Berbatov
in [World Football]
|
From: REDDEVIL6 on 2 May 2010 14:03 On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT), Graf Finklestein <udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On 2 May, 18:54, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista >> >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >On May 2, 11:55�am, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista >> >> >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here. >> >> >> So bitter! >> >> >Do you consider him to be a successful buy at �31 million, also taking >> >into consideration that Tevez was let go to accomodate him? Please be >> >honest. >> >> He's a better player than Tevez, no doubt! > >? > >Probably one of the more bizarre declarations I've heard in a long, >long time. > >I wonder if you would have still made such a claim if Berbatov had >been the player sold last summer and Tevez had instead stayed at OT? We'd hardly keep a player that only scored 5 times for us and sell a player that scores at least twice his rate would we?
From: Graf Finklestein on 2 May 2010 14:10 On 2 May, 19:03, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT), Graf Finklestein > > > > <udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >On 2 May, 18:54, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista > > >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >On May 2, 11:55 am, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista > > >> >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here. > > >> >> So bitter! > > >> >Do you consider him to be a successful buy at £31 million, also taking > >> >into consideration that Tevez was let go to accomodate him? Please be > >> >honest. > > >> He's a better player than Tevez, no doubt! > > >? > > >Probably one of the more bizarre declarations I've heard in a long, > >long time. > > >I wonder if you would have still made such a claim if Berbatov had > >been the player sold last summer and Tevez had instead stayed at OT? > > We'd hardly keep a player that only scored 5 times for us and sell a > player that scores at least twice his rate would we? Stats show that Berbatow has, to date, scored 26 goals in 85 games for you, an average of 0.3 goals a game. Tevez scored 34 in 99 games for you, which is an even better average of 0.34 goals per game. Tevez has since gone on to score 29 goals in 40 games for Man City this season. Sure you don't want to revise your opinion?
From: REDDEVIL6 on 2 May 2010 14:19 On Sun, 2 May 2010 11:10:30 -0700 (PDT), Graf Finklestein <udo_binsack(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On 2 May, 19:03, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT), Graf Finklestein >> >> >> >> <udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >On 2 May, 18:54, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista >> >> >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >On May 2, 11:55�am, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista >> >> >> >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here. >> >> >> >> So bitter! >> >> >> >Do you consider him to be a successful buy at �31 million, also taking >> >> >into consideration that Tevez was let go to accomodate him? Please be >> >> >honest. >> >> >> He's a better player than Tevez, no doubt! >> >> >? >> >> >Probably one of the more bizarre declarations I've heard in a long, >> >long time. >> >> >I wonder if you would have still made such a claim if Berbatov had >> >been the player sold last summer and Tevez had instead stayed at OT? >> >> We'd hardly keep a player that only scored 5 times for us and sell a >> player that scores at least twice his rate would we? � > >Stats show that Berbatow has, to date, scored 26 goals in 85 games for >you, an average of 0.3 goals a game. Tevez scored 34 in 99 games for >you, which is an even better average of 0.34 goals per game. > >Tevez has since gone on to score 29 goals in 40 games for Man City >this season. > >Sure you don't want to revise your opinion? Absolutely not How many of those were league goals? He'll be off from Man City soon, it's all about money and nothing else for him.
From: Alkamista on 2 May 2010 14:24 On May 2, 1:54 pm, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista > > <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >On May 2, 11:55 am, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista > > >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here. > > >> So bitter! > > >Do you consider him to be a successful buy at £31 million, also taking > >into consideration that Tevez was let go to accomodate him? Please be > >honest. > > He's a better player than Tevez, no doubt! You didnt answer the question. Do you consider him a successful buy at £31 million?
From: Graf Finklestein on 2 May 2010 14:34 On 2 May, 19:19, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > On Sun, 2 May 2010 11:10:30 -0700 (PDT), Graf Finklestein > > > > <udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >On 2 May, 19:03, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:57:54 -0700 (PDT), Graf Finklestein > > >> <udo_bins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >On 2 May, 18:54, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista > > >> >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On May 2, 11:55 am, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote: > >> >> >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista > > >> >> >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here. > > >> >> >> So bitter! > > >> >> >Do you consider him to be a successful buy at £31 million, also taking > >> >> >into consideration that Tevez was let go to accomodate him? Please be > >> >> >honest. > > >> >> He's a better player than Tevez, no doubt! > > >> >? > > >> >Probably one of the more bizarre declarations I've heard in a long, > >> >long time. > > >> >I wonder if you would have still made such a claim if Berbatov had > >> >been the player sold last summer and Tevez had instead stayed at OT? > > >> We'd hardly keep a player that only scored 5 times for us and sell a > >> player that scores at least twice his rate would we? > > >Stats show that Berbatow has, to date, scored 26 goals in 85 games for > >you, an average of 0.3 goals a game. Tevez scored 34 in 99 games for > >you, which is an even better average of 0.34 goals per game. > > >Tevez has since gone on to score 29 goals in 40 games for Man City > >this season. > > >Sure you don't want to revise your opinion? > > Absolutely not > > How many of those were league goals? Why do only league goals matter? Why do goals scored in Europe, FA Cup and League Cup not count? But regardless, Berbatov has 21 in 65 league games, Tevez scored 19 in 63. Almost identical. > He'll be off from Man City soon, it's all about money and nothing > else for him. What has that got to do with your claim? You stated that Berbatov was 'undoubtedly' a better player than Tevez , based on the former having scored substanitally more goals. I've shown not only was this not the case at all, but Tevez actually had the better goal return for you. Care to revise your statement yet?
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: EPL: Liverpool - Chelsea [R] Next: Looks like Maradona, plays like Maradona, not Maradona |