From: The Scrutineer on 14 May 2010 03:12 > > No I don't like it because I don't like Camorenesi playing for Italy. > I believe international football is representative football, when a NT > is picked what is being communicated is that these players are the > best that this country or football association has been able to > produce, not this is mostly the best we are able to produce plus one > or two from that big country in south america (or where ever else). > > If the Maltese guy grew up in Italy and became a professional there, > he represents Italian football, not Maltese football. If he isn't good > enough to make it to the NT it's bad luck indeed. And it would also > stop traitors like Simunic from jumping ship. Though why would you deny him the chance to represent his heritage?
From: The Scrutineer on 14 May 2010 03:15 You both get fired up over little issues, the rule wont change unless Abubakr is next in line for FIFA presidency, that said, it's not necessarily right either, it's a good idea, but grey at best, it is hard to get a clear black and white solution for this subject!!!
From: Karamako on 14 May 2010 03:16 Abubakr wrote: > Regulations need to come in to stop established professionals from > changing nationalities. One way to do this would be to have any player > registering a professional contract nominate his/her nationality and > that nationality stays with the player for life and cannot be changed. > This still allows juniors to choose between countries that they would > like to represent in international football but it stops third rate > (and at time even first and second rate) Brazilians and the odd > Argentine from playing for the likes of Croatia, Portugal, Germany, > Italy etc... They should do as in rugby, a player can play for " the country in which: (a) he was born; or (b) one parent or grandparent was born; or (c) he has completed thirty six consecutive months of Residence immediately preceding the time of playing." and get rid of this question of nationality. A football team doesn't "represent" a nationality.
From: Abubakr on 14 May 2010 03:17 On May 14, 5:07 pm, El Kot <nono.black.e...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Abubakr wrote: > > On May 14, 3:57 pm, El Kot <nono.black.e...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Abubakr wrote: > >>> On May 14, 3:00 pm, El Kot <nono.black.e...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Abubakr wrote: > >>>>> On May 14, 2:02 pm, El Kot <nono.black.e...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>> Abubakr wrote: > >>>>>>> Regulations need to come in to stop established professionals from > >>>>>>> changing nationalities. One way to do this would be to have any player > >>>>>>> registering a professional contract nominate his/her nationality and > >>>>>>> that nationality stays with the player for life and cannot be changed. > >>>>>>> This still allows juniors to choose between countries that they would > >>>>>>> like to represent in international football but it stops third rate > >>>>>>> (and at time even first and second rate) Brazilians and the odd > >>>>>>> Argentine from playing for the likes of Croatia, Portugal, Germany, > >>>>>>> Italy etc... > >>>>>> I totally disagree. You're full of it. Fie! > >>>>> You are entitled to your opinion but at least be man enough to give > >>>>> reasons for your disagreement instead of offering gratuitous and > >>>>> chickenshit ad hominem remarks. > >>>> There's no chickenshit or ad hominem; I'm just disgusted by your > >>>> proposal (not by you personally, but still, as carrier of such > >>>> disgusting ideas...). If you can't see why your proposal is totally > >>>> disgusting and evil, I can't help you. Again, don't take it personally - > >>>> I'm disgusted by your ideas, not by you. > >>> This is an idiotic response and frankly I don't want to know your > >>> reasons now. > >> This proves you're an idiot, in that case. Good riddance. > > > You are the one with idiotic responses, not me. Good riddance indeed. > > Plonk. Another fool with delusions of grandeur.
From: Abubakr on 14 May 2010 03:23
On May 14, 5:16 pm, "Karamako" <monsieur.karam...(a)nawadoo.fr> wrote: > Abubakr wrote: > > Regulations need to come in to stop established professionals from > > changing nationalities. One way to do this would be to have any player > > registering a professional contract nominate his/her nationality and > > that nationality stays with the player for life and cannot be changed. > > This still allows juniors to choose between countries that they would > > like to represent in international football but it stops third rate > > (and at time even first and second rate) Brazilians and the odd > > Argentine from playing for the likes of Croatia, Portugal, Germany, > > Italy etc... > > They should do as in rugby, a player can play for " > the country in which: > > (a) he was born; or > (b) one parent or grandparent was born; or > (c) he has completed thirty six consecutive months of Residence immediately > preceding the time of playing." > > and get rid of this question of nationality. A football team doesn't > "represent" a nationality. Obviously I don't agree. I want it restricted, not liberalised. |