Prev: Where are the African "flair" players?
Next: My Formal Rather Belated Introduction!!!
From: Jellore on 6 Apr 2010 06:23
On Apr 6, 1:25 pm, Abubakr <deltara...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 Apr, 12:40, Jellore <jell...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 5, 10:44 pm, Abubakr <deltara...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 4 Apr, 12:57, Jellore <jell...(a)bigpond.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 4, 11:53 am, Abubakr <deltara...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On 4 Apr, 06:07, REDDEV...(a)nospam.net wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 18:21:15 +0000 (UTC), Sid
>
> > > > > > <sid(a)invalid_nerte.invalid.invalid_net.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > >* Clément [2010-04-03 08:58] [rec.sport.soccer]:
> > > > > > >> On Apr 3, 10:25 am, anders t wrote:
> > > > > > >>> I hope Abramovich had to pay the linesman a very high premium for that 2-0
> > > > > > >>> goal.
>
> > > > > > >> It does suck, eh? I'll say it again, there's no good reason for such
> > > > > > >> goals to stand in football. It's an embarrassment. (I won't comment on
> > > > > > >> Macheda's goal because I need to see it again).
>
> > > > > > >I don't think it was a handball. I replayed it a few times and it
> > > > > > >appears to come off his upper-right chest/shoulder. Of course, I am
> > > > > > >a United supporter, so I might have just wanted to see that.
>
> > > > > > >> Back to football, Man U's 1st half showing (or no-showing) cost you
> > > > > > >> the game. Also worth mentioning that 2 players who were subbed in
> > > > > > >> combined to get Chelsea's 2nd goal, so gotta give Ancelotti some
> > > > > > >> credit on that one (refereeing mistake aside).
>
> > > > > > >True, just like the 2 players who were subbed in combining to get
> > > > > > >United's first. (one of them accidentally, of course)
>
> > > > > > >A draw would have been nice, but we showed nothing in the first half
> > > > > > >and it is how it is.
>
> > > > > > >Sid
>
> > > > > > Chelsea dominated the first half and United dominated the second half,
> > > > > > there were a few poor ref decisions. Chelsea should have had a penalty
> > > > > > when Gary Neville barged in and United should have had a penalty when
> > > > > > Park was fouled. The United goal came off Macheda's shoulder/chest and
> > > > > > was no hand ball. The second Chelsea goal was way offside. that said
> > > > > > Chelsea shaded it overall and were worth the points.
>
> > > > > There were two bad decisions, but luckily they cancelled each other
> > > > > out: Drogba's obviously offside goal and Neville's barging Anelka
> > > > > over. Park and Manure supporters are dreaming if they think that
> > > > > incident deserved a PK.
>
> > > > > Apart from that, Chelsea were the better side throughout. Man Utd got
> > > > > back in the game only because Chelsea decided to give them more
> > > > > possession that was necessary in the second half of the second half,
> > > > > but the Blues still looked better when in possession themselves.
>
> > > > Obviously you didn't watch the match. Man Utd's best spell was from
> > > > the 45 to 70 min mark.
>
> > > I did watch the match though admittedly didn't pay much attention to
> > > the second half. But I could see in my peripheral vision that Manure
> > > were still largely shithouse and Chelski were going through the
> > > motions.
>
> > > > Chelsea "decided to give them more
> > > > possession"???
>
> > > Yeah. Like hoofing the ball out of defense when you know that would
> > > give it straight back to the opposition. There was really no need for
> > > that kind of tactic as they were in better control of the game than
> > > some of the back-men were allowing themselves to think.
>
> > > > BTW nothing like a defeat to bring out the Man Utd haters out in
> > > > force.
>
> > You make little sense as usual, although thank you for more or less
> > admitting that did not watch the match.
>
> > "Hoofing the ball out of defense" as you put it does not equate to
> > "going through the motions". It strikes me as a team under pressure,
> > which Chelsea were during the initial 15 to 20 mins of the 2nd half.
>
> > Man Utd were indeed shithouse as you put it in the 1st half, however
> > when someone constantly refers to a team as "Manure" it is clearly
> > impossible to engage in reasoned debate.
>
> So you are pretending to be up for reasonable debate now, are you?

Sad to see you avoiding the points raised....yet again.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
Prev: Where are the African "flair" players?
Next: My Formal Rather Belated Introduction!!!