World Cup opener ends in a draw
in [Manchester United]
|
From: RickyBobby on 12 Jun 2010 04:37 "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message news:87gv05F9a1U1(a)mid.individual.net... > RickyBobby expressed precisely : >> >> "Swerve" <bill.liles(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:257d5f9f-e45a-4ee5-94ce-631b86aa1a5f(a)z8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... >>> On 11 June, 18:35, "RickyBobby" <nasca...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> I think next time they should expand it to 64 teams. 32 is not very >>>> many >>>> when there are over 200 nations that play football. If it it reputed >>>> to be >>>> the World's game then it should be more inclusive. >>>> >>> >>> OK enough. >>> >>> Are you really this thick, or is it just an act? >>> >>> Serious question. >> >> >> The second game was even worse than the opener. Watching the grounds >> crew mow the grass into that nice pattern would have more interesting. > > Uruguay were poor in the midfield but defended well. To be honest I think > they set out to play defensively and settle for the draw in the hope that > they can pick up the points against the other teams in the group. > > -- > Count Baldoni > > They waited four years to play a game and then they did not even try to win? I do not even know what to say about that.
From: Baldoni on 12 Jun 2010 04:45 RickyBobby explained : > > "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:87gv05F9a1U1(a)mid.individual.net... >> RickyBobby expressed precisely : >>> >>> "Swerve" <bill.liles(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:257d5f9f-e45a-4ee5-94ce-631b86aa1a5f(a)z8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... >>>> On 11 June, 18:35, "RickyBobby" <nasca...(a)cox.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I think next time they should expand it to 64 teams. 32 is not very >>>>> many >>>>> when there are over 200 nations that play football. If it it reputed to >>>>> be >>>>> the World's game then it should be more inclusive. >>>>> >>>> >>>> OK enough. >>>> >>>> Are you really this thick, or is it just an act? >>>> >>>> Serious question. >>> >>> >>> The second game was even worse than the opener. Watching the grounds crew >>> mow the grass into that nice pattern would have more interesting. >> >> Uruguay were poor in the midfield but defended well. To be honest I think >> they set out to play defensively and settle for the draw in the hope that >> they can pick up the points against the other teams in the group. >> >> -- Count Baldoni >> >> > > They waited four years to play a game and then they did not even try to win? > I do not even know what to say about that. That's football for you. Just wait until England get nervous and freeze like they normally do. There is a glimmer of hope though as Fabio Capello is the manager. -- Count Baldoni
From: Cleatarrior on 13 Jun 2010 14:53 On 06/12/2010 01:37 AM, RACIST RickyBobby wrote: > > 06/09/2010 01:50 PM alt.sports.football.pro.denver-broncos 70.170.107.110 newsfe13.iad 1276117100 70.170.107.110 (Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:58:20 UTC) newsmaster(a)cox.net "So where do you find piracy outside of Africa? Where do you find slavery outside of Africa? I think that their minds are sort of hardwired more towards immediate gratification and less towards long term benefits. But bear with me a minute here. There are no rules. There really are no rules chiseled into stone anywhere. People do what they want to do for as long as they live and then they die. Perhaps the "white people" in Europe have a stable and safe society because that is what they want and the "black people" in Africa have unstable and unsafe societies because they would rather live in the moment. There is no "rule" that I know of that says that the one thing is more right than the other thing. Perhaps the African practices of adolescent female genital mutilation and the killing and eating of Albinos is really a good thing. Black people or African people do seem to really be into violence towards anyone weaker than themselves. In a traditional African society adult men do not work. Only women and children work while adult men stand around and talk about important matters with other men. Fine by me. That is how their society works and it has been working that way for 5,000 years and it can continue to work that way for 5,000 more years. This is my order for the goodness of people... Best: Buddhists, Shinto, Hindu they are the least violent Second best: Jewish and Christian Worst: Islams and blacks Your opinion may vary. But you can have a billion Hindus in India and another two billion Buddhists in Asia and they are not all set to killing each other all of the time. The Christians and Jewish people are always on hair trigger to kill somebody who threatens them. The blacks and Islams are always killing somebody full time. Sort of a thumbnail sketch but you get the idea. There is no right and wrong. There is only what you do."
From: Cleatarrior on 13 Jun 2010 14:53 On 06/12/2010 12:49 AM, RACIST RickyBobby wrote: > > 06/09/2010 01:50 PM alt.sports.football.pro.denver-broncos 70.170.107.110 newsfe13.iad 1276117100 70.170.107.110 (Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:58:20 UTC) newsmaster(a)cox.net "So where do you find piracy outside of Africa? Where do you find slavery outside of Africa? I think that their minds are sort of hardwired more towards immediate gratification and less towards long term benefits. But bear with me a minute here. There are no rules. There really are no rules chiseled into stone anywhere. People do what they want to do for as long as they live and then they die. Perhaps the "white people" in Europe have a stable and safe society because that is what they want and the "black people" in Africa have unstable and unsafe societies because they would rather live in the moment. There is no "rule" that I know of that says that the one thing is more right than the other thing. Perhaps the African practices of adolescent female genital mutilation and the killing and eating of Albinos is really a good thing. Black people or African people do seem to really be into violence towards anyone weaker than themselves. In a traditional African society adult men do not work. Only women and children work while adult men stand around and talk about important matters with other men. Fine by me. That is how their society works and it has been working that way for 5,000 years and it can continue to work that way for 5,000 more years. This is my order for the goodness of people... Best: Buddhists, Shinto, Hindu they are the least violent Second best: Jewish and Christian Worst: Islams and blacks Your opinion may vary. But you can have a billion Hindus in India and another two billion Buddhists in Asia and they are not all set to killing each other all of the time. The Christians and Jewish people are always on hair trigger to kill somebody who threatens them. The blacks and Islams are always killing somebody full time. Sort of a thumbnail sketch but you get the idea. There is no right and wrong. There is only what you do."
From: Diablos Rojos on 14 Jun 2010 03:47
"Swerve" <bill.liles(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:257d5f9f-e45a-4ee5-94ce-631b86aa1a5f(a)z8g2000yqz.googlegroups.com... On 11 June, 18:35, "RickyBobby" <nasca...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > I think next time they should expand it to 64 teams. 32 is not very many > when there are over 200 nations that play football. If it it reputed to be > the World's game then it should be more inclusive. > OK enough. Are you really this thick, or is it just an act? Serious question. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's an act, no yank could genuinely be this ignorant about sarcker and the world in general outside THE U S of A. |