From: vicky on 12 Apr 2010 19:50 I hope you're all thoroughly ashamed. 1-4 Hull v Burnley 1.8 3.4 4.5 1-0 Wham v Sundercunts 2 3.25 3.35 0-3 Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4 1-0 SheffU v Cov 1.9 3.3 4.2 3-2 Preston v Scunthorpe 1.85 3.35 4.3 4-1 Tooncastle v Blackcockpool 1.38 4.5 11.5 3-0 Brentford v Hudderscock in the big all-Martin match 2.8 3.3 2.7 TMAK 889 -> 927 -> 928 Demo 567 -> 517 -> 518 BTN 217 -> 208 -> 209 Martin 149 -> 124 -> 125 Mikey 85 -> 88 -> 89 Goalie 70 -> 69 -> 70 Kevin 64 -> 50 -> 51 Conlan 47 -> 46 -> 47 Os 29 -> 19 -> 20 Joe 12 -> 6 -> 7 Sid 1 -> 0 -> 1 CJM 1 -> 0 -> 1 Cornelius 1 > Wham v Sundercunts ? ? ?2 ? 3.25 ? ? 3.35 BET: 38 Youks on West Minge to win please Party Political Broadcast. TMAK 889 WIN. 851 + (38 x 2) = 927 >Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4 BET: 50 on a Villa win. Demo 567 LOSE. 567 - 50 = 517 > Tooncastle v Blackcockpool ? 1.38 ? ? 4.5 ? ? ?11.5 I will bet my nine (9) on the AWAY win please, cockmuncher. BTN 217 LOSE. 217 - 9 = 208 > Hull v Burnley 1.8 3.4 4.5 Mister M will have 25 Youks on Teh Hull to WIN, ta. Martin 149 LOSE. 149 - 25 = 124 > SheffU v Cov 1.9 3.3 4.2 BET: 3 youks on a Sheffield United win, please, Lex Luger. Mikey 85 WIN. 82 + (3 x 1.9) = 88 >Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4 BET: Y 1 on the HOME win. Goalie 70 LOSE. 70 - 1 = 69 > Wham v Sundercunts 2 3.25 3.35 BET: 14 on the westhamSunderland draw Kevin 64 LOSE. 64 - 14 = 50 > Tooncastle v Blackcockpool 1.38 4.5 11.5 BET: 1 on the drawer Conlan 47 LOSE. 47 - 1 = 46 > Wham v Sundercunts 2 3.25 3.35 Meh, giz 10 Youks on the Sundercunting Sundercunts to WIN please Cory Os 29 LOSE. 29 - 10 = 19 > Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4 BET: 6 on teh draws. Joe 12 LOSE. 12 - 6 = 6 > Vile v Chelsea in teh Cup 8.5 4.2 1.4 AMY on the Vile, please. Sid 1 LOSE. 1 - 1 = 0 > Hull v Burnley 1.8 3.4 4.5 BET: AMY on HOME WIN CJM 1 LOSE. 1 - 1 = 0
From: nigel on 13 Apr 2010 04:46 vicky(a)dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote: > > TMAK 889 -> 927 -> 928 As Garth Crooks said on 'Final Score' on Saturday, "Too little, too soon."
From: Tony McChrystal on 13 Apr 2010 06:40 On 13 Apr, 09:46, nigel <use...(a)nospam.com> wrote: > vi...(a)dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote: > > > TMAK 889 -> 927 -> 928 > > As Garth Crooks said on 'Final Score' on Saturday, "Too little, too soon." I've heard Garth Crooks' sentence structure boiled a linguist's brain in his skull after he tried to find out which were the subordinate clauses. Dear Ben 'Loving' Nunn, could you please fix it for me to have the odds posted tomorrow possibly please? And also, could someone please take over my betcunting duties for next week (week 36 I think)? The only parameters are that the bet is for a maximum of 25 youks, and can only be for a victory. No drawererers allowed, they're teh ghey.
From: vicky on 13 Apr 2010 10:57 Demosthenes <demosthenes(a)theonering.net> wrote: >>And also, could someone please take over my betcunting duties for next >>week (week 36 I think)? The only parameters are that the bet is for a >>maximum of 25 youks, and can only be for a victory. No drawererers >>allowed, they're teh ghey. > > I'd probably have to confess to a conflict of interest here... Which makes you the ideal candidate! I vote Demo for honourary TMackyness for week 36!
From: Osbourne Ruddock on 13 Apr 2010 18:00 <vicky(a)dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk> wrote in news:82jf2pFt6kU1(a)mid.individual.net: >>>And also, could someone please take over my betcunting duties for >>>next week (week 36 I think)? The only parameters are that the bet is >>>for a maximum of 25 youks, and can only be for a victory. No >>>drawererers allowed, they're teh ghey. >> >> I'd probably have to confess to a conflict of interest here... > > Which makes you the ideal candidate! I vote Demo for honourary > TMackyness for week 36! > Word Up. What could go wrong.... -- Cheers, Os
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: [SBL 2009/2010] Week 32 Odds template for Ben Next: WHEEK 35 Results - CORRECTION |