From: Futbolmetrix on 24 Jul 2010 13:27 "milivella" <milivella(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ca8f209a-9f94-447b-a194-2c68b4739690(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > >> AMR: Rosicky > > Out of position: 0. :( Oh, come on....Stupid, stupid FM! The offensive midfield line should have been: AMR: Aquilani AMC: Rosicky AML: Robben
From: The Scrutineer on 24 Jul 2010 14:04 >> Here's an easy one: Injury-prone XI (yeah, I could just pick the whole >> Juve >> line-up, but I'll try to do better): I will try injury prone too, here's my XI D R - Phil Degen D C - John Woodgate D C - Ledley King D L - Kieran Gibbs MC - Owen Hargraeves MC - - David Dunn AM R- Kieron Dyer M C - Jimmy Bullard AM L - Harry Kewell F C - Robin van Persie Assuming we only use current players!!!
From: milivella on 24 Jul 2010 14:15 Futbolmetrix: > "milivella" <milive...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:ca8f209a-9f94-447b-a194-2c68b4739690(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> AMR: Rosicky > > > Out of position: 0. :( > > Oh, come on....Stupid, stupid FM! No, stupid milivella's rules! FM have Rosicky quite settled on the right (70%), but I've stated that he should be counted as 0. :( Another stupid rule is multiplying skill * overall_value. Let's assume that a great player who is good at passing is a better dribbler than a mediocre player who is good at passing... but *neither* a loyal great player is more loyal than a loyal mediocre player, *nor* an injury- prone great player has more injuries that a injury-prone mediocre player! The only way to make sense of it is to think that you are trying to set up a team of _great_ loyal o injury-prone players. Weak, I know, but let's say so: "Your goal is to set up a 4-2-3-1 (no goalkeeper) such that all the players are very good *both generally and* in a particular skill." -- Cheers milivella
From: milivella on 24 Jul 2010 14:35 The Scrutineer: > >> Here's an easy one: Injury-prone XI (yeah, I could just pick the whole > >> Juve > >> line-up, but I'll try to do better): > > I will try injury prone too, here's my XI I guess that you haven't tried to pick *great* injury-prone players but just very injury-prone players, since the rules weren't clear. Of course your fault at all, so let's do in the following way: we'll have two ranking, one based on skill only, one on skill*greatness. Sorry, it was my fault, and I know that is just a patch, but it's hopefully better than nothing. Here are the scores of your players (the first one is skill*greatness, the second one is skill only) > D R - Phil Degen 0.63 1.00 > D C - John Woodgate 0.67 0.85 > D C - Ledley King 0.77 1.00 > D L - Kieran Gibbs 0.22 0.35 > MC - Owen Hargraeves 0.46 0.55 > MC - - David Dunn Out of position: 0.00 :( > AM R- Kieron Dyer 0.64 0.90 > M C - Jimmy Bullard 0.32 0.45 > AM L - Harry Kewell 0.60 0.80 > F C - Robin van Persie 0.66 0.80 Total: 4.97 6.70 Before posting the ranking, I've to compute the "skill only" score of Daniele's team: 0.90 Zebina 0.75 Agger 0.95 Nesta 0.75 Chivu 0.90 C. Zanetti 0.35 Mohammed Sissoko (Juve) 0.00 Rosicky 0.60 Joe Cole 0.75 Robben 0.65 Iaquinta 6.60 Total So the rankings are: Skill*Greatness 5.44 Futbolmetrix Injury Proneness 4.97 The Scrutineer Injury Proneness Skill only 6.70 The Scrutineer Injury Proneness 6.60 Futbolmetrix Injury Proneness > Assuming we only use current players!!! Yes we do. Sorry, I had to specify it. -- Cheers milivella
From: milivella on 24 Jul 2010 14:41
milivella: (Too many errors... I should stop posting!) > Another stupid rule is multiplying skill * overall_value. Let's assume > that a great player who is good at passing is a better passer (!) > than a > mediocre player who is good at passing... but *neither* a loyal great > player is more loyal than a loyal mediocre player, *nor* an injury- > prone great player has more injuries that a injury-prone mediocre > player! The only way to make sense of it is to think that you are > trying to set up a team of _great_ loyal o injury-prone players. Weak, > I know, but let's say so: > "Your goal is to set up a 4-2-3-1 (no goalkeeper) such that all the > players are very good *both generally and* in a particular skill." or: "not only great, but also very good at a particular skill" -- Cheers milivella |