Chelsea or United ...?
in [Manchester United]
|
From: chuck-spears on 26 Apr 2010 20:19 "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:lFoBn.251439$Vh1.189975(a)newsfe15.ams2... > > "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:4woBn.18342$zV.3853(a)newsfe27.ams2... >> >> "Udo Binsack" <udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:4dea1045-cc04-43f8-bfb0-318169d135b5(a)y30g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... >> On 26 Apr, 21:29, "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >>> "Udo Binsack" <udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>> >>> news:6c5b20ca-fe77-4726-a100-06be0652c16c(a)h11g2000vbo.googlegroups.com... >>> On 26 Apr, 20:10, "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> >>> >news:C0iBn.1926$lQ.885(a)newsfe03.ams2... >>> >>> > > "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>> > >news:nRhBn.116603$hx2.22816(a)newsfe08.ams2... >>> >>> > >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> > >>news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... >>> >>> > >>> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>> > >>>news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... >>> >>> > >>>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> > >>>>news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>> >>> > >>>>> <REDDEV...(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>> > >>>>>news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... >>> > >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" >>> > >>>>>> <lawrenc...(a)sky.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >>>>>>><REDDEV...(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>> > >>>>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... >>> > >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" >>> > >>>>>>>> <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal >>> > >>>>>>>>>difference. >>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. >>> >>> > >>>>>>>>>Not PMSL >>> >>> > >>>>>>>> Liverpool will bend over >>> >>> > >>>>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would >>> > >>>>>>>put >>> > >>>>>>>us >>> > >>>>>>>two >>> > >>>>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. >>> >>> > >>>>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be >>> > >>>>>>>i >>> > >>>>>>>point ahead >>> > >>>>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to >>> > >>>>>>>the >>> > >>>>>>>last >>> > >>>>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its >>> > >>>>>>>still >>> > >>>>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the >>> > >>>>>>>greatest >>> > >>>>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke >>> > >>>>>>>at >>> > >>>>>>>home. >>> >>> > >>>>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks >>> > >>>>>>>back >>> > >>>>>>>we >>> > >>>>>>>thought it was all over then. >>> >>> > >>>>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a >>> > >>>>>>>lot >>> > >>>>>>>of >>> > >>>>>>>love >>> > >>>>>>>between the two clubs. >>> >>> > >>>>>> Chelsea made us look silly? >>> >>> > >>>>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? >>> >>> > >>>>> Except that he didn't. >>> >>> > >>>> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give >>> > >>>> the >>> > >>>> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. >>> >>> > >>> We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority >>> > >>> that it >>> > >>> wasn't corruption. End of. >>> >>> > >> The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to >>> > >> give >>> > >> offside. >>> >>> > > No, the conclusion was that everyone with a rational thought process >>> > > agreed that he made a mistake. >>> >>> > > There, explained. >>> >>> > How could he have made the 'mistake', it was impossible under the >>> > circumstances, what do you think could have cause 'a mistake'? >>> >>> FFS, how many times do we have to explain this to you? >>> >>> I honestly hope this is simply the result of some childish tantrum you >>> still haven't got over and that you don't actually believe this >>> ridiculous idea you've concocted in your mind. >>> >>> "how many times do we have to explain this to you" >>> Well go ahead and explain how he made the 'error', just repeating 'human >>> error' isn't an explanation. Run us through how you came to your >>> conclusion. >> >> Twice now I've given you a list of plausible explanations - i don't >> intend doing it a third time. >> >> You have never given any explanation as to how you think the linesman >> could have made a mistake and I don't expect one from you. You tend to >> avoid answering direct questions. >> I don't have a theory, there are a few possiblities and a simple >> error, after watching the evidence, doesn't look the most likely. I >> merely stated that under the circumstances no one could explain why the >> linesman didn't give offside. > > After watching *what* evidence? Player was offside, he didn't give it. > What evidence specifically shows it wasn't an error? None but then those are your words, you need to read my post again. |