While I still feel like it ...
in [Chelsea]
|
Prev: 2014 World Cup in Brazil
Next: Parking the bus
From: Red Rackham on 25 Apr 2010 10:40 "JAB" <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message news:LtYAn.93354$1%7.59703(a)newsfe07.ams2... > On 25/04/2010 3:35 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:wpYAn.93352$1%7.7162(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>> On 25/04/2010 3:16 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>> news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... >>>>>>>>> funny >>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <yawns> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu ... >>>>> now >>>>> I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm around >>>>> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all >>>>> that >>>>> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >>>>> >>>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >>>>> that you realise? >>>> >>>> >>>> Yawn. >>>> >>>> Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? >>>> >>>> PMSL >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that I >>> go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks >>> it >>> is. >>> >> >> >> Which fact is that JAB? >> >> You seem to be confusing yourself in your embarrassment at not actually >> supporting the team you bore on about so much. >> >> TIA >> >> > > No I'm going to the pub in ten minutes to watch the game ... JAB, you said you've shown another of my facts to be bollocks. Which fact Jab?
From: JAB on 25 Apr 2010 13:35 On 25/04/2010 3:40 PM, Red Rackham wrote: > "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message > news:LtYAn.93354$1%7.59703(a)newsfe07.ams2... >> On 25/04/2010 3:35 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>> news:wpYAn.93352$1%7.7162(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>> On 25/04/2010 3:16 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... >>>>>>>>>> funny >>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <yawns> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu ... >>>>>> now >>>>>> I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm around >>>>>> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all >>>>>> that >>>>>> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >>>>>> >>>>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>>>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >>>>>> that you realise? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yawn. >>>>> >>>>> Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? >>>>> >>>>> PMSL >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that I >>>> go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks >>>> it >>>> is. >>>> >>> >>> >>> Which fact is that JAB? >>> >>> You seem to be confusing yourself in your embarrassment at not actually >>> supporting the team you bore on about so much. >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> >> >> No I'm going to the pub in ten minutes to watch the game ... > > > JAB, you said you've shown another of my facts to be bollocks. > > Which fact Jab? > >>>>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>>>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >>>>>> that you realise? Do I really need to say which of you facts have been shown to be bollocks?
From: Red Rackham on 25 Apr 2010 13:37 "JAB" <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message news:q3%An.941314$Dy7.906770(a)newsfe26.ams2... > On 25/04/2010 3:40 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:LtYAn.93354$1%7.59703(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>> On 25/04/2010 3:35 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>> news:wpYAn.93352$1%7.7162(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>> On 25/04/2010 3:16 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>>> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>>>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... >>>>>>>>>>> funny >>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <yawns> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> now >>>>>>> I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm >>>>>>> around >>>>>>> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>>>>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> that you realise? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yawn. >>>>>> >>>>>> Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? >>>>>> >>>>>> PMSL >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that >>>>> I >>>>> go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks >>>>> it >>>>> is. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Which fact is that JAB? >>>> >>>> You seem to be confusing yourself in your embarrassment at not actually >>>> supporting the team you bore on about so much. >>>> >>>> TIA >>>> >>>> >>> >>> No I'm going to the pub in ten minutes to watch the game ... >> >> >> JAB, you said you've shown another of my facts to be bollocks. >> >> Which fact Jab? >> > > >>>>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete > >>>>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out > to you > >>>>>> that you realise? > > Do I really need to say which of you facts have been shown to be bollocks? Yes. You do. I said, 'shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge'. You said, ' Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that I go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks it is. So again I ask. Which fact have you shown to be bollocks here JAB? TIA
From: JAB on 25 Apr 2010 14:06 On 25/04/2010 6:37 PM, Red Rackham wrote: > "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message > news:q3%An.941314$Dy7.906770(a)newsfe26.ams2... >> On 25/04/2010 3:40 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>> news:LtYAn.93354$1%7.59703(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>> On 25/04/2010 3:35 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:wpYAn.93352$1%7.7162(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>> On 25/04/2010 3:16 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>>>> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>>>>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... >>>>>>>>>>>> funny >>>>>>>>>>>> that. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> <yawns> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu >>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>> now >>>>>>>> I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm >>>>>>>> around >>>>>>>> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>>>>>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> that you realise? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yawn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PMSL >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that >>>>>> I >>>>>> go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks >>>>>> it >>>>>> is. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Which fact is that JAB? >>>>> >>>>> You seem to be confusing yourself in your embarrassment at not actually >>>>> supporting the team you bore on about so much. >>>>> >>>>> TIA >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> No I'm going to the pub in ten minutes to watch the game ... >>> >>> >>> JAB, you said you've shown another of my facts to be bollocks. >>> >>> Which fact Jab? >>> >> >>>>>>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>>>>>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out >> to you >>>>>>>> that you realise? >> >> Do I really need to say which of you facts have been shown to be bollocks? > > > > Yes. You do. > > I said, 'shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge'. > > You said, ' Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually > stated that I go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the > bollocks it is. > > So again I ask. Which fact have you shown to be bollocks here JAB? > > TIA > > Well I think we now have an answer - you think your "facts" are true and when they are pointed out to be complete bollocks you squirm to try and prove why they are true ... Le Dieu at his best ... LOL Carry on posting your "facts" as it always gives me a laugh ...
From: Baldoni on 25 Apr 2010 14:08
JAB submitted this idea : > On 25/04/2010 3:16 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny >>>>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> <yawns> >>>> >>>> >>>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu ... now >>> I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm around >>> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all that >>> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >>> >>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >>> that you realise? >> >> >> Yawn. >> >> Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? >> >> PMSL >> >> > > > Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that I go > to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks it is. > > Anyway back to the question ... > > "One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete bollocks > when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you that you > realise?" > > I look forward to you all so honest reply ... There is no reason for you to not go JAB as the tickets are always on general sale ! -- Count Baldoni In hoc signo vinces |