From: Mart van de Wege on 11 Aug 2010 00:50 RED DEVIL <manutd11XX(a)bellsouth.net> writes: > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:58:59 +0200, Mart van de Wege > <mvdwege(a)mail.com> wrote: > >>RED DEVIL <manutd11XX(a)bellsouth.net> writes: >> >>> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:30:49 +0200, Mart van de Wege >>> <mvdwege(a)mail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>RED DEVIL <manutd11XX(a)bellsouth.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:01:53 +1000, "The Scrutineer" >>>>> <vlade4(a)bigpond.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"Lawrence13" <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:0be492b3-4200-4060-8278-1b8b49938dcd(a)w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com... >>>>>>> On Aug 9, 12:31 am, Google Beta User <wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> probably 13-18m pound range. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/aug/08/manchester-united-mesu... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Come on, why would according to Red Devil, Fergie spend all that money >>>>>>> and a poor mans Darren Fletcher. >>>>>> >>>>>>The academy isn't producing what it once did!!! >>>>> >>>>> Our recent trophy hauls would suggest otherwise >>>> >>>>I have no dog in this fight, so don't take this the wrong way: your >>>>statement does *not* disprove his. The trophies are not necessarily >>>>correlated with academy success. In fact, a case could be made that >>>>short term success can be gained by investing in buying players. >>>> >>>>Mart >>> >>> It's a fact that most United starting lineups contain at least 50% of >>> players that have graduated through the youth system. Compare that >>> with any other successful English teams >> >>Oh sure. And I'm quite willing to believe that their youth scheme is >>part of their success. >> >>However, logically your statement is not a refutation of the >>original. It is quite possible that the recent trophy hauls are due to >>smart buying of players. Without an exhaustive analysis of each player's >>part in the successes, you can't make definitive statements. >> >>Mart > > Manchester United have always had an excellent youth system, Well yes, I know. Again, that's not the point. Are you sure you actually read what I wrote? Mart -- "We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes." --- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
From: JAB on 11 Aug 2010 01:33 On 11/08/2010 1:16 AM, Legend-11 wrote: > Ahh, but if one was to go with the theory of quantum mechanics, it would > be both here and there at the same time. Surely you wouldn't quite know where it was or you wouldn't quite know how fast it was going?
From: RED DEVIL on 11 Aug 2010 01:50 On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:50:53 +0200, Mart van de Wege <mvdwege(a)mail.com> wrote: >The academy isn't producing what it once did!!! Is what I read RED DEVIL
From: Mart van de Wege on 11 Aug 2010 11:58 RED DEVIL <manutd11XX(a)bellsouth.net> writes: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:50:53 +0200, Mart van de Wege > <mvdwege(a)mail.com> wrote: > >>The academy isn't producing what it once did!!! > > Is what I read Well, I hope you realise those weren't *my* words. However, the way you snipped the attribution lines, they now appear to be, thank you very much. Mart -- "We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes." --- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
From: RED DEVIL on 12 Aug 2010 12:50
On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:01:53 +1000, "The Scrutineer" <vlade4(a)bigpond.com> wrote: > > >"Lawrence13" <lawrence13(a)sky.com> wrote in message >news:0be492b3-4200-4060-8278-1b8b49938dcd(a)w30g2000yqw.googlegroups.com... >> On Aug 9, 12:31 am, Google Beta User <wanyik...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> probably 13-18m pound range. >>> >>> http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/aug/08/manchester-united-mesu... >> >> Come on, why would according to Red Devil, Fergie spend all that money >> and a poor mans Darren Fletcher. > >The academy isn't producing what it once did!!! It's producing far more and better players than Arsenal's academy RED DEVIL |