Masons fleece hospital worker
in [Liverpool]
|
Prev: FAQ: Does Masonry have a religious agenda or practice known only to higher Masons?
Next: Cole, "Liverpool biggest club in the world"
From: Darth Simian on 22 Jul 2010 08:15 Gillian Borthwick has learned not to trust Freemasons the hard way. A BAR worker has lodged a legal battle against a Freemasons social club for her alleged unfair dismissal. Gillian Borthwick says Beach Lane Social Club in Portobello owes her for unpaid wages and holiday pay, after she lost her job in January this year. But the club is arguing that Ms Borthwick was not a contracted employee and was only hired as a casual worker. Ms Borthwick, who works full-time at the Sick Kids hospital, put her case to an employment tribunal in Edinburgh yesterday. She said she considered herself to have the same rights as everyone else. -- "They can at least tell me, 'I'm sorry.' They were supposed to be Bill's brothers. Well brothers don't treat brothers that way." Mrs Wendy James, wife of a new Masonic recruit to Southside Masonic Baphomery in Patchogue, New York, who was shot in the head and killed during a ritual by Grand Master Albert Pike Eid.
From: - on 22 Jul 2010 08:57 More Munich shite Bellend
From: Aaron on 22 Jul 2010 09:22 On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:15:16 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian <great_sage_equal_of_heaven_(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Gillian Borthwick has learned not to trust Freemasons the hard way. > >A BAR worker has lodged a legal battle against a Freemasons social >club for her alleged unfair dismissal. >Gillian Borthwick says Beach Lane Social Club in Portobello owes her >for unpaid wages and holiday pay, after she lost her job in January >this year. > >But the club is arguing that Ms Borthwick was not a contracted >employee and was only hired as a casual worker. > >Ms Borthwick, who works full-time at the Sick Kids hospital, put her >case to an employment tribunal in Edinburgh yesterday. She said she >considered herself to have the same rights as everyone else. She is suing for unemployment compensation from a job she never had. The social club (NOT the Freemasons) may have to pay her for having been charitable to a dishonest woman due to a technicality in the law.
From: Darth Simian on 23 Jul 2010 07:56 On 22 July, 14:22, Aaron <a...(a)home.net> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:15:16 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian > > <great_sage_equal_of_heav...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >Gillian Borthwick has learned not to trust Freemasons the hard way. > > >A BAR worker has lodged a legal battle against a Freemasons social > >club for her alleged unfair dismissal. > >Gillian Borthwick says Beach Lane Social Club in Portobello owes her > >for unpaid wages and holiday pay, after she lost her job in January > >this year. > > >But the club is arguing that Ms Borthwick was not a contracted > >employee and was only hired as a casual worker. > > >Ms Borthwick, who works full-time at the Sick Kids hospital, put her > >case to an employment tribunal in Edinburgh yesterday. She said she > >considered herself to have the same rights as everyone else. > > She is suing for unemployment compensation from a job she never had. > The social club (NOT the Freemasons) may have to pay her for having > been charitable to a dishonest woman due to a technicality in the law. There always seems to be a convenient buffer between these crimes and your order Aaron. Like when Bill James got his brains blown out by Albert Pike Eid in New York. The hit wasnt approved by three Grand Masters, so the Freemasons are completely innocent in your eyes again. A higher judge awaits you Aaron, and your brethren. -- "They can at least tell me, 'I'm sorry.' They were supposed to be Bill's brothers. Well brothers don't treat brothers that way." Mrs Wendy James, wife of a new Masonic recruit to Southside Masonic Baphomery in Patchogue, New York, who was shot in the head and killed during a ritual by Grand Master Albert Pike Eid.
From: Aaron on 23 Jul 2010 13:08
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:56:24 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian <great_sage_equal_of_heaven_(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On 22 July, 14:22, Aaron <a...(a)home.net> wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 05:15:16 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian >> >> <great_sage_equal_of_heav...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >Gillian Borthwick has learned not to trust Freemasons the hard way. >> >> >A BAR worker has lodged a legal battle against a Freemasons social >> >club for her alleged unfair dismissal. >> >Gillian Borthwick says Beach Lane Social Club in Portobello owes her >> >for unpaid wages and holiday pay, after she lost her job in January >> >this year. >> >> >But the club is arguing that Ms Borthwick was not a contracted >> >employee and was only hired as a casual worker. >> >> >Ms Borthwick, who works full-time at the Sick Kids hospital, put her >> >case to an employment tribunal in Edinburgh yesterday. She said she >> >considered herself to have the same rights as everyone else. >> >> She is suing for unemployment compensation from a job she never had. >> The social club (NOT the Freemasons) may have to pay her for having >> been charitable to a dishonest woman due to a technicality in the law. > >There always seems to be a convenient buffer between these crimes and >your order Aaron. The truth can be very convinient when one obeys the law. >Like when Bill James got his brains blown out by >Albert 'Pike' Eid in New York. DS, you are being dishonest again. You know that there is no such person as Albert 'Pike' Eid. You also know that the club using the Masonic Lodge was not a Masonic organization. You also know that Mr Eid refused to defend himself because he felt so bad about the accident. >The hit wasn't approved by three Grand >Masters, so the Freemasons are completely innocent in your eyes >again. You just make stuff up, don't you. You know that there was an accident, not a "hit." You know that no Masonic organization approved any "hit," or the use of a fire arm even one loadd with blanks. You know that all Masons involved were expelled from Masonry. You know that the Lodge in question lost its Charter for nor preventing the tragedy. >A higher judge awaits you Aaron, and your brethren. Since you do not seem to know anything about God and have no respect for His Word, I do not believe that you actually believe that God will judge anyone. If you did, you would not bear false witness. To date, you have still not come up with any actual objection to Masonry, you just tell lies. You have never even said that you object to anything that actually goes on in masonry or the things that Masonry does. You just make up wild stories or parrot stories that have already been disproved. That does not make sense. If you really objected to Masonry you would make a better argument. I can only believe that you hate Christianity and want to make Christians do evil so you can make fun of the people foolish enough to violate their own religious beliefs just because their enemy (you) tells them something that is obviously false or unrelated to the question. |