Prev: The John De Lange Sophiticated Prediction Contest: Group Stage Final Standings
Next: There's even a FB page about Australian whiners! ;)
From: RED DEVIL on 25 Jun 2010 20:58 On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 17:34:07 -0600, MH <MHnospam(a)ucalgary.ca> wrote: >FF wrote: >> >> MH wrote: >>> FF wrote: >>>> Mehdi wrote: >>>>> Torres dives for a penalty. >>> May not have been a penalty (would have been harsh) but did not look >>> like a dive to me- he was bundled off the ball. >>> >>> Not booked. Dives under no contact from >>>>> Estrada, gets him a second yellow. Much bigger cheats than the Italians, >>>>> always have been. >>>> LOL >>>> >>>> As you probably know, I don't usually bother to respond to you, you're >>>> not much more than a troll most of the times. But now I have to say, >>>> you're delusional. Go get some help man, really. >>>> >>>> And there definitely was contact at that second yellow. Maybe not >>>> enough for a second yellow, possibly unintentional, then again it was >>>> from behind and it's the player's job to be careful not to do >>>> something like this. A little harsh maybe, but definitely acceptable. >>> I don't think it was a card at all, and it was definitely not acceptable >>> as this incident was entirely accidental, and , as Spain had scored on >>> the play anyway, the ref had an excellent excuse for taking no action. >> >> So you do agree there was contact. Well then, there was contact, it >> was from behind, the ref is in his right to issue a card. The other >> things matter less. > >I think there was contact, though I can't be sure Torres didn't trip >over his own shoe-laces. I don't think he dived. But the existence of >contact does not make it a foul. No way did he dive, there was definite contact RED DEVIL |