Dignity
in [Celtic]
|
From: Angof on 24 Feb 2007 04:47 (o: wrote: > On 24 Feb, 00:56, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> > wrote: > >> >> Just a bit. Jim probably thinks it's heinous though. > > Now maybe if you had shared your crime with the rest of the bears > instead of mailing timmy, we could have decided for our selves, but > instead you would rather ask the Mope's what they think as they would > agree with you anyway. I did mail FF and they agreed it was pathetic and sent me a new password. Problem is it didn't work. Have been told to re-register but haven't bothered. > > never mind angof, maybe the next time you will read the rules, which > apply to all users, not just Timmy I broke no rules. I just said something that someone who was really dense, possibly you, disagreed with.
From: (o: on 24 Feb 2007 05:04 On 24 Feb, 09:36, "Paddy" <p...(a)nospam.co.uk> wrote: pads wrote while obsessing > > You haven't got me, I'm still there. The Lounge, quite cosy, innit? what ever you say pads, atleast i know you will never be in the private area. > > > something you didnt know, the site is self policed the > > moderators do the banning, the Bears do the policing, so sniff sniff > > timmy, one phone call, text or PM and its goodnight Timmy. > > Oh is the 'Mark' you're on about? "Oh Mark, I love you, but we have to keep > Timmy away from the board"..LMAO. To be honest, it shows me what 'Mark' is > like ( and FF for that matter ) if they put a thicko like you in a position > of trust, LMAO !!!! > if you were on FF you would notice the names of the Moderators at the bottom, now it would be hard for a moderator to ban someone if they are not on, now in saying that what position of trust would that be that you think i was put in?
From: (o: on 24 Feb 2007 05:06 On 24 Feb, 09:42, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote: > (o: wrote: > > On 23 Feb, 22:11, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> > > wrote: > >> (o: wrote: > >>> On 23 Feb, 21:48, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for > >>> Mail)> wrote: > >>>> sme wrote: > >>>>> "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in > >>>>>news:45df5c1e$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net: > > >>>>>> sme wrote: > >>>>>>> ZB <z...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.2048f744dc5d77709896d0 > >>>>>>> @News.Individual.NET: > > >>>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>>> <45df5293$0$8715$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof > >>>>>>>> blurted... > >>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>>>>> <45df4168$0$8741$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof > >>>>>>>>>> blurted... > >>>>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>>>>>>> <45df256b$0$8713$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, > >>>>>>>>>>>> Angof blurted... > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp- > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader02.plus.net>, Angof blurted... > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after all your defending of those scum buckets :-) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out they were on there many a time. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lighten up. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Telling them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> life is not one big timmy conspiracy? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you > >>>>>>>>>>>> want, I wont tell anyone! > > >>>>>>>>>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able > >>>>>>>>>>> to put two and two together and will know my personal > >>>>>>>>>>> details. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Give me your addy. > > >>>>>>>>>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m > > >>>>>>>>> Sent. > > >>>>>>>> Strange, hasnt come through. zbhoy @ hotmail dot com. > > >>>>>>>> Thanks. > > >>>>>>> Was it for some petty reason or for you not going with their > >>>>>>> propoganda? > > >>>>>> What propaganda? > > >>>>> I've never been a member of FF so only going on what has been > >>>>> posted here about email campaigns and the likes. > > >>>> Don't listen to what you hear on here. FF has a huge membership and > >>>> it's a minority who are, shall we say 'colourful'. Unfortunately > >>>> they run the joint in the main. I'm not saying I disagree with them > >>>> all the time as well. The vast majority of posts are just the > >>>> normal football stuff. > > >>>>> You could post a general idea of what they banned you for, without > >>>>> going into great detail. It sounds as though they ban anyone who > >>>>> they think is a tim, which i take as not acting like one of them. > > >>>> Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator' thought > >>>> was a Tim on the wind up. I'd said much worse on many occasions in > >>>> the past. > > >>> i think your a tim, so blame me :-) you would not be my first.or my > >>> last. > > >> You're an idiot and couldn't catch a cold. You may have got me > >> banned but you are too thick to realise that a real Tim can easilly > >> avoid detection. > > > yes the ones that dont post, its too easy to catch the ones that do, > > got one who still posts here on his first post i know i have got pads > > and will :-) something you didnt know, the site is self policed the > > moderators do the banning, the Bears do the policing, so sniff sniff > > timmy, one phone call, text or PM and its goodnight Timmy. > > What you mean is you have a handful of morons who ban bears who don't agree > with them. Idiot. and you wonder why you got banned.
From: (o: on 24 Feb 2007 05:09 On 24 Feb, 09:42, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote: > (o: wrote: > > On 23 Feb, 22:28, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> > > wrote: > >> sme wrote: > >>> "(o:" <glesgab...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in > >>>news:1172268141.749781.214160(a)k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: > > >>> << snipped >> > > >>>>> Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator' thought > >>>>> was a Tim on the wind up. I'd said much worse on many occasions in > >>>>> the past. > > >>>> i think your a tim, so blame me :-) you would not be my first.or my > >>>> last. > > >>> lmao. You're admitting to being the idiot moderator??? You accuse > >>> everyone of being a tim who isn't as fucked up as you are! > > >> That about sums him up. Him and his ever shrinking bunch of cronies > >> are convinced that anyone who doesn't agree with them is a 'Timmy'. > >> It's quite sad really. > > > nothing to do with agreeing, you dont get banned for debating your > > point, you do for calling other users scum. > > I never called other users scum though Einstein. you called bears scum the other day, you just called them morons, you sir are an idiot.
From: Paddy on 24 Feb 2007 05:23
"(o:" <glesgabear(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:1172311478.075125.278480(a)s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com... > On 24 Feb, 09:36, "Paddy" <p...(a)nospam.co.uk> wrote: > > pads wrote while obsessing >> >> You haven't got me, I'm still there. The Lounge, quite cosy, innit? > > what ever you say pads, atleast i know you will never be in the > private area. You think? heh heh.... >> > something you didnt know, the site is self policed the >> > moderators do the banning, the Bears do the policing, so sniff sniff >> > timmy, one phone call, text or PM and its goodnight Timmy. >> >> Oh is the 'Mark' you're on about? "Oh Mark, I love you, but we have to >> keep >> Timmy away from the board"..LMAO. To be honest, it shows me what 'Mark' >> is >> like ( and FF for that matter ) if they put a thicko like you in a >> position >> of trust, LMAO !!!! >> > if you were on FF you would notice the names of the Moderators at the > bottom, now it would be hard for a moderator to ban someone if they > are not on, now in saying that what position of trust would that be > that you think i was put in? The position that he's actually gave a thicko like you his phone number and listens to you if you spot 'Timmy'......in fact, I think you're lying, I don't think you know 'Mark' at all. It's no big thing, thick, knowing 'Marks' phone number, no need for the lies. Paddy |