From: Angof on
(o: wrote:
> On 24 Feb, 12:45, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)>
> wrote:
>> (o: wrote:
>>> On 24 Feb, 10:36, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for
>>> Mail)> wrote:
>>>> (o: wrote:
>>>>> On 24 Feb, 09:42, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for
>>>>> Mail)> wrote:
>>>>>> (o: wrote:
>>>>>>> On 23 Feb, 22:28, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for
>>>>>>> Mail)> wrote:
>>>>>>>> sme wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "(o:" <glesgab...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> news:1172268141.749781.214160(a)k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>>>>>>>> << snipped >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator'
>>>>>>>>>>> thought was a Tim on the wind up. I'd said much worse on
>>>>>>>>>>> many occasions in the past.
>>
>>>>>>>>>> i think your a tim, so blame me :-) you would not be my
>>>>>>>>>> first.or my last.
>>
>>>>>>>>> lmao. You're admitting to being the idiot moderator??? You
>>>>>>>>> accuse everyone of being a tim who isn't as fucked up as you
>>>>>>>>> are!
>>
>>>>>>>> That about sums him up. Him and his ever shrinking bunch of
>>>>>>>> cronies are convinced that anyone who doesn't agree with them
>>>>>>>> is a 'Timmy'. It's quite sad really.
>>
>>>>>>> nothing to do with agreeing, you dont get banned for debating
>>>>>>> your point, you do for calling other users scum.
>>
>>>>>> I never called other users scum though Einstein.
>>
>>>>> you called bears scum the other day, you just called them morons,
>>>>> you sir are an idiot.
>>
>>>> LOL...getting called an idiot by Jim...oh the shame! Get it into
>>>> that thick skull off yours...I didn't call anyone scum on FF to get
>>>> banned or anyone morons for that matter....do-you-un-der-stand?
>>
>>> i dont care what you say you didnt do on FF ...
>>
>> So why are you saying 'you get banned for calling other users scum'
>> scum?
>
> I said you would get banned.

Actually untrue...I have said far worse and slagged the straight armed
saluters, as have the majority on there, so you are talking shite.


From: Angof on
(o: wrote:
> On 24 Feb, 17:36, "liam*" <l...(a)TISCALI.is.ok> wrote:
> Page 18 of Bill Murray's 'Glasgow's giants: 100 years of the Old Firm'
>
> The formation of Glasgow Celtic [was] the brainchild of the Marist
> Brother Walfrid...

Mmm...you know a lot about Celtic don't you...sniff sniff.


From: (o: on
On 24 Feb, 21:04, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)>
wrote:


why dont i name the pub and you can turn up and voice your opinion, am
sure the lads would love to hear what you think of me, i will ask them
to keep the music off just incase you get all offended.


From: AntiTim on

"(o:" <glesgabear(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1172353685.404804.269040(a)p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> On 24 Feb, 21:04, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)>
> wrote:
>
>
> why dont i name the pub and you can turn up and voice your opinion, am
> sure the lads would love to hear what you think of me, i will ask them
> to keep the music off just incase you get all offended.
>
>

That`s right Jim - show em how `ard you really are LOL!


From: Angof on
(o: wrote:
> On 24 Feb, 21:04, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)>
> wrote:
>
>
> why dont i name the pub and you can turn up and voice your opinion, am
> sure the lads would love to hear what you think of me,

Baird's Bar is it? No thanks 'Timmy'.

>i will ask them to keep the music off just incase you get all offended.

Why would it offend me?





First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Next: Celtic's Political Dimension...