From: Bob on 5 Jul 2010 10:27
Real Mardin wrote:
> On Jul 5, 3:16 am, b...(a)ipp-garching.mpg.de (Bruce D. Scott) wrote:
>> Uruguay deserve their place in the last four.
> Brilliant post, Mr Scott, very astute observations.
> Posts like this are what rss is about.
Yeah right. Did you actually bother checking the video? Come on I expect
better from you.
From: Viking on 5 Jul 2010 10:26
Disculpa Senora Ll�o, pero did you really mime the following on
7/5/2010 1:44 AM???
> "Viking"<victor.king1(a)verizon.net> escreveu na mensagem
>> Disculpa Senora Bruce D. Scott, pero did you really mime the following on
>> 7/4/2010 10:16 PM???
>>> Uruguay deserve their place in the last four.
> Agreed. Although I don't think it's likely, I'm rooting for them to go all
> the way.
>> I actually have much simpler reasons to root for Uruguay.
>> Back in 2005, I spent a month in Montevideo and fell in love with Uruguay;
>> especially, since I got to watch a game at the staduim where they had THE
>> original WC. It was a qual. game for the 2006 WC and the home team beat
>> Paraguay 1-0. For a soccer fan from the USofA, it was an awesome
>> experience. BTW - for the Uruguay fans on board, what's the deal with the
>> "Lo Cerrete" (sp?) cheer?
> I think you mean this:
> "Celeste" = sky blue, it's the nickname of the Uruguayan national team.
That clears up something that has been bugging me for years now - so
it's "Soy Celeste." This group is awesome!
From: Bruce D. Scott on 5 Jul 2010 11:31
Real Mardin (real_mardin(a)yahoo.co.uk) wrote:
: On Jul 5, 3:16=A0am, b...(a)ipp-garching.mpg.de (Bruce D. Scott) wrote:
: > Uruguay deserve their place in the last four.
: Brilliant post, Mr Scott, very astute observations.
: Posts like this are what rss is about.
drift wave turbulence: http://www.rzg.mpg.de/~bds/
From: HASM on 5 Jul 2010 15:52
"Bob" <Bob(a)Bob.com> writes:
> I'd definitely give you a straight red card for unsporting behavior.
How many times do you have to be told that "unsporting behavior" results in
a caution and yellow card? Even if you give out two cautions for UB,
resulting in an ejection, the ejection reason is receiving a second caution,
not either of the UBs.
"Straight red cards" (your term) can only be given for the seven offences
listed on Law 12, Fouls and Misconducts (page 35 of the 2010/2011 English
Not that complicated,
From: Alkamista on 5 Jul 2010 15:58
On Jul 5, 10:26 am, "Bob" <B...(a)Bob.com> wrote:
> Bruce D. Scott wrote:
> > I just saw the repeat broadcast of the match Uruguay vs Ghana.
> > In that critical half-minute at the end, one of the worst dives of the
> > whole tournament, worse than the one Holland got a yellow card for,
> > set up the free kick at about 119'30 So it went in and you all know
> The broadcast didn't show a replay or a close up of the foul that led to the
> free-kick. In other words, you are basing your opinion on worthless footage,
I haven't seen this particular incident so I dont have an opinion on
it, but I'd like to know exactly what criteria renders any given
footage as "worthless."