Prev: FS: 1987 BBC Sports "The Official History Of Liverpool FC" VHS with Custom Case
Next: Local Blog WC coverage
From: milivella on 6 Jul 2010 09:41 anders t: > Quoting milivella in rec.sport.soccer: > > >BTW, don't you agree that the one could argue that the WC > >quarterfinalists are the best 8 teams in the world (and the winner is > >the best single team), while the same can't be said about the 4 > >semifinalists and the 2 finalists? > > I consider a team worthy (with some high probability bordering certainty) > of some stage x (x can be otos, group, loser of final (but not the winner > of the final - the special case)... you get it) if it went to stage x+1. > > So the semifinalists "definitely" belongs among the eight best teams (but > not necessarily among the four best). This is very interesting. Theoretically, you can easily set up a scenario in which this is not true, e.g. ("1" means "best team in the world", "2" means "second" and so on) 1 vs. 6 2 vs. 5 3 vs. 4 7 vs. 8 where team #7 will reach the semifinal while not performing above its level... ....but I guess that in most cases your rule of thumb works. (rule of) thumb up! d(^_^) -- Cheers milivella
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: FS: 1987 BBC Sports "The Official History Of Liverpool FC" VHS with Custom Case Next: Local Blog WC coverage |