Prev: [SBL 2009/2010] Week 32 Odds template for Ben
Next: WHEEK 35 Results - CORRECTION
From: Sir Benjamin Nunn on 14 Apr 2010 06:01
"Tony McChrystal" <tony.mcchrystal(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:6d4f291c-db38-4c12-a4f4-2771f583b343(a)g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
> Dear Ben 'Loving' Nunn, could you please fix it for me to have the
> odds posted tomorrow possibly please?


Maybe if you didn't go around unfriending people on Facebook just because
they are different from you, you might get luckier in the karmic
having-odds-posted-at-a-time-of-your-choosing stakes, hmm?

BTN

From: nigel on 14 Apr 2010 07:50
Demosthenes wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 03:40:29 -0700 (PDT), Tony McChrystal
> <tony.mcchrystal(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On 13 Apr, 09:46, nigel <use...(a)nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>vi...(a)dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>TMAK 889 -> 927 -> 928
>>>
>>>As Garth Crooks said on 'Final Score' on Saturday, "Too little, too soon."
>>
>>I've heard Garth Crooks' sentence structure boiled a linguist's brain
>>in his skull after he tried to find out which were the subordinate
>>clauses.
>>
>>Dear Ben 'Loving' Nunn, could you please fix it for me to have the
>>odds posted tomorrow possibly please?
>>
>>And also, could someone please take over my betcunting duties for next
>>week (week 36 I think)? The only parameters are that the bet is for a
>>maximum of 25 youks, and can only be for a victory. No drawererers
>>allowed, they're teh ghey.
>
>
> I'd probably have to confess to a conflict of interest here...
>
>
It would be fascinating to see how you'd try to take advantage.

Would you sabotage TMAK (difficult, considering the 25 youk limit) and
place a decent betcunt of your own in the hope of being out of sight
before the last week, or would you place a decent betcunt for TMAK and a
poor one for yourself in the hope of TMAK going into the last week one
youk ahead of you?

From: Tony McChrystal on 14 Apr 2010 08:02
On 14 Apr, 11:01, "Sir Benjamin Nunn" <benn...(a)depro.co.uk> wrote:
> "Tony McChrystal" <tony.mcchrys...(a)googlemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6d4f291c-db38-4c12-a4f4-2771f583b343(a)g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Dear Ben 'Loving' Nunn, could you please fix it for me to have the
> > odds posted tomorrow possibly please?
>
> Maybe if you didn't go around unfriending people on Facebook just because
> they are different from you, you might get luckier in the karmic
> having-odds-posted-at-a-time-of-your-choosing stakes, hmm?

It all worked out in the end though didn't it? You found love, and I
found less references to convicted paedophile murderers on my Facebook
wall. Win-win all round as far as I can tell.

From: Osbourne Ruddock on 14 Apr 2010 16:49
Tony McChrystal <tony.mcchrystal(a)googlemail.com> wrote in
news:8ff8aba9-5ddb-453f-b121-2ce36fe7f09c(a)r1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:

>> Maybe if you didn't go around unfriending people on Facebook just
>> because they are different from you, you might get luckier in the
>> karmic having-odds-posted-at-a-time-of-your-choosing stakes, hmm?
>
> It all worked out in the end though didn't it? You found love, and I
> found less references to convicted paedophile murderers on my Facebook
> wall. Win-win all round as far as I can tell.
>

I think this should happen more often TBH. If Mikey unfriended Glenn Beck
on Facebook for instance, GB might find that hentai is a more life
enhancing pursuit than rabid teabagging talking point hysteria while
Mikey would no longer have to view Beck's frankly staggering collection
of photos of Premier League football players penises.

You might be onto something here TMAK, you really might.

--
Cheers, Os
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: [SBL 2009/2010] Week 32 Odds template for Ben
Next: WHEEK 35 Results - CORRECTION