Dignity
in [Celtic]
|
From: (o: on 24 Feb 2007 04:23 On 23 Feb, 23:28, "Paddy" <p...(a)nospam.co.uk> wrote: > "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in messagenews:45df6689$0$8757$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net... > > > > > (o: wrote: > >> On 23 Feb, 21:48, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> > >> wrote: > >>> sme wrote: > >>>> "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in > >>>>news:45df5c1e$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net: > > >>>>> sme wrote: > >>>>>> ZB <z...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.2048f744dc5d77709896d0 > >>>>>> @News.Individual.NET: > > >>>>>>> In article <45df5293$0$8715$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, > >>>>>>> Angof blurted... > >>>>>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>>>> <45df4168$0$8741$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof > >>>>>>>>> blurted... > >>>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>>>>>> <45df256b$0$8713$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof > >>>>>>>>>>> blurted... > >>>>>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp- > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reader02.plus.net>, Angof blurted... > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after all your defending of those scum buckets :-) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed out > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they were on there many a time. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Lighten up. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Telling them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that > >>>>>>>>>>>>> life is not one big timmy conspiracy? > > >>>>>>>>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. > > >>>>>>>>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you > >>>>>>>>>>> want, I wont tell anyone! > > >>>>>>>>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able > >>>>>>>>>> to put two and two together and will know my personal details. > > >>>>>>>>>> Give me your addy. > > >>>>>>>>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m > > >>>>>>>> Sent. > > >>>>>>> Strange, hasnt come through. zbhoy @ hotmail dot com. > > >>>>>>> Thanks. > > >>>>>> Was it for some petty reason or for you not going with their > >>>>>> propoganda? > > >>>>> What propaganda? > > >>>> I've never been a member of FF so only going on what has been posted > >>>> here about email campaigns and the likes. > > >>> Don't listen to what you hear on here. FF has a huge membership and > >>> it's a minority who are, shall we say 'colourful'. Unfortunately > >>> they run the joint in the main. I'm not saying I disagree with them > >>> all the time as well. The vast majority of posts are just the normal > >>> football stuff. > > >>>> You could post a general idea of what they banned you for, without > >>>> going into great detail. It sounds as though they ban anyone who > >>>> they think is a tim, which i take as not acting like one of them. > > >>> Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator' thought > >>> was a Tim on the wind up. I'd said much worse on many occasions in > >>> the past. > > >> i think your a tim, so blame me :-) you would not be my first.or my > >> last. > > > You're an idiot and couldn't catch a cold. You may have got me banned but > > you are too thick to realise that a real Tim can easilly avoid detection. > > Like me !! Jim will never catch me, he's too thick. > > Paddy Tic toc tic toc :-) you're still obsessing.
From: (o: on 24 Feb 2007 04:32 On 24 Feb, 00:56, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote: > > Just a bit. Jim probably thinks it's heinous though. Now maybe if you had shared your crime with the rest of the bears instead of mailing timmy, we could have decided for our selves, but instead you would rather ask the Mope's what they think as they would agree with you anyway. never mind angof, maybe the next time you will read the rules, which apply to all users, not just Timmy
From: Paddy on 24 Feb 2007 04:36 "(o:" <glesgabear(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:1172307023.848563.195720(a)p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com... > On 23 Feb, 22:11, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> > wrote: >> (o: wrote: >> > On 23 Feb, 21:48, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> >> > wrote: >> >> sme wrote: >> >>> "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in >> >>>news:45df5c1e$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net: >> >> >>>> sme wrote: >> >>>>> ZB <z...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.2048f744dc5d77709896d0 >> >>>>> @News.Individual.NET: >> >> >>>>>> In article <45df5293$0$8715$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >> >>>>>> Angof blurted... >> >>>>>>> ZB wrote: >> >>>>>>>> In article >> >>>>>>>> <45df4168$0$8741$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof >> >>>>>>>> blurted... >> >>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> In article >> >>>>>>>>>> <45df256b$0$8713$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof >> >>>>>>>>>> blurted... >> >>>>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp- >> >>>>>>>>>>>> reader02.plus.net>, Angof blurted... >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> after all your defending of those scum buckets :-) >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed out >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> they were on there many a time. >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Lighten up. >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Telling them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that >> >>>>>>>>>>>> life is not one big timmy conspiracy? >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you >> >>>>>>>>>> want, I wont tell anyone! >> >> >>>>>>>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able >> >>>>>>>>> to put two and two together and will know my personal details. >> >> >>>>>>>>> Give me your addy. >> >> >>>>>>>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m >> >> >>>>>>> Sent. >> >> >>>>>> Strange, hasnt come through. zbhoy @ hotmail dot com. >> >> >>>>>> Thanks. >> >> >>>>> Was it for some petty reason or for you not going with their >> >>>>> propoganda? >> >> >>>> What propaganda? >> >> >>> I've never been a member of FF so only going on what has been posted >> >>> here about email campaigns and the likes. >> >> >> Don't listen to what you hear on here. FF has a huge membership and >> >> it's a minority who are, shall we say 'colourful'. Unfortunately >> >> they run the joint in the main. I'm not saying I disagree with them >> >> all the time as well. The vast majority of posts are just the normal >> >> football stuff. >> >> >>> You could post a general idea of what they banned you for, without >> >>> going into great detail. It sounds as though they ban anyone who >> >>> they think is a tim, which i take as not acting like one of them. >> >> >> Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator' thought >> >> was a Tim on the wind up. I'd said much worse on many occasions in >> >> the past. >> >> > i think your a tim, so blame me :-) you would not be my first.or my >> > last. >> >> You're an idiot and couldn't catch a cold. You may have got me banned but >> you are too thick to realise that a real Tim can easilly avoid detection. > > yes the ones that dont post, its too easy to catch the ones that do, > got one who still posts here on his first post i know i have got pads > and will :-) You haven't got me, I'm still there. The Lounge, quite cosy, innit? > something you didnt know, the site is self policed the > moderators do the banning, the Bears do the policing, so sniff sniff > timmy, one phone call, text or PM and its goodnight Timmy. Oh is the 'Mark' you're on about? "Oh Mark, I love you, but we have to keep Timmy away from the board"..LMAO. To be honest, it shows me what 'Mark' is like ( and FF for that matter ) if they put a thicko like you in a position of trust, LMAO !!!! Paddy
From: Angof on 24 Feb 2007 04:42 (o: wrote: > On 23 Feb, 22:11, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> > wrote: >> (o: wrote: >>> On 23 Feb, 21:48, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for >>> Mail)> wrote: >>>> sme wrote: >>>>> "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in >>>>> news:45df5c1e$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net: >> >>>>>> sme wrote: >>>>>>> ZB <z...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.2048f744dc5d77709896d0 >>>>>>> @News.Individual.NET: >> >>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>> <45df5293$0$8715$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof >>>>>>>> blurted... >>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>> <45df4168$0$8741$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof >>>>>>>>>> blurted... >>>>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>>>>>> <45df256b$0$8713$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>>>>>>>>>>> Angof blurted... >>>>>>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reader02.plus.net>, Angof blurted... >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> after all your defending of those scum buckets :-) >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> out they were on there many a time. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lighten up. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Telling them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that >>>>>>>>>>>>>> life is not one big timmy conspiracy? >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. >> >>>>>>>>>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you >>>>>>>>>>>> want, I wont tell anyone! >> >>>>>>>>>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able >>>>>>>>>>> to put two and two together and will know my personal >>>>>>>>>>> details. >> >>>>>>>>>>> Give me your addy. >> >>>>>>>>>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m >> >>>>>>>>> Sent. >> >>>>>>>> Strange, hasnt come through. zbhoy @ hotmail dot com. >> >>>>>>>> Thanks. >> >>>>>>> Was it for some petty reason or for you not going with their >>>>>>> propoganda? >> >>>>>> What propaganda? >> >>>>> I've never been a member of FF so only going on what has been >>>>> posted here about email campaigns and the likes. >> >>>> Don't listen to what you hear on here. FF has a huge membership and >>>> it's a minority who are, shall we say 'colourful'. Unfortunately >>>> they run the joint in the main. I'm not saying I disagree with them >>>> all the time as well. The vast majority of posts are just the >>>> normal football stuff. >> >>>>> You could post a general idea of what they banned you for, without >>>>> going into great detail. It sounds as though they ban anyone who >>>>> they think is a tim, which i take as not acting like one of them. >> >>>> Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator' thought >>>> was a Tim on the wind up. I'd said much worse on many occasions in >>>> the past. >> >>> i think your a tim, so blame me :-) you would not be my first.or my >>> last. >> >> You're an idiot and couldn't catch a cold. You may have got me >> banned but you are too thick to realise that a real Tim can easilly >> avoid detection. > > yes the ones that dont post, its too easy to catch the ones that do, > got one who still posts here on his first post i know i have got pads > and will :-) something you didnt know, the site is self policed the > moderators do the banning, the Bears do the policing, so sniff sniff > timmy, one phone call, text or PM and its goodnight Timmy. What you mean is you have a handful of morons who ban bears who don't agree with them. Idiot.
From: Angof on 24 Feb 2007 04:42
(o: wrote: > On 23 Feb, 22:28, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> > wrote: >> sme wrote: >>> "(o:" <glesgab...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in >>> news:1172268141.749781.214160(a)k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: >> >>> << snipped >> >> >>>>> Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator' thought >>>>> was a Tim on the wind up. I'd said much worse on many occasions in >>>>> the past. >> >>>> i think your a tim, so blame me :-) you would not be my first.or my >>>> last. >> >>> lmao. You're admitting to being the idiot moderator??? You accuse >>> everyone of being a tim who isn't as fucked up as you are! >> >> That about sums him up. Him and his ever shrinking bunch of cronies >> are convinced that anyone who doesn't agree with them is a 'Timmy'. >> It's quite sad really. > > > nothing to do with agreeing, you dont get banned for debating your > point, you do for calling other users scum. I never called other users scum though Einstein. |