From: Alkamista on
What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here.
From: REDDEVIL6 on
On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista
<alkamista(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here.


So bitter!
From: Alkamista on
On May 2, 11:55 am, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista
>
> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here.
>
> So bitter!

Do you consider him to be a successful buy at £31 million, also taking
into consideration that Tevez was let go to accomodate him? Please be
honest.
From: REDDEVIL6 on
On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista
<alkamista(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>On May 2, 11:55�am, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista
>>
>> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here.
>>
>> So bitter!
>
>Do you consider him to be a successful buy at �31 million, also taking
>into consideration that Tevez was let go to accomodate him? Please be
>honest.

He's a better player than Tevez, no doubt!
From: Graf Finklestein on
On 2 May, 18:54, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2010 10:46:05 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista
>
> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On May 2, 11:55 am, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2 May 2010 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT), Alkamista
>
> >> <alkami...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >What a waste of money. We are talking Robbie Keane levels here.
>
> >> So bitter!
>
> >Do you consider him to be a successful buy at £31 million, also taking
> >into consideration that Tevez was let go to accomodate him? Please be
> >honest.
>
> He's a better player than Tevez, no doubt!

?

Probably one of the more bizarre declarations I've heard in a long,
long time.

I wonder if you would have still made such a claim if Berbatov had
been the player sold last summer and Tevez had instead stayed at OT?