From: Mehdi on
> Subject : Brazil and beautiful football
> From : zelig9999(a)gmail.com

> I'm thinking today's match may help Brazil in the long run. It shows
> them that their beautiful football is not dead. If they had won with
> this Dunga brand of football it may have changed their play for the
> next 20 years. Now I think they will go back to what makes their fans
> happy and they are really best at.

Did you miss the 1994 World Cup? Brazil played anti football and won.
Dunga will go, a new coach will take over and change the personnel. The
only major change will be a ball playing midfielder alongside a DM.


--
http://soccer-europe.com
Rss feed : http://soccer-europe.com/RSS/News.xml
From: Clément on
"JCQ" escreveu:
> I'm thinking today's match may help Brazil in the long run. It shows
> them that their beautiful football is not dead.

It's not like we lost to a team that made a point of playing an artful,
entertaining style (mind you, this is not a criticism of the Dutch by any
means).

> If they had won with
> this Dunga brand of football it may have changed their play for the
> next 20 years.

You seem to assume that Dunga is guilty to change the fundamental approach
of the Brazilian NT. He has not. If anything, Dunga is "guilty" of
implementing some much needed work ethic and commitment to the NT. I hope
this doesn't die with this World Cup campaign.

> Now I think they will go back to what makes their fans
> happy and they are really best at.

What makes their fans happy is winning.

Abra�o,

Luiz Mello

From: Starcade on
On Jul 2, 11:25 am, Chagney Hunt <ess...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 2, 1:38 pm, JCQ <zelig9...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking today's match may help Brazil in the long run. It shows
> > them that their beautiful football is not dead. If they had won with
> > this Dunga brand of football it may have changed their play for the
> > next 20 years. Now I think they will go back to what makes their fans
> > happy and they are really best at.
>
> And here we go again. This cliche had only been dragged up everytime
> Brazil crashed out since 1990 -- but not a mention in 1994 and 2002.

But facts are facts: Brazil, as anyone who really believed they would
not win the tournament would've been forced to believe (like or lump
it), laid an egg and clearly beat themselves, knowing that they were
(before today) that much better than anyone else.

Brazil beat themselves.

Mike
From: Vuvuzela on
They do not and never did play "beautiful football". Back in 54 they
brutally beat up the Hungarians and that has never changed. They have
had good teams and players but did not play better than say the dutch
or Germans of the 70s. It is a myth jut like the myths about England
being so good all the time and Rooney being a world class player.

Starcade wrote:
> On Jul 2, 11:25 am, Chagney Hunt <ess...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jul 2, 1:38 pm, JCQ <zelig9...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm thinking today's match may help Brazil in the long run. It shows
> > > them that their beautiful football is not dead. If they had won with
> > > this Dunga brand of football it may have changed their play for the
> > > next 20 years. Now I think they will go back to what makes their fans
> > > happy and they are really best at.
> >
> > And here we go again. This cliche had only been dragged up everytime
> > Brazil crashed out since 1990 -- but not a mention in 1994 and 2002.
>
> But facts are facts: Brazil, as anyone who really believed they would
> not win the tournament would've been forced to believe (like or lump
> it), laid an egg and clearly beat themselves, knowing that they were
> (before today) that much better than anyone else.
>
> Brazil beat themselves.
>
> Mike
From: zeebjii on
I agree. It pained my heart greatly when i saw my beloved brazil
playing for a draw and looking utterly disinterested in the second
half vs portugal.

> What makes their fans happy is winning.
>
> Abra o,
>
> Luiz Mello