From: Jesper Lauridsen on 22 Jun 2010 16:56 Going strictly by group standings this time. Then nobody can complain. URU - KOR -+ +---+ SLO (1C) - GER (2D) -+ | +---+ NED (1E) - ITA (2F) -+ | | +---+ | BRA (1G) - SPA (2H) -+ | +-------- GHA (1D) - USA (2C) -+ | +---+ | ARG - MEX -+ | | +---+ PAR (1F) - JAP (2E) -+ | +---+ CHI (1H) - POR (2G) -+
From: Quincy on 22 Jun 2010 20:56 On 22 Jun., 22:56, Jesper Lauridsen <rorsc...(a)sorrystofanet.dk> wrote: > Going strictly by group standings this time. Then nobody can complain. > > URU - KOR -+ > +---+ > SLO (1C) - GER (2D) -+ | > +---+ > NED (1E) - ITA (2F) -+ | | > +---+ | > BRA (1G) - SPA (2H) -+ | > +-------- > GHA (1D) - USA (2C) -+ | > +---+ | > ARG - MEX -+ | | > +---+ > PAR (1F) - JAP (2E) -+ | > +---+ > CHI (1H) - POR (2G) -+ I like the second quarter: NED, ITA, BRA, SPA LOL!!!!!!! PS: Germany won't be second in group D, first or out.
From: Jesper Lauridsen on 23 Jun 2010 16:34
Going strictly by group standings this time. Then nobody can complain. URU - KOR -+ +---+ USA - GHA -+ | +---+ NED (1E) - ITA (2F) -+ | | +---+ | BRA (1G) - SPA (2H) -+ | +-------- GER - ENG -+ | +---+ | ARG - MEX -+ | | +---+ PAR (1F) - JAP (2E) -+ | +---+ CHI (1H) - POR (2G) -+ |