Nobody mocking Arsenal tonight?
in [Manchester United]
|
From: Lescor on 13 Feb 2010 03:46 "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hmhdn.84156$_p.16584(a)newsfe04.ams2... > > "Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:fd7ab893-dd64-4083-bf70-3c01fbf914e9(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... > On Feb 12, 8:33 am, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >I get it. >> >> > Football fans should be "neutral" like Lescor. >> >> Pope's more neutral than Les. >> >> HTH > > I know, hence the quotes. > > > Ah, sorry, missed that. Strange how difficult it is for you to imagine such a thing. Stranger still, how much you seem to hate the concept. Life is easier when you can attribute club bias to a comment., leap into a defensive pose and another tiresome " my dad can beat your dad" thread is born, and you feel at home. More difficult if you have to consider the opinion as impartial -just a football opinion- and you are left with no, "my team are better than yours" to fall back on. Without that, what else is there? Nothing, so let's ignore the opinion and dream up some "anti my club" hidden motives. God forbid that you would ever reply in the same objective terms as the original opinion. I suspect that your deeply rooted bias now makes this impossible, which is a pity. So, I am regularly accused by somebody of being both pro and anti all the teams I comment about.................or hadn't you noticed? LC
From: Baldoni on 13 Feb 2010 07:13 on 13/02/2010, Lescor supposed : > > "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:hmhdn.84156$_p.16584(a)newsfe04.ams2... >> >> "Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:fd7ab893-dd64-4083-bf70-3c01fbf914e9(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> On Feb 12, 8:33 am, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >I get it. >>> >>> > Football fans should be "neutral" like Lescor. >>> >>> Pope's more neutral than Les. >>> >>> HTH >> >> I know, hence the quotes. >> >> >> Ah, sorry, missed that. > > > Strange how difficult it is for you to imagine such a thing. > Stranger still, how much you seem to hate the concept. > > Life is easier when you can attribute club bias to a comment., > leap into a defensive pose and another tiresome " my dad can > beat your dad" thread is born, and you feel at home. > > More difficult if you have to consider the opinion as impartial > -just a football opinion- and you are left with no, "my team are > better than yours" to fall back on. Without that, what else is there? > Nothing, so let's ignore the opinion and dream up some "anti my > club" hidden motives. God forbid that you would ever reply in the > same objective terms as the original opinion. I suspect that your > deeply rooted bias now makes this impossible, which is a pity. > > So, I am regularly accused by somebody of being both pro and anti > all the teams I comment about.................or hadn't you noticed? > > LC You will not educate this simpleton Les. He can not grasp the concept of objectivity and I put this down to poor education. -- Count Baldoni In hoc signo vinces
From: Red Rackham on 13 Feb 2010 08:54 "Lescor" <lescor(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message news:iJSdnT1pdOty--vWnZ2dnUVZ7sGdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > > > "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:hmhdn.84156$_p.16584(a)newsfe04.ams2... >> >> "Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:fd7ab893-dd64-4083-bf70-3c01fbf914e9(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >> On Feb 12, 8:33 am, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >I get it. >>> >>> > Football fans should be "neutral" like Lescor. >>> >>> Pope's more neutral than Les. >>> >>> HTH >> >> I know, hence the quotes. >> >> >> Ah, sorry, missed that. > > > Strange how difficult it is for you to imagine such a thing. > Stranger still, how much you seem to hate the concept. > > Life is easier when you can attribute club bias to a comment., > leap into a defensive pose and another tiresome " my dad can > beat your dad" thread is born, and you feel at home. > > More difficult if you have to consider the opinion as impartial > -just a football opinion- and you are left with no, "my team are > better than yours" to fall back on. Without that, what else is there? > Nothing, so let's ignore the opinion and dream up some "anti my > club" hidden motives. God forbid that you would ever reply in the > same objective terms as the original opinion. I suspect that your > deeply rooted bias now makes this impossible, which is a pity. > > So, I am regularly accused by somebody of being both pro and anti > all the teams I comment about.................or hadn't you noticed? > > LC > Les, old fruit, you do like to rewrite history, don't you mate. I love impartiality, disinterest and objectivity, what I'm not so keen on is charlatans claiming they posess the above to try and add weight to their opinions when they quite clearly do not. Here's some highlights from your posts, Les: - The Busby Babes weren't as good as people like to think, they had potential, nothing more. (This despite them already having won the league) - United wouldn't have had their success if they'd come from Exeter. - Chelsea's money is just as deserved as United's. - United were lucky to win the league last season due to Chelsea's injuries. (When I point out the United's injuries were more extensive than Chelsea's you evade the point like the plague again) And your denial that the overwhelming majority of fans in a stadium will be partial is an amusing indication of how far you will try and go before admitting you're wrong. > >lescor" > But you didn't old mate. You produced three, who.you said had major > success, obviously comparable with the type of MU Arsenal type sustained > succes we were talking about, and you.....wait for it, named > Huddersfield??? Ipswich? and Blackpool all of which had success although > with less populations than my example, which could have been chosen from > scores but happened to be Exeter. So, according to you, this proves that > as Exeter has a bigger population than all your named 3 it proves that my > argument is wrong. lol........Do you have any idea of what a non sequitur > is? Les, Les, Les. You said a big population base was a 'requirement' of success. I clearly pointed out, with examples, that this isn't necessarily the case. You really are going to have to get better at dealing with adversity. And let's not forget that this all stemmed from your pathological inability to acknowledge United's success without some bizarre rider such as they wouldn't have had it if they'd come from Exeter. > > It would prove no such thing, but put your mind to this. Exeter.in fact, > has a lower population to the three you named......lol.....unfortunate but > true old chump. Sadly for you Les, not true at all. Latest official figures has Exeter's population as being over 3000 larger than Ipswich's. But I know how hard you find it to ever admit you're wrong so let's gloss over this. Let's just recognise just what kind of 'impartial' mind would gain comfort from the idea that United would never have been successful if they'd come from Exeter. Till the next time, Les. Adieu.
From: REDDEVIL6 on 13 Feb 2010 12:01 On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:13:57 GMT, Baldoni <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >on 13/02/2010, Lescor supposed : >> >> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:hmhdn.84156$_p.16584(a)newsfe04.ams2... >>> >>> "Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:fd7ab893-dd64-4083-bf70-3c01fbf914e9(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>> On Feb 12, 8:33 am, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >I get it. >>>> >>>> > Football fans should be "neutral" like Lescor. >>>> >>>> Pope's more neutral than Les. >>>> >>>> HTH >>> >>> I know, hence the quotes. >>> >>> >>> Ah, sorry, missed that. >> >> >> Strange how difficult it is for you to imagine such a thing. >> Stranger still, how much you seem to hate the concept. >> >> Life is easier when you can attribute club bias to a comment., >> leap into a defensive pose and another tiresome " my dad can >> beat your dad" thread is born, and you feel at home. >> >> More difficult if you have to consider the opinion as impartial >> -just a football opinion- and you are left with no, "my team are >> better than yours" to fall back on. Without that, what else is there? >> Nothing, so let's ignore the opinion and dream up some "anti my >> club" hidden motives. God forbid that you would ever reply in the >> same objective terms as the original opinion. I suspect that your >> deeply rooted bias now makes this impossible, which is a pity. >> >> So, I am regularly accused by somebody of being both pro and anti >> all the teams I comment about.................or hadn't you noticed? >> >> LC > >You will not educate this simpleton Les. He can not grasp the concept >of objectivity and I put this down to poor education. Your one to talk about education! Look where yours got you, in the back of a greasy burger van!
From: Pakistan Meteorological Department on 13 Feb 2010 13:30
REDDEVIL6(a)nospam.net wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:13:57 GMT, Baldoni <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> > wrote: > > >>on 13/02/2010, Lescor supposed : >> >>>"Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:hmhdn.84156$_p.16584(a)newsfe04.ams2... >>> >>>>"Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>>>news:fd7ab893-dd64-4083-bf70-3c01fbf914e9(a)k41g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... >>>>On Feb 12, 8:33 am, "Red Rackham" <ONei...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>I get it. >>>>> >>>>>>Football fans should be "neutral" like Lescor. >>>>> >>>>>Pope's more neutral than Les. >>>>> >>>>>HTH >>>> >>>>I know, hence the quotes. >>>> >>>> >>>>Ah, sorry, missed that. >>> >>> >>>Strange how difficult it is for you to imagine such a thing. >>>Stranger still, how much you seem to hate the concept. >>> >>>Life is easier when you can attribute club bias to a comment., >>>leap into a defensive pose and another tiresome " my dad can >>>beat your dad" thread is born, and you feel at home. >>> >>>More difficult if you have to consider the opinion as impartial >>> -just a football opinion- and you are left with no, "my team are >>>better than yours" to fall back on. Without that, what else is there? >>>Nothing, so let's ignore the opinion and dream up some "anti my >>>club" hidden motives. God forbid that you would ever reply in the >>>same objective terms as the original opinion. I suspect that your >>>deeply rooted bias now makes this impossible, which is a pity. >>> >>>So, I am regularly accused by somebody of being both pro and anti >>>all the teams I comment about.................or hadn't you noticed? >>> >>>LC >> >>You will not educate this simpleton Les. He can not grasp the concept >>of objectivity and I put this down to poor education. > > > Your one to talk about education! Look where yours got you, in the > back of a greasy burger van! It's "You are" or "You're" you thick stupid dumbass! -- "Entire units of the Metropolitan Police and the Flying Squad and the drug squad were Freemasons. They all, in the end, were sent to prison. When you are bonded by an oath of mutual defence and loyalty, you may well find that it is extremely difficult to squeal on your corrupt brethren" Martin Short on BBC Newsnight 19/03/01 |