From: Google Beta User on
On Apr 18, 7:41 am, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> Right. So you just want to take a period where Chelsea have already spent
> well over half a billion quid and pat yourself on the back because they
> haven't spent any more.
>
> Well done.

No. What I'm saying is they came in and spent. Got a good manager.
And then they passed you, Mourinho stormed the league, and set a new
standard. It could've fallen apart but it didn't.

In response you lot stepped it up a notch, nad matched them. Part of
that was in turn spending even *more* than Chelsea themselves. Over
your current run, you'v spent more than them.

However, the fact that you spent money doesn't make you illegitimate.
From: JAB on
On 18/04/2010 5:32 PM, Google Beta User wrote:
> On Apr 18, 7:41 am, "Red Rackham"<ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Right. So you just want to take a period where Chelsea have already spent
>> well over half a billion quid and pat yourself on the back because they
>> haven't spent any more.
>>
>> Well done.
>
> No. What I'm saying is they came in and spent. Got a good manager.
> And then they passed you, Mourinho stormed the league, and set a new
> standard. It could've fallen apart but it didn't.
>
> In response you lot stepped it up a notch, nad matched them. Part of
> that was in turn spending even *more* than Chelsea themselves. Over
> your current run, you'v spent more than them.
>
> However, the fact that you spent money doesn't make you illegitimate.

Stop confusing Le Dieu with facts ... it's not his strong point.
From: Graf Finklestein on
On 18 Apr, 12:41, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Graf Finklestein" <udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> Feel free to post anything you feel disproves the above.
>
> Right. So you just want to take a period where Chelsea have already spent
> well over half a billion quid and pat yourself on the back because they
> haven't spent any more.
>
> Well done.
>
> PMSL

GBU: "I have a hunch since about 2007, coinciding with your current
run of three straight titles, you've been bigger spenders than them."
Timmy : "These things are best not done on 'hunches'. Hard facts are
necessary. They will tell you that Chelsea have *far* outspent
United."

Then I come along and prove you to be lying again, and lo and behold,
you start jabbering about something completely different.

Still too easy, Timmy - still far too easy.
From: Graf Finklestein on
On 18 Apr, 17:32, Google Beta User <wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 18, 7:41 am, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> However, the fact that you spent money doesn't make you illegitimate.

No, there are other reasons that make him illegitimate.
From: Google Beta User on
On Apr 18, 1:53 pm, Graf Finklestein <udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

> > On Apr 18, 7:41 am, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > However, the fact that you spent money doesn't make you illegitimate.
>
> No, there are other reasons that make him illegitimate.

I meant the club, clearly he's not arguing in good faith on United's
recent spending.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Prev: 2014 World Cup in Brazil
Next: Parking the bus