From: Chagney Hunt on 12 Jun 2010 08:18 HT: 1-0, should have been 3-0. ROK scuffed several one on one, they were also denied a stonewall pen and got called on a non-existent foul when Park Jisung got through.
From: Manx Gunner on 12 Jun 2010 08:23 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:18:53 -0700 (PDT), Chagney Hunt wrote... > HT: 1-0, should have been 3-0. ROK scuffed several one on one, they > were also denied a stonewall pen and got called on a non-existent foul > when Park Jisung got through. Yep, the Greeks don't look like they want to be on the pitch. Strange that the stadium is so empty, don't you think?
From: ken.overton on 12 Jun 2010 08:25 On Jun 12, 8:18 am, Chagney Hunt <ess...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > HT: 1-0, should have been 3-0. ROK scuffed several one on one, they > were also denied a stonewall pen and got called on a non-existent foul > when Park Jisung got through. Ah, I just posted not knowing you'd already done so. I thought the 'non-existent foul' was called a handball?
From: Chagney Hunt on 12 Jun 2010 08:39 On Jun 12, 8:31 am, anders t <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> wrote: > Quoting Chagney Hunt in rec.sport.soccer: > > >HT: 1-0, should have been 3-0. ROK scuffed several one on one, they > >were also denied a stonewall pen and got called on a non-existent foul > >when Park Jisung got through. > > Well, if you're into converting scoring chances at a maximal rate it should > have been 3-1, or possibly 3-2, no? I wasn't aware Greece had any chance remotely as clear as the non- called pen or the one-on-one :-) Anyway, 2-0 now, they'd do well to start RUTSing.
From: KaiserD2 on 12 Jun 2010 08:41 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:39:05 -0700 (PDT), Chagney Hunt <essetm(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Jun 12, 8:31�am, anders t <anthu_001(a)no_-_spam_.hotmail.com> wrote: >> Quoting Chagney Hunt in rec.sport.soccer: >> >> >HT: 1-0, should have been 3-0. ROK scuffed several one on one, they >> >were also denied a stonewall pen and got called on a non-existent foul >> >when Park Jisung got through. >> >> Well, if you're into converting scoring chances at a maximal rate it should >> have been 3-1, or possibly 3-2, no? > >I wasn't aware Greece had any chance remotely as clear as the non- >called pen or the one-on-one :-) > >Anyway, 2-0 now, they'd do well to start RUTSing. What a fantastic goal by Park. This was supposed to be the most boring match and I just turned it on in my bedroom after getting up. Just goes to show, you can't predict! I"m very sad that I have to be driving for Argentina-Nigeria and dont' know when I'll see it (obviously I ain't going to miss E - US), but South Korea looks ready to make this a very interesting group. DK
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Matchday Two Predictions, Group A Next: World cup club score [R for all matches implied] |