From: REDDEVIL6 on
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:48:37 GMT, Baldoni <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:

>scooped explained on 10/02/2010 :
>> "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
>> news:7tfu68Fm06U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>> The Arseblog has stated that we stand to lose 6 points from the 2 matches
>>> we played against them. Is there any truth in this and do any other clubs
>>> stand to possibly have points deducted on account of Pompey maybe going
>>> through the hoop ?
>>>
>>> -- Count Baldoni
>>>
>>> In hoc signo vinces
>>>
>> Boredoni why will you lose the race for 4th? Exaxctly why. LOLZ :)
>
>I see you never made it to the match then Scoopex you clown. Yet you
>said you would be there. Have you got your yellow tartan trousers and
>size 26 shoes on ?
>
>*Clowned*

You weren't there either..sell many burgers tonight?
From: Baldoni on
REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net presented the following explanation :
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:48:37 GMT, Baldoni <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> scooped explained on 10/02/2010 :
>>> "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:7tfu68Fm06U1(a)mid.individual.net...
>>>> The Arseblog has stated that we stand to lose 6 points from the 2 matches
>>>> we played against them. Is there any truth in this and do any other clubs
>>>> stand to possibly have points deducted on account of Pompey maybe going
>>>> through the hoop ?
>>>>
>>>> -- Count Baldoni
>>>>
>>>> In hoc signo vinces
>>>>
>>> Boredoni why will you lose the race for 4th? Exaxctly why. LOLZ :)
>>
>> I see you never made it to the match then Scoopex you clown. Yet you
>> said you would be there. Have you got your yellow tartan trousers and
>> size 26 shoes on ?
>>
>> *Clowned*
>
> You weren't there either..sell many burgers tonight?

Go get your shine box Drivel ! lol

--
Count Baldoni

In hoc signo vinces


From: Mike Hall on
I wonder if there will be a ripple effect if Portsmouth go under,
seeing as how all the EPL club's credit ratings will suddenly drop
like a stone.
If all the loans are cancelled then the likes of Liverpool and
Manchester United would immediately be forced into administration,
even though there is zero chance of either being wound up. I don't
think Arsenal would have a problem, seeing as how the board are
currently blocking millions of pounds of investment to avoid
foreigners (who have not passed the Arsenal fit-and-proper test)
getting their paws on the club. The other EPL clubs with debts (like
Hull City) would suddenly find themselves in Portsmouth-like trouble.


Mike Hall
From: REDDEVIL6 on
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:33:10 -0800 (PST), Mike Hall <tarrow(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>I wonder if there will be a ripple effect if Portsmouth go under,
>seeing as how all the EPL club's credit ratings will suddenly drop
>like a stone.
>If all the loans are cancelled then the likes of Liverpool and
>Manchester United would immediately be forced into administration,
>even though there is zero chance of either being wound up. I don't
>think Arsenal would have a problem, seeing as how the board are
>currently blocking millions of pounds of investment to avoid
>foreigners (who have not passed the Arsenal fit-and-proper test)
>getting their paws on the club. The other EPL clubs with debts (like
>Hull City) would suddenly find themselves in Portsmouth-like trouble.
>
>
>Mike Hall

I don't think you really understand how these things work. If
Arsenal's loans were called in they would be in exactly the same
situation as Liverpool and Manchester United excepting those two clubs
have already paid for their stadiums so they would be in a better
position than Arsenal. As far as the "fit and proper test" Arsenal
have done no such thing and will be owned by whoever decided to buy
them.

From: Pakistan Meteorological Department on
REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2010 18:33:10 -0800 (PST), Mike Hall <tarrow(a)yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>I wonder if there will be a ripple effect if Portsmouth go under,
>>seeing as how all the EPL club's credit ratings will suddenly drop
>>like a stone.
>>If all the loans are cancelled then the likes of Liverpool and
>>Manchester United would immediately be forced into administration,
>>even though there is zero chance of either being wound up. I don't
>>think Arsenal would have a problem, seeing as how the board are
>>currently blocking millions of pounds of investment to avoid
>>foreigners (who have not passed the Arsenal fit-and-proper test)
>>getting their paws on the club. The other EPL clubs with debts (like
>>Hull City) would suddenly find themselves in Portsmouth-like trouble.
>>
>>
>>Mike Hall
>
>
> I don't think you really understand how these things work. If
> Arsenal's loans were called in they would be in exactly the same
> situation as Liverpool and Manchester United excepting those two clubs
> have already paid for their stadiums so they would be in a better
> position than Arsenal. As far as the "fit and proper test" Arsenal
> have done no such thing and will be owned by whoever decided to buy
> them.
>


Incorrect as usual.

The FA/Prem conduct a veto process or 'fit and proper' test on owners.
However, how did Shinawatra pass this assesment?


--
"Entire units of the Metropolitan Police and the Flying Squad and the
drug squad were Freemasons. They all, in the end, were sent to prison.
When you are bonded by an oath of mutual defence and loyalty, you may
well find that it is extremely difficult to squeal on your corrupt brethren"

Martin Short on BBC Newsnight 19/03/01