Brasileirão Maluco 2010
in [World Football]
|
From: Sid on 10 Apr 2010 19:16 * milivella [2010-04-10 13:36] [rec.sport.soccer]: > To all our opponents: > > By now it's been agreed: > I play with Sid, > we share, no greed. > You don't have to read, > there is no need, > you already know that we'll take the lead > with so much speed > that we'll make you bleed. > But then we'll smoke _a bit of_ weed [1] > (sometimes you have to exceed!) > and we'll concede > you some points, and you'll precede > us, but we'll recede > from smoking, proceed... > ...and succeed. > Indeed! > > [1] that today is just a seed To continue: Yes, we are set for a dual threat. Propose any bet, We'll make you regret, ever having met, this all-conquering duet. Wait, do not fret, or break a sweat we haven't started yet! Sid -- 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 remove the espam bits to mail
From: Jesus Petry on 30 Apr 2010 16:10 On Apr 8, 1:16 am, Jesus Petry <jesuspe...(a)pop.com.br> wrote: > On 8 abr, 00:55, Sid <sid(a)invalid_nerte.invalid.invalid_net.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > * milivella [2010-04-07 14:27] [rec.sport.soccer]: > > > > Sid: > > > >> Milivella, are we co-managing or do you think you want to run the > > >> team by yourself? > > > We're definitely co-managing! :) > > > Great! > > > > If you agree, our policy will be: if one of us read aMalucopost, he > > > can reply (pick a set of teams/bet/accept/raise/reject); he doesn't > > > need to confer with the co-manager. OK? (The best way to show me that > > > you agree would be to pick a set of teams! :) But if you won't do it > > > in 24 hours, I'll do it.) > > > Agreed. I have picked E. The top of group A is stronger, but I think E > > is more balanced. > > Great! There is only one pool left, and it has both the defending > champions and the sensation team of this year in Brazil! Of course, it > also has a struggling Goiás and long absent Ceará, but we had to keep > things balanced. We're having trouble finding a fifth player. Maybe Sid and Milivella should split and pick a group each? Tchau! Jesus Petry
From: milivella on 30 Apr 2010 20:28 Jesus Petry: > We're having trouble finding a fifth player. Maybe Sid and Milivella > should split and pick a group each? It could be OK for me, if nobody minds my eventual absences. But my favorite option as holder of the fifth group is (I don't want to be annoying, but let me repeat it one last time) *Jesus*: please please please, it will be a lot of fun! :) -- Cheers milivella
From: Sid on 30 Apr 2010 21:37 * milivella [2010-04-30 19:28] [rec.sport.soccer]: > Jesus Petry: > >> We're having trouble finding a fifth player. Maybe Sid and Milivella >> should split and pick a group each? > > It could be OK for me, if nobody minds my eventual absences. But my Unfortunately, I am in the same position with a possibility of periods of absence. I fear the game might suffer with two infrequent participants. > favorite option as holder of the fifth group is (I don't want to be > annoying, but let me repeat it one last time) *Jesus*: please please > please, it will be a lot of fun! :) Even without the reasoning above, I think it would be great if Jesus participated. However, if you are unwilling, I am okay with Andrea and I splitting up. In that situation, I think it is only fair that he have the choice of picking E or A. Sid -- 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 remove the espam bits to mail
From: Jesus Petry on 3 May 2010 09:36
On Apr 30, 9:28 pm, milivella <milive...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Jesus Petry: > > > We're having trouble finding a fifth player. Maybe Sid and Milivella > > should split and pick a group each? > > It could be OK for me, if nobody minds my eventual absences. But my > favorite option as holder of the fifth group is (I don't want to be > annoying, but let me repeat it one last time) *Jesus*: please please > please, it will be a lot of fun! :) I can't play if I pick the games for bets. I could play if someone else did that. Tchau! Jesus Petry |