From: The Ghost Of Edward M. Kennedy on
"unclejr" <watsona(a)kenyon.edu> wrote

> If the US draws 0-0 and England draws 2-2, the advancing team
> will be the winner of a RANDOM draw.
>
> The athleticism involved in a random draw is simply AM-ZING!
> The good news is that the odds of England scoring twice is
> near absolute zero.
<
<I thought that this was going to be a post about diving.

There's more diving in soccer than any other sport.

--Tedward


From: The Ghost Of Edward M. Kennedy on
"xyzzy" <xyzzy.dude(a)gmail.com> wrote

> If the US draws 0-0 and England draws 2-2, the advancing team
> will be the winner of a RANDOM draw.
>
> The athleticism involved in a random draw is simply AM-ZING!
> The good news is that the odds of England scoring twice is
> near absolute zero.
<
<No less random than a shoot-out (IMO)

Like free throws in basketball, shoutouts at least involve not choking.
See Memphis, Calipari.

--Tedward


From: xyzzy on
On Jun 21, 11:25 am, "The Ghost Of Edward M. Kennedy" <e...(a)o.com>
wrote:
> "stephenj" <sjar...(a)cox.net> wrote
>
> >> If the US draws 0-0 and England draws 2-2, the advancing team
> >> will be the winner of a RANDOM draw.
>
> > to be fair, in our football, playoff tiebreakers (and we're basically
> > talking about making the playoffs here) can boil down to a coin flip as
> > well.
>
> > it's just that it is more likely here in the WC, because a 3-game schedule
> > creates fewer opportunities than a 16-game scchedule for statistical
> > distinctions (e.g., record within division, conference, etc.) before it
> > boils down to that.
>
> Well then maybe the problem is the dumbass 3-game schedule.
> Maybe even amature college baseball has an answer.
>
> --Tedward

No draws?
From: nigel on
unclejr wrote:

> On Jun 21, 9:39 am, "The Ghost Of Edward M. Kennedy" <e...(a)o.com>
> wrote:
>
>>If the US draws 0-0 and England draws 2-2, the advancing team
>>will be the winner of a RANDOM draw.
>>
>>The athleticism involved in a random draw is simply AM-ZING!
>>The good news is that the odds of England scoring twice is
>>near absolute zero.
>
>
> I thought that this was going to be a post about diving.
>
> -Junior

I thought this was going to be a post about 'Torchwood'.

From: Adam HS on
The Ghost Of Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
> "unclejr" <watsona(a)kenyon.edu> wrote
>
>> If the US draws 0-0 and England draws 2-2, the advancing team
>> will be the winner of a RANDOM draw.
>>
>> The athleticism involved in a random draw is simply AM-ZING!
>> The good news is that the odds of England scoring twice is
>> near absolute zero.
> <
> <I thought that this was going to be a post about diving.
>
> There's more diving in soccer than any other sport.
>

Really? More than in diving?