From: Mentalguy2k8 on 5 May 2010 13:06 "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:84de29F5rkU1(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:5183eb83-028f-4918-9b09-40261e0dd1e3(a)q30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >> Or why is there the perception that they're "illegitimate" and "don't >> have history" but players are apparently fine being linked to Chelsea >> or Chelsea are treated as a proper elite club within the football >> media? I say this due to this Buffon quote: >> >> "The best players in the world want to be playing for the top teams in >> the top three leagues, and that's no more than five or six teams. It's >> a very elite list and Manchester City have to accept the fact they are >> not one of them." >> >> But Chelsea is? >> >> Disclaimer: I don't begrudge either club for their riches. I just >> find the different treatement of the true clubs odd. > > It was the same with Chelsea. > > What amazes me with City fans though is the sheer level of arrogance that > has consumed them, if they do manage to buy success I dread to think what > they'll be like. All these years of pent up bitterness has seriously bent > their heads. Just like United fans, and probably Chelsea fans after next Sunday!
From: Mentalguy2k8 on 5 May 2010 13:06 "W.Wots" <Wots(a)Wotsplace.co.uk> wrote in message news:k3hEn.54627$DV5.5305(a)newsfe07.ams2... > > "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message > news:84dhc6Fq8gU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> Google Beta User laid this down on his screen : >>> Or why is there the perception that they're "illegitimate" and "don't >>> have history" but players are apparently fine being linked to Chelsea >>> or Chelsea are treated as a proper elite club within the football >>> media? I say this due to this Buffon quote: >>> >>> "The best players in the world want to be playing for the top teams in >>> the top three leagues, and that's no more than five or six teams. It's >>> a very elite list and Manchester City have to accept the fact they are >>> not one of them." >>> >>> But Chelsea is? >>> >>> Disclaimer: I don't begrudge either club for their riches. I just >>> find the different treatement of the true clubs odd. >> >> City and Chelsea are not run as clubs are supposed to be run. IMHO is >> should be part of the rules that clubs only operate on the condition that >> they operate based on the amounts of revenue that they generate >> themselves. > > Isn't that what Platini is about to impose on the football clubs of > Europe, I can't wait to see how Real Madrid skirt around that one. He won't impose it on them, they're not English.
From: Diablos Rojos on 6 May 2010 03:38 "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:8AhEn.34545$G27.22416(a)newsfe30.ams2... > > "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:84de29F5rkU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> >> "Google Beta User" <wanyikuli(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:5183eb83-028f-4918-9b09-40261e0dd1e3(a)q30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >>> Or why is there the perception that they're "illegitimate" and "don't >>> have history" but players are apparently fine being linked to Chelsea >>> or Chelsea are treated as a proper elite club within the football >>> media? I say this due to this Buffon quote: >>> >>> "The best players in the world want to be playing for the top teams in >>> the top three leagues, and that's no more than five or six teams. It's >>> a very elite list and Manchester City have to accept the fact they are >>> not one of them." >>> >>> But Chelsea is? >>> >>> Disclaimer: I don't begrudge either club for their riches. I just >>> find the different treatement of the true clubs odd. >> >> It was the same with Chelsea. >> >> What amazes me with City fans though is the sheer level of arrogance that >> has consumed them, if they do manage to buy success I dread to think what >> they'll be like. All these years of pent up bitterness has seriously >> bent their heads. > > Just like United fans, and probably Chelsea fans after next Sunday! Not at all their arrogance is born of the fact that they are owned by a mega wealthy sheik and they think they are now owed something, you ain't surrounded by the clowns I am and you wouldn't believe the shite they spout..... Mancini has took them as far as he can time to get Maureen in.... FFS.
From: Jussi Uosukainen on 9 May 2010 18:16 In uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool Mentalguy2k8 <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > "W.Wots" <Wots(a)Wotsplace.co.uk> wrote in message > news:k3hEn.54627$DV5.5305(a)newsfe07.ams2... >> >> "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message >> news:84dhc6Fq8gU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>> Google Beta User laid this down on his screen : >>>> Or why is there the perception that they're "illegitimate" and "don't >>>> have history" but players are apparently fine being linked to Chelsea >>>> or Chelsea are treated as a proper elite club within the football >>>> media? I say this due to this Buffon quote: >>>> >>>> "The best players in the world want to be playing for the top teams in >>>> the top three leagues, and that's no more than five or six teams. It's >>>> a very elite list and Manchester City have to accept the fact they are >>>> not one of them." >>>> >>>> But Chelsea is? >>>> >>>> Disclaimer: I don't begrudge either club for their riches. I just >>>> find the different treatement of the true clubs odd. >>> >>> City and Chelsea are not run as clubs are supposed to be run. IMHO is >>> should be part of the rules that clubs only operate on the condition that >>> they operate based on the amounts of revenue that they generate >>> themselves. >> >> Isn't that what Platini is about to impose on the football clubs of >> Europe, I can't wait to see how Real Madrid skirt around that one. > > He won't impose it on them, they're not English. > Also, what Platini is going to impose will do nothing to Citeh of Chelski. Their debt is to the owner, they can easily write it off / mask it. The uefa sanctions will be against clubs with unhealthy amounts of debt, so Liverpool and the Scum will be the first to suffer, along with Valencia. And RM will just have the city of Madrid pay off their debts (though with the Spanish housing market being what it is, that might be more problematic). -- /jussi If you never tell a lie to her, You don't have to remember anything. * The Streets
From: Chuck Spears on 10 May 2010 10:43 "Jussi Uosukainen" <juso(a)iki.fi> wrote in message news:4be73444$0$2542$7b1e8fa0(a)news.nbl.fi... > In uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool Mentalguy2k8 <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> "W.Wots" <Wots(a)Wotsplace.co.uk> wrote in message >> news:k3hEn.54627$DV5.5305(a)newsfe07.ams2... >>> >>> "Baldoni" <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:84dhc6Fq8gU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>> Google Beta User laid this down on his screen : >>>>> Or why is there the perception that they're "illegitimate" and "don't >>>>> have history" but players are apparently fine being linked to Chelsea >>>>> or Chelsea are treated as a proper elite club within the football >>>>> media? I say this due to this Buffon quote: >>>>> >>>>> "The best players in the world want to be playing for the top teams in >>>>> the top three leagues, and that's no more than five or six teams. It's >>>>> a very elite list and Manchester City have to accept the fact they are >>>>> not one of them." >>>>> >>>>> But Chelsea is? >>>>> >>>>> Disclaimer: I don't begrudge either club for their riches. I just >>>>> find the different treatement of the true clubs odd. >>>> >>>> City and Chelsea are not run as clubs are supposed to be run. IMHO is >>>> should be part of the rules that clubs only operate on the condition >>>> that >>>> they operate based on the amounts of revenue that they generate >>>> themselves. >>> >>> Isn't that what Platini is about to impose on the football clubs of >>> Europe, I can't wait to see how Real Madrid skirt around that one. >> >> He won't impose it on them, they're not English. >> > > Also, what Platini is going to impose will do nothing to Citeh of > Chelski. Their debt is to the owner, they can easily write it off / mask > it. The uefa sanctions will be against clubs with unhealthy amounts of > debt, so Liverpool and the Scum will be the first to suffer, along with > Valencia. > > And RM will just have the city of Madrid pay off their debts (though > with the Spanish housing market being what it is, that might be more > problematic). > -- > /jussi > If you never tell a lie to her, > You don't have to remember anything. > * The Streets You are totally clueless with regard to what Platini has suggested.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Borrell shocked by state of Academy Next: Liverpool politics is like religion |