From: SteveH on
Lescor <lescor(a)btinternet.com> wrote:

> The original story of the 10 min go slow was in The Mail Online

Must be true then.
--
SteveH
From: SteveH on
Diablos Rojos <diablos_r0j0s(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> An emotional attachment to a game where you claim to follow nobody, you're
> right I find it quite strange but to be perfectly frank I think you're
> alleged impartiallity is absolute bollocks.

I was under the impression he was a johnny come lately Chelski fan.
--
SteveH
From: Google Beta User on
On Mar 10, 2:26 pm, italian...(a)gmail.com (SteveH) wrote:
:
> > An emotional attachment to a game where you claim to follow nobody, you're
> > right I find it quite strange but to be perfectly frank I think you're
> > alleged impartiallity is absolute bollocks.
>
> I was under the impression he was a johnny come lately Chelski fan.

Correct.

He knows football history, and is "cultured" (whtatever that means)
but I've suspected since he burst onto the scene that he's an
undercover Chelski fan.

From: Lescor on


"SteveH" <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1jf5km5.1v3mjdvbsvec6N%italiancar(a)gmail.com...
> Lescor <lescor(a)btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>> The original story of the 10 min go slow was in The Mail Online
>
> Must be true then.
> --
> SteveH


Maybe not. That was the reason I posted it as a question.

LC

From: Lescor on


"SteveH" <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1jf5kne.7ghvds1gbd5hhN%italiancar(a)gmail.com...
> Diablos Rojos <diablos_r0j0s(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> An emotional attachment to a game where you claim to follow nobody,
>> you're
>> right I find it quite strange but to be perfectly frank I think you're
>> alleged impartiallity is absolute bollocks.
>
> I was under the impression he was a johnny come lately Chelski fan.
> --
> SteveH

I was an" Arsenal fan" in one of my rare visits to that hardly used
ChelseaNG,
a" scouse koppite" or similar very frequenty in this and the Arsenal
group
and" Man U scum "in the Liverpool NG........and a secret Everton fan too.

Seems that at least the posters have something in common. Despite many
favourable comments, anything which smacks of criticism just has to be
part of a secret agenda and not to be taken on face value.

A bit pathetic mate.


LC