Prev: Nigeria suspends national football club
Next: Two good thing about the FIFA 2010 World Cup
From: SteveH on 1 Jul 2010 12:21
RickyBobby <nascar42(a)cox.net> wrote:

> If he could kick the ball he would be on
> offense instead of defense.

Now, I realise you're trolling, but that's fucked up even for you.
--
SteveH
From: RickyBobby on 1 Jul 2010 12:23


"SteveH" <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1jkyo6z.1elk2oc1g9tlybN%italiancar(a)gmail.com...
> RickyBobby <nascar42(a)cox.net> wrote:
>
>> If he could kick the ball he would be on
>> offense instead of defense.
>
> Now, I realise you're trolling, but that's fucked up even for you.
> --
> SteveH

I am stating facts as I see them or as I hear the experts say them. When a
defender takes a kick you know up front that he will miss. This is not
exactly quantum physics here.

From: Mentalguy2k8 on 1 Jul 2010 12:29

"RickyBobby" <nascar42(a)cox.net> wrote in message
news:l4OdnQJQMaDBXLHRnZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d(a)giganews.com...
>
>
> "SteveH" <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1jkyo6z.1elk2oc1g9tlybN%italiancar(a)gmail.com...
>> RickyBobby <nascar42(a)cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> If he could kick the ball he would be on
>>> offense instead of defense.
>>
>> Now, I realise you're trolling, but that's fucked up even for you.
>> --
>> SteveH
>
> I am stating facts as I see them or as I hear the experts say them. When
> a defender takes a kick you know up front that he will miss. This is not
> exactly quantum physics here.

I think Roberto Carlos might have something to say about that...

From: SteveH on 1 Jul 2010 12:38
RickyBobby <nascar42(a)cox.net> wrote:

> "SteveH" <italiancar(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1jkyo6z.1elk2oc1g9tlybN%italiancar(a)gmail.com...
> > RickyBobby <nascar42(a)cox.net> wrote:
> >
> >> If he could kick the ball he would be on
> >> offense instead of defense.
> >
> > Now, I realise you're trolling, but that's fucked up even for you.
> > --
> > SteveH
>
> I am stating facts as I see them or as I hear the experts say them. When a
> defender takes a kick you know up front that he will miss. This is not
> exactly quantum physics here.

But it's obviously far too complex for your lonely brain cell to
understand.
--
SteveH
From: Baldoni on 2 Jul 2010 05:49
NealR2000 has brought this to us :
> On Jul 1, 10:07�am, "RickyBobby" <nasca...(a)cox.net> wrote:
>> How much farther did Lampard have to put the ball into the goal in order for
>> it to count? �I thought the rule was that the entire ball had to be past the
>> entire goal line. �It was clearly that. �So how much farther into the goal
>> would the ball have to be to count?
>
> It didn't need to go any further. It was over the line. No-one is
> disputing this now. The goal should have been given. The ref and
> linesmen were not in a position to have seen this. The German
> goalkeeper clearly saw it cross the line. He admits this now. In the
> more honest days of football, the keeper would have simply left the
> ball where it was, having seen it cross the line. Unfortunately,
> honesty in sports is a thing of the past

Not quite Daniele De Rossi hand-balled a ball into the net in a match
Roma was playing in. The ref gave the goal but De Rossi informed the
ref that he put the ball in the net with his hand. Therefore the ref
disallowed the goal. Roma went on to win the match 2-1.

--
Count Baldoni


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Nigeria suspends national football club
Next: Two good thing about the FIFA 2010 World Cup