Chelsea or United ...?
in [Manchester United]
|
From: Mentalguy2k8 on 26 Apr 2010 15:31 "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:ZxlBn.35461$7R.7251(a)newsfe19.ams2... > > "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:C0iBn.1926$lQ.885(a)newsfe03.ams2... >> >> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:nRhBn.116603$hx2.22816(a)newsfe08.ams2... >>> >>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... >>>> >>>> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>>> news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... >>>>> >>>>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>>>>> >>>>>> <REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>> news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" >>>>>>> <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>><REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" >>>>>>>>> <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>Not PMSL >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Liverpool will bend over >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put >>>>>>>>us two >>>>>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i >>>>>>>>point ahead >>>>>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to the >>>>>>>>last >>>>>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its still >>>>>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the >>>>>>>>greatest >>>>>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at >>>>>>>>home. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks back >>>>>>>>we >>>>>>>>thought it was all over then. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot >>>>>>>>of love >>>>>>>>between the two clubs. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Chelsea made us look silly? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? >>>>>> >>>>>> Except that he didn't. >>>>> >>>>> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the >>>>> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. >>>> >>>> We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority that it >>>> wasn't corruption. End of. >>> >>> The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to give >>> offside. >> >> No, the conclusion was that everyone with a rational thought process >> agreed that he made a mistake. >> >> There, explained. > > > How could he have made the 'mistake', it was impossible under the > circumstances, what do you think could have cause 'a mistake'? It's called human error mate, get over it.
From: Udo Binsack on 26 Apr 2010 16:13 On 26 Apr, 15:57, "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... > > > > > > > "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > >news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... > > >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >>news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... > > >>> <REDDEV...(a)nospam.net> wrote in message > >>>news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... > >>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" > >>>> <lawrenc...(a)sky.com> wrote: > > >>>>><REDDEV...(a)nospam.net> wrote in message > >>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... > >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" > >>>>>> <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. > > >>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. > > >>>>>>>Not PMSL > > >>>>>> Liverpool will bend over > > >>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put us > >>>>>two > >>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. > > >>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i point > >>>>>ahead > >>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to the > >>>>>last > >>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its still > >>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the greatest > >>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at > >>>>>home. > > >>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks back we > >>>>>thought it was all over then. > > >>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot of > >>>>>love > >>>>>between the two clubs. > > >>>> Chelsea made us look silly? > > >>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? > > >>> Except that he didn't. > > >> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the > >> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. > > > We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority that it > > wasn't corruption. End of. > > The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to give > offside. The conclusion was that you couldn't find any justification for your silly notion that he saw it and refused to give it - other than the fact you need to grow up.
From: Udo Binsack on 26 Apr 2010 16:16 On 26 Apr, 20:10, "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote: > "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:C0iBn.1926$lQ.885(a)newsfe03.ams2... > > > > > > > "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > >news:nRhBn.116603$hx2.22816(a)newsfe08.ams2... > > >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >>news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... > > >>> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spe...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > >>>news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... > > >>>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... > > >>>>> <REDDEV...(a)nospam.net> wrote in message > >>>>>news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... > >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" > >>>>>> <lawrenc...(a)sky.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>><REDDEV...(a)nospam.net> wrote in message > >>>>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... > >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" > >>>>>>>> <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. > > >>>>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. > > >>>>>>>>>Not PMSL > > >>>>>>>> Liverpool will bend over > > >>>>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put us > >>>>>>>two > >>>>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. > > >>>>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i > >>>>>>>point ahead > >>>>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to the > >>>>>>>last > >>>>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its still > >>>>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the > >>>>>>>greatest > >>>>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at > >>>>>>>home. > > >>>>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks back > >>>>>>>we > >>>>>>>thought it was all over then. > > >>>>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot of > >>>>>>>love > >>>>>>>between the two clubs. > > >>>>>> Chelsea made us look silly? > > >>>>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? > > >>>>> Except that he didn't. > > >>>> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the > >>>> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. > > >>> We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority that it > >>> wasn't corruption. End of. > > >> The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to give > >> offside. > > > No, the conclusion was that everyone with a rational thought process > > agreed that he made a mistake. > > > There, explained. > > How could he have made the 'mistake', it was impossible under the > circumstances, what do you think could have cause 'a mistake'? FFS, how many times do we have to explain this to you? I honestly hope this is simply the result of some childish tantrum you still haven't got over and that you don't actually believe this ridiculous idea you've concocted in your mind.
From: Mentalguy2k8 on 26 Apr 2010 16:24 "Udo Binsack" <udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:6c5b20ca-fe77-4726-a100- >FFS, how many times do we have to explain this to you? >I honestly hope this is simply the result of some childish tantrum you >still haven't got over and that you don't actually believe this >ridiculous idea you've concocted in your mind. While it's a refreshing change to have less of the usual arrogance, I think some people are just keeping this alive so they'll have something to blame if they don't win the title.
From: chuck-spears on 26 Apr 2010 16:23
"Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:JSlBn.579584$2R.506571(a)newsfe11.ams2... > > "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:ZxlBn.35461$7R.7251(a)newsfe19.ams2... >> >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:C0iBn.1926$lQ.885(a)newsfe03.ams2... >>> >>> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>> news:nRhBn.116603$hx2.22816(a)newsfe08.ams2... >>>> >>>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... >>>>> >>>>> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>>>> news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... >>>>>> >>>>>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" >>>>>>>> <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>><REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" >>>>>>>>>> <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>Not PMSL >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Liverpool will bend over >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put >>>>>>>>>us two >>>>>>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i >>>>>>>>>point ahead >>>>>>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to >>>>>>>>>the last >>>>>>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its >>>>>>>>>still >>>>>>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the >>>>>>>>>greatest >>>>>>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at >>>>>>>>>home. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks >>>>>>>>>back we >>>>>>>>>thought it was all over then. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot >>>>>>>>>of love >>>>>>>>>between the two clubs. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chelsea made us look silly? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except that he didn't. >>>>>> >>>>>> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the >>>>>> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. >>>>> >>>>> We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority that it >>>>> wasn't corruption. End of. >>>> >>>> The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to >>>> give offside. >>> >>> No, the conclusion was that everyone with a rational thought process >>> agreed that he made a mistake. >>> >>> There, explained. >> >> >> How could he have made the 'mistake', it was impossible under the >> circumstances, what do you think could have cause 'a mistake'? > > It's called human error mate, get over it. At Stamford Bridge Rooney was though with just the goalkeeper to beat and was called offside but was a yard onside, that was an error, this one didn't look like an error as I can't believe from what I have seen, that an error could occur. With any error, in order to reduce the possibility of repeating that error, you look for reasons why the error occurred. What do you think caused this error, could the linesman have been in a better possition, could Drogba have been offside longer or by more than 2 yards or are you just assuming an error. Is there any wrong judgement in a game that you might consider not to be an error? |