From: stan lee on
he has moved to Chelsea for an undisclosed fee, rats on a ship now, who is
next


From: Vidar Olavesen on
"stan lee" <Willy(a)matthehonk.com> skrev i melding
news:896p6iF6sgU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> he has moved to Chelsea for an undisclosed fee, rats on a ship now, who is
> next

On the norwegian page, it says 6 mill. Hate to see him gone, he was a player
doing unexpected and creative things. Good luck to Yossi, but hope he do bad
when Chelsea play Liverpool.


From: stan lee on
his fault was that he never cover or went back to cover the left back, he
was lazy in that aspect. The game has changed no as in when you are on the
wing you have to run the whole of the line and he never did, but who did?
"Vidar Olavesen" <olavese(a)online.no> wrote in message
news:Z7OdnYMmKtSyeLPRnZ2dnUVZ87-dnZ2d(a)telenor.com...
> "stan lee" <Willy(a)matthehonk.com> skrev i melding
> news:896p6iF6sgU1(a)mid.individual.net...
>> he has moved to Chelsea for an undisclosed fee, rats on a ship now, who
>> is next
>
> On the norwegian page, it says 6 mill. Hate to see him gone, he was a
> player doing unexpected and creative things. Good luck to Yossi, but hope
> he do bad when Chelsea play Liverpool.
>
>


From: CJM on


"stan lee" <Willy(a)matthehonk.com> wrote in message
news:896p6iF6sgU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> he has moved to Chelsea for an undisclosed fee, rats on a ship now, who is
> next

I'm disappointed that he's gone. Both because he was a valuable player (one
in the team who can often unlock stubborn defences), he was a hard worker,
but also because I though he would given Hodgson a chance.

On the other hand, from what I heard, the club couldn't wait to usher him
out of the door. Valuable player though he was, he was getting on a bit
(thus was only going to lose value) and the �6m or so they received was need
to put towards paying off Rafa and buying Hodgson out of his contract.
Apparently, Hodgson won't be seeing a penny of they funds - despite what
other spending assurances we are led to believe he has been given.

From: Google Beta User on
On Jul 5, 6:47 am, "CJM" <cjmuk2...(a)gmail.removethis.com> wrote:

> I'm disappointed that he's gone. Both because he was a valuable player (one
> in the team who can often unlock stubborn defences), he was a hard worker,
> but also because I though he would given Hodgson a chance.

Assuming Maxi sticks around it's a straight swap. Perhaps Pacheco
might come off the bench occasionally, and Maxi's an actual wide
player.