I see Spurs lost
in [Arsenal]
|
Prev: Man City v Man Utd Sithcast
Next: New GK - David James?
From: Maxx on 28 Apr 2010 13:39 On Apr 26, 2:33 pm, "Yid Army" <yi...(a)thfc.com> wrote: > "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> wrote in message > > news:83kvj5Fbh2U1(a)mid.individual.net... > > > > > > > > > "Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > >news:07c711e2-9fdd-4ca1-8e0b-b57eaec78d16(a)g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com.... > > On Apr 25, 8:12 pm, "Jammies" <£££@$$$.com> wrote: > >> > >>"Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > >> > >>news:be7712f8-901d-41f8-9528-615108ca3813(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups..com... > >> > >>On Apr 24, 6:50 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII <popepompousxv...(a)popes.news> > >> > >>wrote: > >> > >>It's only because Yid Army - aka Plod - couldn't make it to the game > >> > >>and had to watch on tv Pope. Shocking. > >> > >>How were they supposed to perform without his "support"? > > >> > Your posts are becoming more and more about one person that it seems > >> > you > >> > are > >> > obtaining an unhealthy obsession for someone you don't even know. Your > >> > inferiority complex is all too obvious. > > >> LOL Usenet pop Psych 101 from the pajama man. We're talking football > >> here mate, so the only inferiority complex is a spud looking up at a > >> Gooner as usual. > > > Forgive my interuption here but.... "we're talking football here" Where > > exactly are you talking football? I just see another unprovoked attack on > > the object of your obsession and then an even more ridiculous retort to > > somebody pointing this out. > > Bingo. > He knows sweet FA about football. He's never participated in any thread > about the game itself - just half-witted epithets from a prick in SA who > desperately feels the need to 'belong'. > > Oh BTW... please can we all killfile the boer coz each time someone responds > to him, the little nonce gets back into my inbox.... ....he said, closing his eyes, blocking his ears and shaking is head.....
From: Diablos Rojos on 28 Apr 2010 14:42 "Maxx" <scary(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message news:a5803492-d3ca-457d-b1ca-a992cff4b0ba(a)40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 26, 10:01 am, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> > wrote: >> "Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message >> >> news:07c711e2-9fdd-4ca1-8e0b-b57eaec78d16(a)g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... >> On Apr 25, 8:12 pm, "Jammies" <���@$$$.com> wrote: >> >> > > >>"Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message >> > > >>news:be7712f8-901d-41f8-9528-615108ca3813(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... >> > > >>On Apr 24, 6:50 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII >> > > >><popepompousxv...(a)popes.news> >> > > >>wrote: >> > > >>It's only because Yid Army - aka Plod - couldn't make it to the >> > > >>game >> > > >>and had to watch on tv Pope. Shocking. >> > > >>How were they supposed to perform without his "support"? >> >> > > Your posts are becoming more and more about one person that it seems >> > > you >> > > are >> > > obtaining an unhealthy obsession for someone you don't even know. >> > > Your >> > > inferiority complex is all too obvious. >> > LOL Usenet pop Psych 101 from the pajama man. We're talking football >> > here mate, so the only inferiority complex is a spud looking up at a >> > Gooner as usual. >> >> Forgive my interuption here but.... "we're talking football here" Where >> exactly are you talking football? > > ManU-Tottenham - football. > mentioning teams in the context you were isn't talking football, you were chatting utter shite. >>I just see another unprovoked attack on >> the object of your obsession and then an even more ridiculous retort to >> somebody pointing this out. > > Plod reckons that you cannot watch footie on television - you have to > be at every game to qualify as a "supporter". When I heard he wasn't > going to be there to cheer his little team on, their was only going to > be one result - the usual loss. > Are there any Arsenal posters left on usenet that aren't missing a few up top?
From: Jammies on 28 Apr 2010 15:29 "Maxx" <scary(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message news:a5803492-d3ca-457d-b1ca-a992cff4b0ba(a)40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... On Apr 26, 10:01 am, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> wrote: > "Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > > news:07c711e2-9fdd-4ca1-8e0b-b57eaec78d16(a)g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 25, 8:12 pm, "Jammies" <���@$$$.com> wrote: > > > > >>"Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > > > >>news:be7712f8-901d-41f8-9528-615108ca3813(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > > >>On Apr 24, 6:50 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII <popepompousxv...(a)popes.news> > > > >>wrote: > > > >>It's only because Yid Army - aka Plod - couldn't make it to the game > > > >>and had to watch on tv Pope. Shocking. > > > >>How were they supposed to perform without his "support"? > > > > Your posts are becoming more and more about one person that it seems > > > you > > > are > > > obtaining an unhealthy obsession for someone you don't even know. Your > > > inferiority complex is all too obvious. > > LOL Usenet pop Psych 101 from the pajama man. We're talking football > > here mate, so the only inferiority complex is a spud looking up at a > > Gooner as usual. > > Forgive my interuption here but.... "we're talking football here" Where > exactly are you talking football? >ManU-Tottenham - football. >I just see another unprovoked attack on > the object of your obsession and then an even more ridiculous retort to > somebody pointing this out. >Plod reckons that you cannot watch footie on television - you have to >be at every game to qualify as a "supporter". When I heard he wasn't >going to be there to cheer his little team on, their was only going to >be one result - the usual loss. So you weren't talking about football then. Make your mind up,
From: Maxx on 29 Apr 2010 07:15 On Apr 28, 12:29 pm, "Jammies" <£££@$$$.com> wrote: > "Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > > news:a5803492-d3ca-457d-b1ca-a992cff4b0ba(a)40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 26, 10:01 am, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > "Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > > >news:07c711e2-9fdd-4ca1-8e0b-b57eaec78d16(a)g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com.... > > On Apr 25, 8:12 pm, "Jammies" <£££@$$$.com> wrote: > > > > > >>"Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > > > > >>news:be7712f8-901d-41f8-9528-615108ca3813(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > > > >>On Apr 24, 6:50 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII <popepompousxv...(a)popes.news> > > > > >>wrote: > > > > >>It's only because Yid Army - aka Plod - couldn't make it to the game > > > > >>and had to watch on tv Pope. Shocking. > > > > >>How were they supposed to perform without his "support"? > > > > > Your posts are becoming more and more about one person that it seems > > > > you > > > > are > > > > obtaining an unhealthy obsession for someone you don't even know. Your > > > > inferiority complex is all too obvious. > > > LOL Usenet pop Psych 101 from the pajama man. We're talking football > > > here mate, so the only inferiority complex is a spud looking up at a > > > Gooner as usual. > > > Forgive my interuption here but.... "we're talking football here" Where > > exactly are you talking football? > >ManU-Tottenham - football. > >I just see another unprovoked attack on > > the object of your obsession and then an even more ridiculous retort to > > somebody pointing this out. > >Plod reckons that you cannot watch footie on television - you have to > >be at every game to qualify as a "supporter". When I heard he wasn't > >going to be there to cheer his little team on, their was only going to > >be one result - the usual loss. > > So you weren't talking about football then. Make your mind up. ManU-spurs - football. Not confusing is it? Oh wait....you're always confused.
From: Jammies on 29 Apr 2010 11:51
"Maxx" <scary(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message news:c70aa137-0141-4439-9346-cb6d0ee06d08(a)o14g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... On Apr 28, 12:29 pm, "Jammies" <���@$$$.com> wrote: > "Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > > news:a5803492-d3ca-457d-b1ca-a992cff4b0ba(a)40g2000vbr.googlegroups.com... > On Apr 26, 10:01 am, "Diablos Rojos" <diablos_r0j0s(spam)@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > "Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > > >news:07c711e2-9fdd-4ca1-8e0b-b57eaec78d16(a)g11g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... > > On Apr 25, 8:12 pm, "Jammies" <���@$$$.com> wrote: > > > > > >>"Maxx" <sc...(a)executivemail.co.za> wrote in message > > > > >>news:be7712f8-901d-41f8-9528-615108ca3813(a)b23g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > > > >>On Apr 24, 6:50 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII > > > > >><popepompousxv...(a)popes.news> > > > > >>wrote: > > > > >>It's only because Yid Army - aka Plod - couldn't make it to the > > > > >>game > > > > >>and had to watch on tv Pope. Shocking. > > > > >>How were they supposed to perform without his "support"? > > > > > Your posts are becoming more and more about one person that it seems > > > > you > > > > are > > > > obtaining an unhealthy obsession for someone you don't even know. > > > > Your > > > > inferiority complex is all too obvious. > > > LOL Usenet pop Psych 101 from the pajama man. We're talking football > > > here mate, so the only inferiority complex is a spud looking up at a > > > Gooner as usual. > > > Forgive my interuption here but.... "we're talking football here" Where > > exactly are you talking football? > >ManU-Tottenham - football. > >I just see another unprovoked attack on > > the object of your obsession and then an even more ridiculous retort to > > somebody pointing this out. > >Plod reckons that you cannot watch footie on television - you have to > >be at every game to qualify as a "supporter". When I heard he wasn't > >going to be there to cheer his little team on, their was only going to > >be one result - the usual loss. > > So you weren't talking about football then. Make your mind up. >ManU-spurs - football. Not confusing is it? Oh wait....you're always >confused. Yep, confused by your irritant rantings....the subject of which (ie the location of a person you are obsessed with) you are confusing with football. |