder? >>>>> >>>>> Do you think one single investment banker will be voting anything but >>>>> Tory? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Not to mention, crime, immigration, parts of the British Isles being >>>>>> given >>>>>> their own governance and milking good old England dry whilst England >>>>>> struggles under the weight of not only financing them but the swarm >>>>>> of >>>>>> parasitic ne'r do wells who swarm here for handouts from the far >>>>>> flung >>>>>> corners of the world. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The second the Tories take control thousands of police, teachers, >>>>> nurses and other public sector workers will lose their jobs. This >>>>> isn't scare-mongering, this is fact. >>>> >>>> The second they take power?? And you're telling us this is fact??? >>>> >>>> Stop screaming like a hormonal woman, calm down and take some deep >>>> breaths FFS. >>> >>> >>> Or we could actually discuss this like grown ups. >> >> How can we discuss this like grown-ups? You're claiming you can see the >> future. I'm saying you can't. >> >> If you can post some solid evidence that what you are predicting is 100% >> going to happen, then I'll discuss it maturely. > > > That's not really how political debates work though, is it. What, with facts you mean? If you want me to make up a list of reasons why Gordon Brown will give you cancer, murder your grandparents and raise VAT to 54% I can, but it isn't really helpful because it's made up.
From: JAB on 5 May 2010 14:51 Which one as the amount of "facts" you spew out that are complete bollocks makes it difficult to work out which you're talking about ...
From: Justin Thyme on 5 May 2010 14:52
On 05/05/2010 18:31, Lawrence Jenkins wrote: DLA which has been given almost to > anyone the ticks theright boxes on the application forms you can then see > how bad its got. > > Contrary to your claim it is not always easy to successfully claim DLA. It took me three goes to make a successful claim, this despite having a schizophrenia then schizoaffective(combination of schizophrenia and a mood disorder) diagnosis for over 25 years by the time of my second failed claim. In the end i had to get help filling in the forms to make a successful claim. http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/11987 |