Prev: World Cup Ratings 2010 - Statistical Football Simulations
Next: cheap wholesale nike retro shoes
From: SirBenjamin on 30 Apr 2010 09:58
On Apr 30, 9:31 am, <vi...(a)dinky.vm.bytemark.co.uk> wrote:
> SirBenjamin <benn...(a)depro.co.uk> wrote:
> > Stoke v evercunrts      2.9     3.4     2.1
>
> BET: 3 on the draw
>
> > Hampstead & Kilburn     3.9      3.7      1.8
>
> BET: AMY on other


Err... that would be a maximum bet of 3 youks then. Read the teh
rules.


> > Conlan      1   ->  3   ->  4
>
> I think you should have had Harlow in your betting.  They had a labour
> majority of 94, iirc, last time, down from about 19000 2 elections before
> that.  


That makes it a not-particularly-interesting seat this time though,
Conlan.

The Tories will take it comfortably with a majority of around 4000,
and I'd be very surprised if either party was putting in much work
there (though the Lib Dems might be doing so on the sly, of course).

BTN
From: Tony McChrystal on 30 Apr 2010 10:41
On 29 Apr, 13:20, SirBenjamin <benn...(a)depro.co.uk> wrote:
> ****House Off terrible teh Hopefull Youks wrongheaded ghey paper-me-

> Pompey v wolfs      2.5      3.45       3

BET: 30 on Pompghey to win please Swingometer (Home)

> OPTOSHIRLEY ELECTION ROUND

> Tooting - a key battleground; the exact seat that, on a uniform swing,
> the Tories need to achieve an overall majority of 2.
>                        CON       LAB        OTHER
> Tooting                        1.7       2.5       12

BET: 20 on Cameron's porcelain-headed Bullingdon Boys Band to win
please (CON to gain Tooting)

> TMAK        900 ->  899 ->  900

Let's all sail into the sky with our Big Society, holding hands and
pissing freely.
From: vicky on 30 Apr 2010 11:36
SirBenjamin <bennunn(a)depro.co.uk> wrote:
>> > Stoke v evercunrts ? ? ?2.9 ? ? 3.4 ? ? 2.1
>>
>> BET: 3 on the draw
>>
>> > Hampstead & Kilburn ? ? 3.9 ? ? ?3.7 ? ? ?1.8
>>
>> BET: AMY on other
>
> Err... that would be a maximum bet of 3 youks then. Read the teh
> rules.

Since I'm expecting the first bet to lose, it doesn't make much difference.
But ok.

>> I think you should have had Harlow in your betting. ?They had a labour
>> majority of 94, iirc, last time, down from about 19000 2 elections before
>> that. ?
> That makes it a not-particularly-interesting seat this time though,
> Conlan.
>
> The Tories will take it comfortably with a majority of around 4000,
> and I'd be very surprised if either party was putting in much work
> there (though the Lib Dems might be doing so on the sly, of course).

Hmm.
From: SirBenjamin on 30 Apr 2010 11:40
On Apr 29, 1:20 pm, SirBenjamin <benn...(a)depro.co.uk> wrote:
> ****House Off terrible teh Hopefull Youks wrongheaded ghey paper-me-
> do**$*

> Pompey v wolfs      2.5      3.45       3


BET: 11 Youks on the HOME win please, Pomps


> Tooting                        1.7       2.5       12


BET: 11 Youks on the LABOUR win please, Sadiq Khan.

ghey

BTN
From: CJM on 30 Apr 2010 11:53


"SirBenjamin" <bennunn(a)depro.co.uk> wrote in message
news:53808836-06a6-4ffb-9cbb-013e1a75ddd9(a)s29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

> The Tories will take it comfortably with a majority of around 4000,
> and I'd be very surprised if either party was putting in much work
> there (though the Lib Dems might be doing so on the sly, of course).
>

Everything the Lib Dems do is on the sly... Recent tricks include producing
literature that either looks like rival candidates work, or producing
documents that appear to be from various public sector bodies.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: World Cup Ratings 2010 - Statistical Football Simulations
Next: cheap wholesale nike retro shoes