Baby twins 'mauled' by fox linked to Freemasons.
in [Liverpool]
|
Prev: Rafa
Next: Respect to Mr R Benites
From: Baldoni on 8 Jun 2010 18:29 It happens that Aaron formulated : > I have known many Catholics, worked with a few Catholic > priests, and even given sermons in Catholic churches, We call it the "homily" old boy and not the sermon. -- Count Baldoni
From: Baldoni on 8 Jun 2010 18:36 Aaron explained : > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:42:33 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian > <great_sage_equal_of_heaven_(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On 8 June, 12:38, Aaron <a...(a)home.net> wrote: >>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:16:09 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian >>> >>> >>> >>> <great_sage_equal_of_heav...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>> The mother of nine-month-old twin girls has described her "living >>>> nightmare" after her daughters were apparently mauled by a fox as they >>>> slept in their cots in east London. >>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/10251349.stm >>>> Fox hunting tankard.By Prince William.Masonic interest. >>>> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Fox-hunting-tankard-Prince-William-Masonic-inte... >>>> Ceramic tankard by Prince William ware. >>>> Horses and hounds decoration on one side. >>>> On the facing side is the masonic �wording: >>>> Lodge of Merit >>>> No.934 >>>> Bro S Brown W.M. >>>> Old English Night >>>> 19 Sept.1960 >>>> On the base is .....Prince William � Warranted 22 carat gold >>> >>> So there is actually no link between the fox attack and Masonry, >>> Masons, or any particular Mason or Masons at all. >> >> I remember when you said "So there is actually no link between me and >> Masonry, Masons, or any particular Mason or Masons at all." >> What a whopping lie that was GM Aapron. > > You are lying. That is not a quote; it is just something that you > wish I had said. > > Before you began your silly posts (unless you were posting under > another name), I said, quite truly, that I was not a Mason and had > never been a Mason, and that I was researching the organization. I > made when I first read and posted to this NG in 2003; I joined Masonry > in 2009. To be candid, you kooks were very helpful in my research: > your post were full of lies but they gave me clues where to find out > the actual facts. Of course you are just trying to change the topic > now that your complete foolishness is exposed. > > Back to the topic: link to an Ebay auction of a tankard depicting a > man hunting something with dogs (no fox is dipicted on the tankard) > does not link Masonry to the animal attack. I find it difficult to > believe that anyone could be stupid enough to think that this is some > sort of "link." Huntsmen/women do not hunt with "dogs" old man they hunt with "hounds", it is imperative for your own standing that you get this correct. Anyone who has made a fool of themselves at a dinner party discussing hunting will know exactly what I am talking about immediately. -- Count Baldoni
From: Baldoni on 8 Jun 2010 18:38 weskremove(a)prodigy.net wrote : > Congratulations on being raised Brother Aaron... welcome! I too joined in > the fall of 2008, and must say that Masonry truly is one of the joys of my > life. And I NEVER cease to be amazed at the idiotic nut jobs that choose to > make our fraternity a target of their foolishness. > > Wes > S.S. > Master Mason > Twinsburg, OH You do the decent thing and stay as far away as possible from the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church and its members. -- Count Baldoni
From: Aaron on 8 Jun 2010 18:38 On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:29:14 +0100, Baldoni <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >It happens that Aaron formulated : > > >> I have known many Catholics, worked with a few Catholic >> priests, and even given sermons in Catholic churches, > >We call it the "homily" old boy and not the sermon. Well, as a guest speaker, I called it the sermon. LOL
From: Aaron on 8 Jun 2010 19:39
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:36:12 +0100, Baldoni <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >Aaron explained : >> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 10:42:33 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian >> <great_sage_equal_of_heaven_(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 8 June, 12:38, Aaron <a...(a)home.net> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 15:16:09 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <great_sage_equal_of_heav...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>> The mother of nine-month-old twin girls has described her "living >>>>> nightmare" after her daughters were apparently mauled by a fox as they >>>>> slept in their cots in east London. >>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/10251349.stm >>>>> Fox hunting tankard.By Prince William.Masonic interest. >>>>> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Fox-hunting-tankard-Prince-William-Masonic-inte... >>>>> Ceramic tankard by Prince William ware. >>>>> Horses and hounds decoration on one side. >>>>> On the facing side is the masonic wording: >>>>> Lodge of Merit >>>>> No.934 >>>>> Bro S Brown W.M. >>>>> Old English Night >>>>> 19 Sept.1960 >>>>> On the base is .....Prince William Warranted 22 carat gold >>>> >>>> So there is actually no link between the fox attack and Masonry, >>>> Masons, or any particular Mason or Masons at all. >>> >>> I remember when you said "So there is actually no link between me and >>> Masonry, Masons, or any particular Mason or Masons at all." >>> What a whopping lie that was GM Aapron. >> >> You are lying. That is not a quote; it is just something that you >> wish I had said. >> >> Before you began your silly posts (unless you were posting under >> another name), I said, quite truly, that I was not a Mason and had >> never been a Mason, and that I was researching the organization. I >> made when I first read and posted to this NG in 2003; I joined Masonry >> in 2009. To be candid, you kooks were very helpful in my research: >> your post were full of lies but they gave me clues where to find out >> the actual facts. Of course you are just trying to change the topic >> now that your complete foolishness is exposed. >> >> Back to the topic: link to an Ebay auction of a tankard depicting a >> man hunting something with dogs (no fox is dipicted on the tankard) >> does not link Masonry to the animal attack. I find it difficult to >> believe that anyone could be stupid enough to think that this is some >> sort of "link." > >Huntsmen/women do not hunt with "dogs" old man they hunt with "hounds", >it is imperative for your own standing that you get this correct. Maybe you just don't know very much about dogs... A "hound" is a type of dog. All hounds are dogs, but not all dogs are hounds. Other types of dogs are also used in hunting. >Anyone who has made a fool of themselves at a dinner party discussing >hunting will know exactly what I am talking about immediately. So, just you them. |