Nick Griffin and his Abnormal Involuntary Movements
in [Everton]
|
Next: Jags out fo rlonger
From: Baldoni on 23 Oct 2009 14:32 Red Rackham wrote on 23/10/2009 : > "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:vYkEm.18593$Mz.7845(a)newsfe22.ams2... >> >> "Red Rackham" <ONeil37(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:BUkEm.61844$7l.58126(a)newsfe13.ams2... >>> >>> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:hSkEm.18591$Mz.17648(a)newsfe22.ams2... >>>> >>>> "Pope Pompous XVIII" <popepompousxviii(a)iol.ie> wrote in message >>>> news:pan.2009.10.23.16.25.11(a)popesnews.invalid... >>>>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:20:17 +0100, Red Rackham wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Pope Pompous XVIII" <popepompousxviii(a)iol.ie> wrote in message >>>>>> news:pan.2009.10.23.16.18.15(a)popesnews.invalid... >>>>>>> On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:48:59 +0100, Baldoni wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Red Rackham submitted this idea : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> And the Nazis were, unless I'm very much mistaken, rather prominent >>>>>>>>> examples of dedicated followers of Fascism. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That was the Kinks mate "dedicated followers of Fascism" !!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ROFLMFAO!! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thought that might have been too subtle for you. >>>>> >>>>> I don't laugh at your jokes. Only Baldoni's. >>>> >>>> Balders is amusing, Timmy the stinky leftie bigot isn't. >>> >>> >>> Which of my views do you find to be bigoted? >>> >>> Just wondering. >>> >>> TIA >> >> The ones where you mock or abuse someone because of his political (Griffin) >> or religious (Popey) beliefs. It's about being prejudiced towards someone >> whose beliefs are different to your own. And yes, I've done it too, I'm a >> bigot. > > I would be being prejudiced if I judged Griffin before I head his views. But > I have heard them. The ones he tries to keep from public consumption. They're > odious. It isn't bigoted to be opposed to Nazism. National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP), Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei Very different entity to the BNP -- Count Baldoni In hoc signo vinces
From: Baldoni on 23 Oct 2009 14:35 Legend11 submitted this idea : > Red Rackham wrote: >> "Mentalguy2k8" <Mentalguy2k8(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:gqjEm.17282$Mz.2083(a)newsfe22.ams2... >>> "Scouse Power" <powerscouse(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>> news:7kdrprF39t9ifU1(a)mid.individual.net... >>>> Did you see him last night on BBC's Question Time? Hardly Aryan material, >>>> was he? >>>> Arf! >>> At least he turned up.... a shithouse wouldn't have. >> >> No, but a racist, Nazi attention-seeking, moronic shithouse would have. >> >> > > The real idiots in all this were those loony bastards campaigning for him not > to go on. They should have him on every bloody week - for the simple reason > he invariably hangs himself with his own words, his transparency and > two-faced nature. It will give some of the more clueless who voted BNP a real > vision of who and what he is and why the BNP is even unwise as a protest > vote. > > However, I also noted it was left up to the Asian and Black panellists to > broach the subject of our increasingly lax and silly immigrations laws. > Thanks to the present politicians (all of them) and their tactic of enforcing > an over-the-top political correctness agenda upon us all, white folks are > quite literally scared to bring this debate up, for fear of being branded a > racist. Leaving people with lesser scruples or intellect to see the BNP as > the only viable choice. Thankfully, this is something those two ladies never > had to worry about. Hopefully now we can address genuine concerns over > immigration, which should have nothing to do with how many people of colour > are here....just how many are here full stop. Like the Asian lady said, it's > not about black or brown, it's about resources. Limited resources at that. > > Let us all take advantage of the opportunity Question Time has now given us > and express these genuine concerns without being made to feel like a racist. > > -- > Legend11 > Manchester United - Premiership Champions Three Times Running. The fly in the ointment is "multiculturalism", America was built on immigration but Americans are first and formost Americans. -- Count Baldoni In hoc signo vinces
From: Les D on 23 Oct 2009 15:16 "Scouse Power" <powerscouse(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:7kdrprF39t9ifU1(a)mid.individual.net... > Did you see him last night on BBC's Question Time? Hardly Aryan material, > was he? > Arf!
From: Les D on 23 Oct 2009 15:18 "Les D" <ldnw44144(a)blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:ZinEm.77802$877.15777(a)newsfe16.ams2... > > "Scouse Power" <powerscouse(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:7kdrprF39t9ifU1(a)mid.individual.net... >> Did you see him last night on BBC's Question Time? Hardly Aryan material, >> was he? >> Arf! > > I reckon it was the best piece of telly viewing for many a moon. Griffin is somewhat uncouth but I do see beneath the surface of the issues he is trying to convey. Les D
From: Les D on 23 Oct 2009 19:06
Good to see you back in here, Mr. D. Is this a regular visit? I'm not sure, fella'. I'm simply looking for a bit of intelligent conversation. Football (Everton) is getting a bit stale for me. That's not what Griffin is about. I don't think he's the next Oswald Mosley. What I believe is that the BNP are the sweetener. By that, I mean that there is a political shift planned. Griffin is simply the first step. Mm. I like that. I never considered that way of looking at it. They are all the same person. They share the same policies. They offer nothing different to an apothetic voting population. You could toss a three (or should that be 2) sided coin and predict the outcome of the next general election right now. Agreed. Remember they are voting in a 2 party system. A 2 party system that is actually a 1 party system when it comes to policy. It matters not whether Labour or Conservative win, they both occupy the same political space. Agreed, again. And that. My friend is what Griffin's appearance on QT gave us. And, for those who believe I meant simply "one side" there, the left will also prosper from his appearance. Yes mate, you're right (agreed x 3). There'll be more interesting marches than the "Spirit of Shankly" over the coming years. Hehe ;o) Les D |