FAQ: Were Freemasons behind the stoning of STEPHEN, the first Catholic martyr?
in [Manchester United]
|
Prev: FAQ: Were Freemasons behind the stoning of STEPHEN, the first Catholic martyr?
Next: Glad I'm divorced
From: Aaron on 6 Jul 2010 09:08 On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 05:27:00 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian <great_sage_equal_of_heaven_(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >more... >http://www.conchiglia.us/UK/UK_extra/UK_Piano_Massonico.htm By all means read that web-page! The guy claims to respect the authorities of the Roman Catholic Church, then denounces Official Roman Catholic Doctrine. You genocidal bigots don't seem to be able to string two thoughts together without disagreeing with yourselves.
From: Aaron on 8 Jul 2010 10:36 On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:35:21 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian <great_sage_equal_of_heaven_(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On 5 July, 23:22, Pope Pompous XVIII <popepompousxv...(a)iol.ie> wrote: >> Have a look at what St Luke has to say about them, whom he calls the >> **Synagogue of Freedmen** >> >> http://www.wcg.org/lit/bible/acts/acts6.htm >> >> I draw your attention in particular to these sections, towards the end of >> this essay: >> >> The preaching of Stephen (6:8-10); >> >> False accusations (6:11-14); >> >> Temple obsolete (6:11-14). >> >> My guess is that St Luke does indeed use coded language to refer to the >> Freemasons, doubtless because they could have had him put to death the >> same way they had STEPHEN stoned. Note as well how these early Freemasons >> were careful not to tell brazen lies about the Catholic Church, adopting >> instead the policy they still deploy to this day, which is to put a deadly >> twist on the truth. >> >> What chance did STEPHEN have against their poisonous words? They were >> determined to have his blood, and his blood they had. >> >> And so it is to this day - the Freemasons plotting against the Holy >> Catholic Church, and millions upon millions of Catholic martyrs paying for >> it with their lives. >> >> But at least now we know what the Bible writers think of these scheming >> scumbags. Isn't that right, Aaron? >> >> -- >> + His Holiness Pope Pompous XVIII >> >> Recedite, plebes! Gero rem imperialem! > >The evidence grows... Do you think that the Bible is getting bigger? Maybe you should read it sometime. >The Stoning of Stephen and the Synagogue of Freedmen > >In Acts 6:9, there is a reference to the "Synagogue of Freedmen" (the >Jews of Cyrene, Alexandria, Cilicia and Asia). These early freemasons >began to argue with the Christian martyr Stephen, and as it is written >"could not stand up against his wisdom or the Spirit by whom he >spoke." Producing false witnesses, they brought him before the >Sanhedrin, and after Stephen bore his testimony, they dragged him out >of the city and stoned him. (Acts 7:57) Anyone who bothers to actually read Acts will notice that the "false accusations" were that Stephen repeated Jesus' statement that the Temple would be destroyed and rebuilt in three days. The text never states whether or not Stephen explained that this referred to the body of Messiah which was destroyed and resurrected on the third day. The other "false accusation" was that Stephen taught that Jesus would change the "ethos" (ethical customs), which in Judaism would be the Halacha (the Way that Commandments were obeyed. The Talmud teaches that when Messiah comes, the Offerings will be prayer and praise rather than animals. Most of us who accept Jesus as Messiah pray for God to forgive our sins accepting that Jesus died for our sins rather than going to Jerusalem and killing an animal along with our prayer. So, the "accusations" against Stephen were true, it was the accuracy of his teaching that was the real question. First Stephen affirms his Jewish identity. Then, by outlining all of the sins of the Jewish people for over thirteen hundred years, Stephen embarrassed his audience, hurt them emotionally, and made angry with him. Once they are angry with him, but have no reason to convict him, in Acts 7:56, he confesses to the Sanhedrin that he sees two gods (Messiah and the Shekina). He never says that they are parts of the One God. So, his statement is taken as a confession of polytheism. First, you are trying to grasp at straws here to make a Masonic connection when you don't even have straws. Second, since God allowed Stephen's death, there must have been a purpose. God allowed the deaths of Nadav and Abihu at the sanctification of the Tabernacle, the beginning of the Temple Services. There does seem to be some parallel. Nadav and Abihu acted rashly without God's permission to lite fire on the Gold Altar. Their example teaches us to worship as God has commanded without making up new holidays, festivals or techniques. What was the purpose of Stephen's death? Stephen failed to preach the Gospel (Good News) to the Sanhedrin; instead he preached the Bad News of humanity's failures. Certainly, his story is an example that Christians should teach compassion towards others, even those who disagree with our spiritual beliefs. In other words, DS, this story teaches against your bigotry. >At the time, freemasonry had deeply established itself in Judaism, >then later into factions of Protestantism. >more... > >http://itwasjohnson.impiousdigest.com/intro1.html A reference that claims that Freemasonry existed centuries before it was invented, and which claims that the Star of Bethlehem was Satanic is not very believable.
From: Baldoni on 8 Jul 2010 18:11 Aaron formulated on Thursday : > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:35:21 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian > <great_sage_equal_of_heaven_(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On 5 July, 23:22, Pope Pompous XVIII <popepompousxv...(a)iol.ie> wrote: >>> Have a look at what St Luke has to say about them, whom he calls the >>> **Synagogue of Freedmen** >>> >>> http://www.wcg.org/lit/bible/acts/acts6.htm >>> >>> I draw your attention in particular to these sections, towards the end of >>> this essay: >>> >>> The preaching of Stephen (6:8-10); >>> >>> False accusations (6:11-14); >>> >>> Temple obsolete (6:11-14). >>> >>> My guess is that St Luke does indeed use coded language to refer to the >>> Freemasons, doubtless because they could have had him put to death the >>> same way they had STEPHEN stoned. Note as well how these early Freemasons >>> were careful not to tell brazen lies about the Catholic Church, adopting >>> instead the policy they still deploy to this day, which is to put a deadly >>> twist on the truth. >>> >>> What chance did STEPHEN have against their poisonous words? They were >>> determined to have his blood, and his blood they had. >>> >>> And so it is to this day - the Freemasons plotting against the Holy >>> Catholic Church, and millions upon millions of Catholic martyrs paying for >>> it with their lives. >>> >>> But at least now we know what the Bible writers think of these scheming >>> scumbags. Isn't that right, Aaron? >>> >>> -- >>> + His Holiness Pope Pompous XVIII >>> >>> Recedite, plebes! Gero rem imperialem! >> >> The evidence grows... > > Do you think that the Bible is getting bigger? > Maybe you should read it sometime. Why don't you give it a rest with this bullshit about reading the Bible. You speak as though you are the only person that has read it and you like to put it about that others like myself have not read it. Let me assure you that I am well read as regards the Bible (Catholic Edition) and was schooled in the best schools in London and Barcelona. I am also another person on these forums that enjoy the Mass being performed according to the Latin Rite. Did you by chance know that until recently many people were unable to read the Bible in their own language GM Aaron ? -- Count Baldoni
From: Aaron on 8 Jul 2010 19:04
On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:11:06 +0100, Baldoni <BaldoniXXV(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >Aaron formulated on Thursday : >> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 01:35:21 -0700 (PDT), Darth Simian >> <great_sage_equal_of_heaven_(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 5 July, 23:22, Pope Pompous XVIII <popepompousxv...(a)iol.ie> wrote: >>>> Have a look at what St Luke has to say about them, whom he calls the >>>> **Synagogue of Freedmen** >>>> >>>> http://www.wcg.org/lit/bible/acts/acts6.htm >>>> >>>> I draw your attention in particular to these sections, towards the end of >>>> this essay: >>>> >>>> The preaching of Stephen (6:8-10); >>>> >>>> False accusations (6:11-14); >>>> >>>> Temple obsolete (6:11-14). >>>> >>>> My guess is that St Luke does indeed use coded language to refer to the >>>> Freemasons, doubtless because they could have had him put to death the >>>> same way they had STEPHEN stoned. Note as well how these early Freemasons >>>> were careful not to tell brazen lies about the Catholic Church, adopting >>>> instead the policy they still deploy to this day, which is to put a deadly >>>> twist on the truth. >>>> >>>> What chance did STEPHEN have against their poisonous words? They were >>>> determined to have his blood, and his blood they had. >>>> >>>> And so it is to this day - the Freemasons plotting against the Holy >>>> Catholic Church, and millions upon millions of Catholic martyrs paying for >>>> it with their lives. >>>> >>>> But at least now we know what the Bible writers think of these scheming >>>> scumbags. Isn't that right, Aaron? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> + His Holiness Pope Pompous XVIII >>>> >>>> Recedite, plebes! Gero rem imperialem! >>> >>> The evidence grows... >> >> Do you think that the Bible is getting bigger? >> Maybe you should read it sometime. > >Why don't you give it a rest with this bullshit about reading the >Bible. You speak as though you are the only person that has read it >and you like to put it about that others like myself have not read it. Since DS is not a Christian, why do you think he would have read the Bible? He only posts here to make you look foolish. It is sad that you are so willing to be his fool. >Let me assure you that I am well read as regards the Bible (Catholic >Edition) and was schooled in the best schools in London and Barcelona. Lets test that claim! Please quote and explain the first verse of the Bible, or admit that you lied (Your failure to respond will also be an admission of dishonesty). >I am also another person on these forums that enjoy the Mass being >performed according to the Latin Rite. Who cares? It is not as if Latin was a significant language to God. > >Did you by chance know that until recently many people were unable to >read the Bible in their own language GM Aaron ? Why you choose to spew your personal opinion on that account is unknown. Are you trying to take credit for translating the Bible into other languages? |