SF 1: Uruguay - Netherlands [R]
in [World Football]
|
Prev: Jogi Löw macht Werbung für Popella
Next: Brad Friedel
From: Jesus Petry on 6 Jul 2010 17:05 On Jul 6, 6:01 pm, El Kot <nono.black.e...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sven Mischkies wrote: > > Futbolmetrix <futbolmet...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> <Kaise...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >>> Van Bronkhorst's goal was very similar to the one Haan scored > >>> against Italy in 1978 to put them in the final. It was from almost > >>> the same spot, and took almost the same trajectory, even though Haan > >>> did it with the top of his right foot and got some reverse spin on it.. > >>> Zoff and Fulsera dived vainly in just the same way. > > >> The incredible thing about GvB's shot is that it had the trajectory of a > >> normal football, not a Jabulani! > > > No, the incredible thing about GvB's shot is that he was allowed to take > > it and that the ref let MvB's red card seconds offense seconds earlie > > slip. > > I didn't notice any offence, let a lone a red-card one, in the > build-up. Will have to find a way to re-watch the situation. > > But apart from that, isn't everybody happy that Holland won? We want > a repeat of the '74 final, after all! I'm not. And I don't have anything against the Netherlands. Tchau! Jesus Petry
From: Mart van de Wege on 6 Jul 2010 17:22 "Lléo" <lleo_lm(a)lycos.com> writes: > "anders t" <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> escreveu na mensagem > news:4v3736t6nhu50ppaudlj6kfrircvqt6hi2(a)4ax.com... >> Quoting anders t in rec.sport.soccer: >>>Quoting Alessandro Riolo in rec.sport.soccer: >>>>"anders t" <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> wrote in message >>>>news:9q2736loa65grpu4qsl69vqs3maoaink78(a)4ax.com... >>>>> 1-2. >>>>> >>>>> Claims can be made it should have been denied due to offside. >>>>> >>>>> 1-3 >>>> >>>>If ends like that, it would be history, the 1st time an European team win >>>>the WC out of Europe :p >>> >>>Indeed. Spells are to be broken! >> >> Or are they...? 2-3 > > Another great end game involving Uruguay. They really go for it until the > very end. Too bad that they couldn't do it again. > > Hats off to la celeste. GREAT World Cup by them. > Indeed. I was impressed. The Dutch commentary (which *always* sucks, BTW) said "We're in the final" at the 1-3. It's as if Uruguay heard him and thought "Oh no you're not". Good determination; positive attitude. I liked 'em. The Netherlands were as usual in this tournament a bit boring. First 30 minutes after the break were better though. Mart -- "We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes." --- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
From: Jesus Petry on 6 Jul 2010 17:27 On Jul 6, 6:22 pm, Mart van de Wege <mvdw...(a)mail.com> wrote: > "Lléo" <lleo...(a)lycos.com> writes: > > "anders t" <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> escreveu na mensagem > >news:4v3736t6nhu50ppaudlj6kfrircvqt6hi2(a)4ax.com... > >> Quoting anders t in rec.sport.soccer: > >>>Quoting Alessandro Riolo in rec.sport.soccer: > >>>>"anders t" <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> wrote in message > >>>>news:9q2736loa65grpu4qsl69vqs3maoaink78(a)4ax.com... > >>>>> 1-2. > > >>>>> Claims can be made it should have been denied due to offside. > > >>>>> 1-3 > > >>>>If ends like that, it would be history, the 1st time an European team win > >>>>the WC out of Europe :p > > >>>Indeed. Spells are to be broken! > > >> Or are they...? 2-3 > > > Another great end game involving Uruguay. They really go for it until the > > very end. Too bad that they couldn't do it again. > > > Hats off to la celeste. GREAT World Cup by them. > > Indeed. > > I was impressed. The Dutch commentary (which *always* sucks, BTW) said > "We're in the final" at the 1-3. It's as if Uruguay heard him and > thought "Oh no you're not". > > Good determination; positive attitude. I liked 'em. > > The Netherlands were as usual in this tournament a bit boring. First 30 > minutes after the break were better though. Congrats on reaching the final! You have a great team. Tchau! Jesus Petry
From: d0asta on 6 Jul 2010 17:29 On 6 Juli, 23:03, Jesus Petry <jesuspe...(a)pop.com.br> wrote: > On Jul 6, 5:41 pm, Manx Gunner <goal(a)4thegunners!.com> wrote: > > > [Ll o <lleo...(a)lycos.com>] > > [Tue, 6 Jul 2010 17:26:37 -0300] > > > : Too bad that they couldn't do it again. > > > Too bad that they couldn't cheat their way forward again? Are you quite > > mad, sir, or do you just enjoy chaos? > > The only cheater on the pitch was dirty Van Bommel. Nah, he didn't get caught, you see. :-) Apart from his card which he totally did not understand.
From: Sven Mischkies on 6 Jul 2010 17:33
El Kot <nono.black.elko(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Sven Mischkies wrote: > > Futbolmetrix <futbolmetrix(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> <KaiserD2(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >>> Van Bronkhorst's goal was very similar to the one Haan scored > >>> against Italy in 1978 to put them in the final. It was from almost > >>> the same spot, and took almost the same trajectory, even though Haan > >>> did it with the top of his right foot and got some reverse spin on it. > >>> Zoff and Fulsera dived vainly in just the same way. > > > >> The incredible thing about GvB's shot is that it had the trajectory of a > >> normal football, not a Jabulani! > > > > > > No, the incredible thing about GvB's shot is that he was allowed to take > > it and that the ref let MvB's red card seconds offense seconds earlie > > slip. > > I didn't notice any offence, let a lone a red-card one, in the > build-up. Will have to find a way to re-watch the situation. > > But apart from that, isn't everybody happy that Holland won? We want > a repeat of the '74 final, after all! They are the dirtiest team in the competition, why would anybody be happy? Uruguay would have been more romantic, too - and what is special about a NL - ESP final anyway? ;) Ciao, SM -- http://www.gourockviews.co.uk I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting. But it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously. Douglas Adams |