Prev: 2014 World Cup in Brazil
Next: Parking the bus
From: Red Rackham on 25 Apr 2010 10:27 "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:... > > "JAB" <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message > news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny >>>>>> that. >>>> >>>> <yawns> >>> >>> >>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>> >>> >> >> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu ... >> now I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm around >> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all that >> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >> >> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >> that you realise? > > > Yawn. > > Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? > > PMSL Jab? Jab? No, he's left for the game. BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
From: JAB on 25 Apr 2010 10:34 On 25/04/2010 3:16 PM, Red Rackham wrote: > "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message > news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny >>>>>> that. >>>> >>>> <yawns> >>> >>> >>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>> >>> >> >> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu ... now >> I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm around >> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all that >> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >> >> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >> that you realise? > > > Yawn. > > Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? > > PMSL > > Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that I go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks it is. Anyway back to the question ... "One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you that you realise?" I look forward to you all so honest reply ...
From: Red Rackham on 25 Apr 2010 10:35 "JAB" <nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message news:wpYAn.93352$1%7.7162(a)newsfe07.ams2... > On 25/04/2010 3:16 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny >>>>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> <yawns> >>>> >>>> >>>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu ... >>> now >>> I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm around >>> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all that >>> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >>> >>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >>> that you realise? >> >> >> Yawn. >> >> Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? >> >> PMSL >> >> > > > Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that I > go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks it > is. > Which fact is that JAB? You seem to be confusing yourself in your embarrassment at not actually supporting the team you bore on about so much. TIA
From: JAB on 25 Apr 2010 10:36 On 25/04/2010 3:27 PM, Red Rackham wrote: > "Red Rackham"<ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:... >> >> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >> news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny >>>>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> <yawns> >>>> >>>> >>>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu ... >>> now I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm around >>> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all that >>> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >>> >>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >>> that you realise? >> >> >> Yawn. >> >> Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? >> >> PMSL > > > Jab? Jab? > > No, he's left for the game. > > BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH > > BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH Well it would be if I claimed to be a season ticket holder but as I've actually posted the amount of games I go to it's just another Le Dieu "fact" shown up for the bollocks that it is. Then again what can I expect for you when you actually posted evidence that proves you are wrong ...
From: JAB on 25 Apr 2010 10:38
On 25/04/2010 3:35 PM, Red Rackham wrote: > "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message > news:wpYAn.93352$1%7.7162(a)newsfe07.ams2... >> On 25/04/2010 3:16 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>> news:H1YAn.93350$1%7.35767(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>> On 25/04/2010 3:01 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>> "JAB"<nochance(a)nohope.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:NFXAn.93349$1%7.39680(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>>>>> On 25/04/2010 2:08 PM, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>>>>> Interesting enough for you to reply to it I see Le Dieu ... funny >>>>>>>> that. >>>>>> >>>>>> <yawns> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Can't all be as entertaining as you JAB. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Any more interesting "facts" that you've forgotten to post Le Dieu ... >>>> now >>>> I always find them a laugh especially the bit where you squirm around >>>> trying to show that you were right even though it's obvious to all that >>>> you're totally and utterly wrong yet again. >>>> >>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >>>> that you realise? >>> >>> >>> Yawn. >>> >>> Shouldn't you be at Stamford Bridge? >>> >>> PMSL >>> >>> >> >> >> Have I ever said that I go to all games or have I actually stated that I >> go to some games ... yet another Le Dieu "fact" shown for the bollocks it >> is. >> > > > Which fact is that JAB? > > You seem to be confusing yourself in your embarrassment at not actually > supporting the team you bore on about so much. > > TIA > > No I'm going to the pub in ten minutes to watch the game ... are you claiming that all the Man U fans who don't go to every single game are an embarrassment to the team you support ... I hope you mention that to Steve H next time he's about ... Anywat back to the question ... >>>> One thing I did wonder, do you know that your "facts" are complete >>>> bollocks when you post them or is it only when it's pointed out to you >>>> that you realise? |