Dignity
in [Celtic]
|
From: Angof on 23 Feb 2007 16:21 Moody Marco wrote: > Angof wrote: >> ZB wrote: >>> In article <45df4168$0$8741$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>> Angof blurted... >>>> ZB wrote: >>>>> In article <45df256b$0$8713$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>>>> Angof blurted... >>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>> In article >>>>>>> <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof >>>>>>> blurted... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny after all >>>>>>>>> your defending of those scum buckets :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed out they >>>>>>>> were on there many a time. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Lighten up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? Telling >>>>>>> them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that life is not >>>>>>> one big timmy conspiracy? >>>>>> >>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. >>>>> >>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you want, >>>>> I wont tell anyone! >>>> >>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able to put >>>> two and two together and will know my personal details. >>>> >>>> Give me your addy. >>> >>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m >> >> Sent. > > Me too! Me too! Re-sent...also to Marco.
From: Angof on 23 Feb 2007 16:26 sme wrote: > ZB <zb(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.2048f744dc5d77709896d0 > @News.Individual.NET: > >> In article <45df5293$0$8715$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >> Angof blurted... >>> ZB wrote: >>>> In article <45df4168$0$8741$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>>> Angof blurted... >>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>> In article <45df256b$0$8713$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>>>>> Angof blurted... >>>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>>> In article <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp- >>>>>>>> reader02.plus.net>, Angof blurted... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny after >>>>>>>>>> all your defending of those scum buckets :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed out they >>>>>>>>> were on there many a time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Lighten up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? Telling >>>>>>>> them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that life is not >>>>>>>> one big timmy conspiracy? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you >>>>>> want, I wont tell anyone! >>>>> >>>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able to >>>>> put two and two together and will know my personal details. >>>>> >>>>> Give me your addy. >>>> >>>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m >>> >>> Sent. >> >> Strange, hasnt come through. zbhoy @ hotmail dot com. >> >> Thanks. > > Was it for some petty reason or for you not going with their > propoganda? What propaganda?
From: sme on 23 Feb 2007 16:40 "Angof" <Mailfalger1(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in news:45df5c1e$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net: > sme wrote: >> ZB <zb(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.2048f744dc5d77709896d0 >> @News.Individual.NET: >> >>> In article <45df5293$0$8715$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>> Angof blurted... >>>> ZB wrote: >>>>> In article <45df4168$0$8741$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>>>> Angof blurted... >>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>> In article <45df256b$0$8713$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>>>>>> Angof blurted... >>>>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>>>> In article <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp- >>>>>>>>> reader02.plus.net>, Angof blurted... >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny after >>>>>>>>>>> all your defending of those scum buckets :-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed out they >>>>>>>>>> were on there many a time. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lighten up. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? Telling >>>>>>>>> them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that life is not >>>>>>>>> one big timmy conspiracy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you >>>>>>> want, I wont tell anyone! >>>>>> >>>>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able to >>>>>> put two and two together and will know my personal details. >>>>>> >>>>>> Give me your addy. >>>>> >>>>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m >>>> >>>> Sent. >>> >>> Strange, hasnt come through. zbhoy @ hotmail dot com. >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> Was it for some petty reason or for you not going with their >> propoganda? > > What propaganda? I've never been a member of FF so only going on what has been posted here about email campaigns and the likes. You could post a general idea of what they banned you for, without going into great detail. It sounds as though they ban anyone who they think is a tim, which i take as not acting like one of them. -- sme
From: Angof on 23 Feb 2007 16:48 sme wrote: > "Angof" <Mailfalger1(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in > news:45df5c1e$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net: > >> sme wrote: >>> ZB <zb(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.2048f744dc5d77709896d0 >>> @News.Individual.NET: >>> >>>> In article <45df5293$0$8715$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>>> Angof blurted... >>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>> In article <45df4168$0$8741$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, >>>>>> Angof blurted... >>>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>>> In article >>>>>>>> <45df256b$0$8713$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof >>>>>>>> blurted... >>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> In article <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp- >>>>>>>>>> reader02.plus.net>, Angof blurted... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny after >>>>>>>>>>>> all your defending of those scum buckets :-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed out >>>>>>>>>>> they were on there many a time. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Lighten up. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? Telling >>>>>>>>>> them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that life is not >>>>>>>>>> one big timmy conspiracy? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you >>>>>>>> want, I wont tell anyone! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able to >>>>>>> put two and two together and will know my personal details. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Give me your addy. >>>>>> >>>>>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m >>>>> >>>>> Sent. >>>> >>>> Strange, hasnt come through. zbhoy @ hotmail dot com. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>> >>> Was it for some petty reason or for you not going with their >>> propoganda? >> >> What propaganda? > > I've never been a member of FF so only going on what has been posted > here about email campaigns and the likes. Don't listen to what you hear on here. FF has a huge membership and it's a minority who are, shall we say 'colourful'. Unfortunately they run the joint in the main. I'm not saying I disagree with them all the time as well. The vast majority of posts are just the normal football stuff. > > You could post a general idea of what they banned you for, without > going into great detail. It sounds as though they ban anyone who they > think is a tim, which i take as not acting like one of them. Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator' thought was a Tim on the wind up. I'd said much worse on many occasions in the past.
From: (o: on 23 Feb 2007 17:02
On 23 Feb, 21:48, "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote: > sme wrote: > > "Angof" <Mailfalg...(a)yahoo.co.uk(no need for Mail)> wrote in > >news:45df5c1e$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net: > > >> sme wrote: > >>> ZB <z...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:MPG.2048f744dc5d77709896d0 > >>> @News.Individual.NET: > > >>>> In article <45df5293$0$8715$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, > >>>> Angof blurted... > >>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>> In article <45df4168$0$8741$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, > >>>>>> Angof blurted... > >>>>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>>>> In article > >>>>>>>> <45df256b$0$8713$ed261...(a)ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, Angof > >>>>>>>> blurted... > >>>>>>>>> ZB wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> In article <45deb897$0$8725$ed2619ec(a)ptn-nntp- > >>>>>>>>>> reader02.plus.net>, Angof blurted... > > >>>>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans Angof, this is just too funny after > >>>>>>>>>>>> all your defending of those scum buckets :-) > > >>>>>>>>>>> Wrong...I never defended any scum buckets...I pointed out > >>>>>>>>>>> they were on there many a time. > > >>>>>>>>>> Lighten up. > > >>>>>>>>>> C'mon, spill the beans, what did you get banned for? Telling > >>>>>>>>>> them red hand salutes were not acceptable or that life is not > >>>>>>>>>> one big timmy conspiracy? > > >>>>>>>>> It's far more terrible than that. > > >>>>>>>> Don't be such a tease! What was it? Send me an email if you > >>>>>>>> want, I wont tell anyone! > > >>>>>>> Ok..I don't particularly want to say as someone will be able to > >>>>>>> put two and two together and will know my personal details. > > >>>>>>> Give me your addy. > > >>>>>> z b h o y at h o t m a i l dot c o m > > >>>>> Sent. > > >>>> Strange, hasnt come through. zbhoy @ hotmail dot com. > > >>>> Thanks. > > >>> Was it for some petty reason or for you not going with their > >>> propoganda? > > >> What propaganda? > > > I've never been a member of FF so only going on what has been posted > > here about email campaigns and the likes. > > Don't listen to what you hear on here. FF has a huge membership and it's a > minority who are, shall we say 'colourful'. Unfortunately they run the joint > in the main. I'm not saying I disagree with them all the time as well. The > vast majority of posts are just the normal football stuff. > > > > > You could post a general idea of what they banned you for, without > > going into great detail. It sounds as though they ban anyone who they > > think is a tim, which i take as not acting like one of them. > > Well basically I said something that one idiot 'moderator' thought was a Tim > on the wind up. I'd said much worse on many occasions in the past. i think your a tim, so blame me :-) you would not be my first.or my last. |