Chelsea or United ...?
in [Manchester United]
|
From: chuck-spears on 26 Apr 2010 10:57 "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... > > "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... >> >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>> >>> <REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>> news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" >>>> <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>><REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" >>>>>> <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Not PMSL >>>>>>> >>>>>> Liverpool will bend over >>>>> >>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put us >>>>>two >>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. >>>>> >>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i point >>>>>ahead >>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to the >>>>>last >>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its still >>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the greatest >>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at >>>>>home. >>>>> >>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks back we >>>>>thought it was all over then. >>>>> >>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot of >>>>>love >>>>>between the two clubs. >>>>> >>>> Chelsea made us look silly? >>>> >>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? >>> >>> Except that he didn't. >> >> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the >> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. > > We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority that it > wasn't corruption. End of. The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to give offside.
From: chuck-spears on 26 Apr 2010 11:00 "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:83ll3oFgddU1(a)mid.individual.net... > chuck-spears explained : >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>> >>> <REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>> news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... >>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" >>>> <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>><REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" >>>>>> <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Not PMSL >>>>>>> >>>>>> Liverpool will bend over >>>>> >>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put us >>>>>two >>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. >>>>> >>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i point >>>>>ahead >>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to the >>>>>last >>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its still >>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the greatest >>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at >>>>>home. >>>>> >>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks back we >>>>>thought it was all over then. >>>>> >>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot of >>>>>love >>>>>between the two clubs. >>>>> >>>> Chelsea made us look silly? >>>> >>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? >>> >>> Except that he didn't. >> >> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the >> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. > > Give it up and find some dignity man ffs ! > > -- > Count Baldoni > > In hoc signo vinces > > It's not a question of dignity it's a question of truth and the truth is, no one could explain his decision not to give offside. Why do you have such a problem with the truth?
From: Mentalguy2k8 on 26 Apr 2010 11:09 "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:nRhBn.116603$hx2.22816(a)newsfe08.ams2... > > "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... >> >> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... >>> >>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>>> >>>> <REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>> news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" >>>>> <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>><REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" >>>>>>> <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Not PMSL >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Liverpool will bend over >>>>>> >>>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put us >>>>>>two >>>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. >>>>>> >>>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i point >>>>>>ahead >>>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to the >>>>>>last >>>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its still >>>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the greatest >>>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at >>>>>>home. >>>>>> >>>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks back >>>>>>we >>>>>>thought it was all over then. >>>>>> >>>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot of >>>>>>love >>>>>>between the two clubs. >>>>>> >>>>> Chelsea made us look silly? >>>>> >>>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? >>>> >>>> Except that he didn't. >>> >>> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the >>> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. >> >> We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority that it >> wasn't corruption. End of. > > The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to give > offside. No, the conclusion was that everyone with a rational thought process agreed that he made a mistake. There, explained.
From: Baldoni on 26 Apr 2010 13:01 chuck-spears formulated the question : > "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... >> >> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... >>> >>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>>> >>>> <REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>> news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... >>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" >>>>> <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>><REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" >>>>>>> <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Not PMSL >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Liverpool will bend over >>>>>> >>>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put us >>>>>> two >>>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. >>>>>> >>>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i point >>>>>> ahead >>>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to the >>>>>> last >>>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its still >>>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the greatest >>>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at home. >>>>>> >>>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks back we >>>>>>thought it was all over then. >>>>>> >>>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot of >>>>>> love >>>>>>between the two clubs. >>>>>> >>>>> Chelsea made us look silly? >>>>> >>>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? >>>> >>>> Except that he didn't. >>> >>> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the >>> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. >> >> We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority that it >> wasn't corruption. End of. > > The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to give > offside. Maybe it was an act of God that caused him not to give it. In fact I am pretty much sure that it was indeed an act of God ! -- Count Baldoni In hoc signo vinces
From: chuck-spears on 26 Apr 2010 15:10
"Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:C0iBn.1926$lQ.885(a)newsfe03.ams2... > > "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message > news:nRhBn.116603$hx2.22816(a)newsfe08.ams2... >> >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:QVgBn.33921$7R.2809(a)newsfe19.ams2... >>> >>> "chuck-spears" <chuck-spears(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message >>> news:PKfBn.30700$bn4.21014(a)newsfe20.ams2... >>>> >>>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:Vo0Bn.791484$DL1.33077(a)newsfe25.ams2... >>>>> >>>>> <REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:a509t5h4ncfg3355mrpr28vagav4jm0gti(a)4ax.com... >>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:41:50 +0100, "Lawrence Jenkins" >>>>>> <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>><REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:qdu8t55oiipkeqtuj2a8djgnl309d51mgp(a)4ax.com... >>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:08:52 +0100, "Red Rackham" >>>>>>>> <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Well, I don't think we're going to do them on goal difference. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Unless Liverpool put 8 past them. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Not PMSL >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Liverpool will bend over >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Liverpool have to win and we win against Sunderland that would put us >>>>>>>two >>>>>>>points ahead win our last game against Stoke and that's it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If Chelsea draw at Anfield and we beat Sunderland we should be i >>>>>>>point ahead >>>>>>>and only needing to beat Stoke. If we both win then its down to the >>>>>>>last >>>>>>>games of the season at 4pm at our respective home grounds. Its still >>>>>>>possible chelsea have to beat Liverpool otherwise we have the >>>>>>>greatest >>>>>>>chance. Of course I'm asuming we beat Sunderland away and Stoke at >>>>>>>home. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Lets face it when Chelsea made us look silly a couple of weeks back >>>>>>>we >>>>>>>thought it was all over then. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Will Liverpool roll over and die? We'll see but there's not a lot of >>>>>>>love >>>>>>>between the two clubs. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Chelsea made us look silly? >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean a linesman made himself look corrupt? >>>>> >>>>> Except that he didn't. >>>> >>>> Except that he did or maybe you can explain why he didn't give the >>>> totally obvious offside that he had a clear view of. >>> >>> We've covered this already. It's accepted by the vast majority that it >>> wasn't corruption. End of. >> >> The conclusion was that no one could explain his decision not to give >> offside. > > No, the conclusion was that everyone with a rational thought process > agreed that he made a mistake. > > There, explained. How could he have made the 'mistake', it was impossible under the circumstances, what do you think could have cause 'a mistake'? |