From: vicky on
I hope you're all thoroughly ashamed.

1-4 Hull v Burnley 1.8 3.4 4.5
1-0 Wham v Sundercunts 2 3.25 3.35
0-3 Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4
1-0 SheffU v Cov 1.9 3.3 4.2
3-2 Preston v Scunthorpe 1.85 3.35 4.3
4-1 Tooncastle v Blackcockpool 1.38 4.5 11.5
3-0 Brentford v Hudderscock in the big all-Martin match 2.8 3.3 2.7

TMAK 889 -> 927 -> 928
Demo 567 -> 517 -> 518
BTN 217 -> 208 -> 209
Martin 149 -> 124 -> 125
Mikey 85 -> 88 -> 89
Goalie 70 -> 69 -> 70
Kevin 64 -> 50 -> 51
Conlan 47 -> 46 -> 47
Os 29 -> 19 -> 20
Joe 12 -> 6 -> 7
Sid 1 -> 0 -> 1
CJM 1 -> 0 -> 1
Cornelius 1


> Wham v Sundercunts ? ? ?2 ? 3.25 ? ? 3.35
BET: 38 Youks on West Minge to win please Party Political Broadcast.
TMAK 889
WIN. 851 + (38 x 2) = 927

>Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4
BET: 50 on a Villa win.
Demo 567
LOSE. 567 - 50 = 517

> Tooncastle v Blackcockpool ? 1.38 ? ? 4.5 ? ? ?11.5
I will bet my nine (9) on the AWAY win please, cockmuncher.
BTN 217
LOSE. 217 - 9 = 208

> Hull v Burnley 1.8 3.4 4.5
Mister M will have 25 Youks on Teh Hull to WIN, ta.
Martin 149
LOSE. 149 - 25 = 124

> SheffU v Cov 1.9 3.3 4.2
BET: 3 youks on a Sheffield United win, please, Lex Luger.
Mikey 85
WIN. 82 + (3 x 1.9) = 88

>Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4
BET: Y 1 on the HOME win.
Goalie 70
LOSE. 70 - 1 = 69

> Wham v Sundercunts 2 3.25 3.35
BET: 14 on the westhamSunderland draw
Kevin 64
LOSE. 64 - 14 = 50

> Tooncastle v Blackcockpool 1.38 4.5 11.5
BET: 1 on the drawer
Conlan 47
LOSE. 47 - 1 = 46

> Wham v Sundercunts 2 3.25 3.35
Meh, giz 10 Youks on the Sundercunting Sundercunts to WIN please Cory
Os 29
LOSE. 29 - 10 = 19

> Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4
BET: 6 on teh draws.
Joe 12
LOSE. 12 - 6 = 6

> Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4
AMY on the Vile, please.
Sid 1
LOSE. 1 - 1 = 0

> Hull v Burnley 1.8 3.4 4.5
BET: AMY on HOME WIN
CJM 1
LOSE. 1 - 1 = 0

From: nigel on
vicky(a)dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
>
> TMAK 889 -> 927 -> 928

As Garth Crooks said on 'Final Score' on Saturday, "Too little, too soon."


From: Tony McChrystal on
On 13 Apr, 09:46, nigel <use...(a)nospam.com> wrote:
> vi...(a)dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
>
> > TMAK        889 ->  927 ->  928
>
> As Garth Crooks said on 'Final Score' on Saturday, "Too little, too soon."

I've heard Garth Crooks' sentence structure boiled a linguist's brain
in his skull after he tried to find out which were the subordinate
clauses.

Dear Ben 'Loving' Nunn, could you please fix it for me to have the
odds posted tomorrow possibly please?

And also, could someone please take over my betcunting duties for next
week (week 36 I think)? The only parameters are that the bet is for a
maximum of 25 youks, and can only be for a victory. No drawererers
allowed, they're teh ghey.
From: vicky on
Demosthenes <demosthenes(a)theonering.net> wrote:
>>And also, could someone please take over my betcunting duties for next
>>week (week 36 I think)? The only parameters are that the bet is for a
>>maximum of 25 youks, and can only be for a victory. No drawererers
>>allowed, they're teh ghey.
>
> I'd probably have to confess to a conflict of interest here...

Which makes you the ideal candidate! I vote Demo for honourary TMackyness
for week 36!
From: Osbourne Ruddock on
<vicky(a)dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk> wrote in
news:82jf2pFt6kU1(a)mid.individual.net:

>>>And also, could someone please take over my betcunting duties for
>>>next week (week 36 I think)? The only parameters are that the bet is
>>>for a maximum of 25 youks, and can only be for a victory. No
>>>drawererers allowed, they're teh ghey.
>>
>> I'd probably have to confess to a conflict of interest here...
>
> Which makes you the ideal candidate! I vote Demo for honourary
> TMackyness for week 36!
>

Word Up.

What could go wrong....

--
Cheers, Os