From: ixion martin - GdBx on 18 Mar 2010 19:48 Chagney Hunt a �mis l'id�e suivante : >> I insinuate that with both theorical teams with equal >> levels, it's easier to win when you play in an English team. >> Most of all Manchester and Liverpool. > > Which explains why Liverpool are in th Europa League? :-) They were so so bad. It's all. > Liverpool have benefited from some comical ref's errors, as usual. -- Ixion Contre une �quipe �trang�re, quand on dit diplomatiquement que l'arbitre n'est pas dans un bon soir, c'est toujours le club fran�ais qui morfle. En s�lection, c'est parfois l'inverse. Dans ce cas, on ne nous le pardonne pas.
From: Sven Mischkies on 18 Mar 2010 19:52 Chagney Hunt <essetm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > 2. Kuyt's foul: OK... I don't know what the linesman saw, or didn't > see. It looked to me like a foul, from an angle that was opposite to > the linesman and away from the ball. Is it worth making a new Rashomon > out of it? I wouldn't mind a remake. The last was almost 50 years ago. > 3. Lille were simply overmatched. They looked psyched out, lacking in > experiences for big match to me. No legit goal canceled, no break > called off for wrongful offside, no questionable pen uncalled -- > what's their claim to being robbed? They robbed themselves by not scoring two superb chances. Ciao, SM -- http://www.gourockviews.co.uk I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting. But it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously. Douglas Adams
From: REDDEVIL6 on 18 Mar 2010 19:57 On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:29:53 -0700 (PDT), Chagney Hunt <essetm(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >The whining is more than ludicrous. > >1. The Penalty: Ball in Lucas' possession, leg sticking out, missed >ball, a split second later, Lucas' leg connected. Academically >speaking, that was a foul hence a penalty. Lucas could have made extra >effort to avoid contact (which would have required athleticism that >would be questionable considering that he is Lucas), but that wouldn't >make it less a foul, only less obvious to the ref. Embellishment? Yes. >Blatant dive? No. >2. Kuyt's foul: OK... I don't know what the linesman saw, or didn't >see. It looked to me like a foul, from an angle that was opposite to >the linesman and away from the ball. Is it worth making a new Rashomon >out of it? >3. Lille were simply overmatched. They looked psyched out, lacking in >experiences for big match to me. No legit goal canceled, no break >called off for wrongful offside, no questionable pen uncalled -- >what's their claim to being robbed? Big match?
From: William Clark on 18 Mar 2010 20:17 In article <4ba2bbc3$0$21804$426a74cc(a)news.free.fr>, ixion martin - GdBx <ixion(a)martin.invalid> wrote: > Chagney Hunt a �mis l'id�e suivante : > > >> I insinuate that with both theorical teams with equal > >> levels, it's easier to win when you play in an English team. > >> Most of all Manchester and Liverpool. > > > > Which explains why Liverpool are in th Europa League? :-) > > They were so so bad. It's all. > > > Liverpool have benefited from some comical ref's errors, > > as usual. Aaah, go back to bitching about Attoub and Dupuy. Your Anglophobia is reaching dangerous levels.
From: ixion martin - GdBx on 19 Mar 2010 01:22
William Clark avait pr�tendu : > In article <4ba2bbc3$0$21804$426a74cc(a)news.free.fr>, > ixion martin - GdBx <ixion(a)martin.invalid> wrote: > >> Chagney Hunt a �mis l'id�e suivante : >> >>>> I insinuate that with both theorical teams with equal >>>> levels, it's easier to win when you play in an English >>>> team. Most of all Manchester and Liverpool. >>> >>> Which explains why Liverpool are in th Europa League? :-) >> >> They were so so bad. It's all. >> >>> Liverpool have benefited from some comical ref's errors, >> >> as usual. > > Aaah, go back to bitching about Attoub and Dupuy. Your > Anglophobia is reaching dangerous levels. Do you want to speak about Hartley ? -- Ixion Contre une �quipe �trang�re, quand on dit diplomatiquement que l'arbitre n'est pas dans un bon soir, c'est toujours le club fran�ais qui morfle. En s�lection, c'est parfois l'inverse. Dans ce cas, on ne nous le pardonne pas. |