Most mediocre teams to win the WC
in [World Football]
|
From: higgs on 18 Jul 2010 07:41 On Jul 18, 5:32 pm, "Paul C" <p...(a)thersgb.net> wrote: > "Clarkoo" <gabl...(a)yahoo.es> wrote in message > > news:f2377ff3-d823-4263-981c-d882747c7093(a)z10g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > >. I'm also told that > > Argentina 78 were pretty bad > > Who told you that? I'll back that up. Peru weren't a bad team. There was no way Argentina could have beaten them 6-0 without outside interference
From: ixion martin - GdBx on 18 Jul 2010 07:52 Le 17/07/2010, JCQ a suppos� : > On Jul 17, 8:28�am, Clarkoo <gabl...(a)yahoo.es> wrote: >> In my lifetime Italy 2006 definetely and Brasil 94. I'm also >> told that Argentina 78 were pretty bad and they needed "an >> extra push" (if you know what I'm saying" to win that WC. > > I agree about 2006 and 1994. I don't for 1994. Forget the final and see other games, like versus Sweden (both), Russia, Nederlands... Italy 2006 was not mediocre. Don't focalize ont the penalty versus Australia : 3-0 Ukrain, 2-0 Germany at home, 2-0 Ghana, 2-0 Czech Republic... -- Ixion Contre une �quipe �trang�re, quand on dit diplomatiquement que l'arbitre n'est pas dans un bon soir, c'est toujours le club fran�ais qui morfle.
From: Quincy on 18 Jul 2010 09:23 On 18 Jul., 08:21, Italian Mike <italian.mik...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Spain, probably the best team of the tournament, behind Brazil this > year, and certainly play acted more than any other team. It's highly amusing how you Italians still disregad Germany despite them having scored 16 goals on the hardes paths (Group of Death/ England/Argentina/Spain) to the finals in the WC history...
From: Clarkoo on 18 Jul 2010 09:51 On Jul 18, 9:23 am, Quincy <ab...(a)email.de> wrote: > On 18 Jul., 08:21, Italian Mike <italian.mik...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Spain, probably the best team of the tournament, behind Brazil this > > year, and certainly play acted more than any other team. > > It's highly amusing how you Italians still disregad Germany despite > them having scored 16 goals on the hardes paths (Group of Death/ > England/Argentina/Spain) to the finals in the WC history... I think Germany played the best football of the tournament. Their counter attack moves against England and Argentina are the best I've seen in my life. Perfect choreography and Schweinsteiger might have a freaking annoying last name but he's proven to be an awesome distributor of the ball. This is the best Germany of my lifetime.
From: Quincy on 18 Jul 2010 09:58
On 18 Jul., 15:51, Clarkoo <gabl...(a)yahoo.es> wrote: > On Jul 18, 9:23 am, Quincy <ab...(a)email.de> wrote: > > > On 18 Jul., 08:21, Italian Mike <italian.mik...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Spain, probably the best team of the tournament, behind Brazil this > > > year, and certainly play acted more than any other team. > > > It's highly amusing how you Italians still disregad Germany despite > > them having scored 16 goals on the hardes paths (Group of Death/ > > England/Argentina/Spain) to the finals in the WC history... > > I think Germany played the best football of the tournament. Their > counter attack moves against England and Argentina are the best I've > seen in my life. Perfect choreography and Schweinsteiger might have a > freaking annoying last name but he's proven to be an awesome > distributor of the ball. This is the best Germany of my lifetime. Lahm said it before the tournament: "This is the best team I ever played". With a good expert eye you could see it before, how the U21 Team dismantled England exactly with that kind of counterstrikes or how Germany scored that 0-1 in Russia (which wrote history btw). Anyway you are right, it was the best Germany of my lifetime before, only the 1990 team that won the World Cup was comparable, but it was a completely different kind of team. They were more dominant, but also more mechanical and more "typical German", and weren't able to create better games against the Czechs and specially against Argentina in the final. |